Mini 499: Just Your typical Mafia Game GAME OVER!!!!!!!!

[shaka!!]

Excellent, I will elaborate later. Busy at work ):

Mod Edit

Vote Count

Kakeng- 2 (shaka!!, White)
somestrangeflea- 2 (cicero, Jester)

cicero- 1 (somestrangeflea)
Jester- 1 (Gorgon)
shaka!!-1 (Skitzer)
Skitzer- 1 (pwayne66)
Skruffs- 1 (Theopor_COD)

Not voting (3): Chocolate Attack, Kakeng, Skruffs

7 to lynch

[pwayne66]

I thought about admitting that I hadn't noticed the menu's before, but I thought it made me look like a raging noob. I feel better now saying this: I didn't notice them either but was pretty excited to find out about them.

[pwayne66]

Who

was

skitzer and why was I voting them?

Unvote:skitzer

[White]

I'm thinking AlyG. If you go to the first page you can see who is currently playing (read lurking) and who they replaced.

[cicero]

Yeah. AlyG became Skitzer. Another neat trick I found (which some might like and some might not). Go to your profile and select "Always show First Post on every Topic Page:" Change it to yes. Then the threads very first post, which contains all players, will appear at the top of every page. I find it very useful for keeping track of people. Especially when there are a lot of replacements.

[Kakeng]

My exams just finished. I will read and post by today.

[JordanA24]

OK, Kakeng posted, so I'm setting a retractable deadline for 3 weeks from now

(October 26th at 9.00PM GMT)

.

[somestrangeflea]

a) the argument over Prof. Guppy's play;

Prof. Guppy's play was incredibly scummy, no doubt about it, and neither of the replacements have actually contributed very much (although I imagine Skruffs will). I have noticed that PG's crimes seem to have been paid less attention to after he replaced out, which seems kinda weird...

b) the argument between cicero and White;

I'm on White's side in this argument... However, something else I've noticed is that this game does seem to have, or has had, a number of volatile players. Without meaning to sound too patronising, but myself, cicero, White, BM and PG seem to have trouble keeping calm, which can't be good...

c) Battle Mage's play, when he was in the game?

Battle Mage's play is... alternative, to say the least.

However, broken logic is scummy, not a playstyle...

[White]

Hahaha, i'm not sure I have trouble keeping calm so much as it's fun to get super agressive and angry sounding.

[cicero]

b) the argument between cicero and White;

I'm on White's side in this argument... ...

Interesting reversal. How do you reconcile saying that with this.

You've only argued with Cicero over I have no idea I've forgotten now.

Yeah...

I'm not very comfortable with the fact that me and Cicero effectively got "SHUTUPPLXKTHX"...

I'm not interested in whose side you were on. I'm interested in you explaining away the apparent inconsistency.

--------------------------
(trying to bully the town will make me (over)react all the time, every time. I promise.)

[somestrangeflea]

I'm on White's side in this argument... ...

Interesting reversal. How do you reconcile saying that with this.

Yeah...

I'm not very comfortable with the fact that me and Cicero effectively got "SHUTUPPLXKTHX"...

Inconsistency? They are two completely unrelated posts.
1 = In the argument between you and White, I believed that White was correct.
2 = I disliked the fact that my argument with you was cut short.

Other than the keyword "argument", there's nothing about the two posts which are in anyway related to each other.

I'm not interested in whose side you were on.

Well why would you be? You didn't ask!

[cicero]

I'm on White's side in this argument... ...

Interesting reversal. How do you reconcile saying that with this.

Yeah...

I'm not very comfortable with the fact that me and Cicero effectively got "SHUTUPPLXKTHX"...

Inconsistency? They are two completely unrelated posts.
1 = In the argument between you and White, I believed that White was correct.
2 = I disliked the fact that my argument with you was cut short.

Other than the keyword "argument", there's nothing about the two posts which are in anyway related to each other.

I'm not interested in whose side you were on.

Well why would you be? You didn't ask!

Sorry - I'm confused. My argument with White was over him wanting the argument cut short. Hence why I would connect the two. How do you perceive it?

[Gorgon]

Okay, I've done a reread, finally. Nothing jumps out that I didn't notice before, really ... but I have one question about a post of mine that skitzer commented on.

Post 334: Things weren’t looking to good…I wonder what happened?

334 a post where I commented on all the players. I don't understand this question, skitzer. Could you clarify?

I'm also waiting on Skruffs to expand on his thoughts regarding the posts on page 4, since this seems to concern me ... something to do with what I was saying about CLA? I can't answer until I know what's supposedly suspicious about it.

At this point, I'm going to

Vote: Kakeng

. He still hasn't posted much, and I think he's our best shot right now. The day has to end eventually.

[skitzer]

Sure, Gorgon.

I was commenting on how you commented on AlyG, the person I replaced. Thing weren't looking very good for me, and it made me wonder how I failed to be lynched. Sorry If I confused you.

[somestrangeflea]

Sorry - I'm confused. My argument with White was over him wanting the argument cut short. Hence why I would connect the two. How do you perceive it?

I saw it as an argument over the validity of your case against me.

[White]

Nah, I wanted you two to stop bickering because it wasn't going anywhere other and giving you two post count and not convincing anyone else.

[somestrangeflea]

Nah, I wanted you two to stop bickering because it wasn't going anywhere other and

giving you two post count

and not convincing anyone else.

S**t! He's on to us!

*runs

[cicero]

Nah, I wanted you two to stop bickering because it wasn't going anywhere other and

giving you two post count

and not convincing anyone else.

S**t! He's on to us!

*runs

lmao

[Kakeng]

So... I guess it's time for me to defend myself, but for what, lurking? I won't be able to make a defense unless I know the case against me. From what I read, I'm being lynched for lurking and BM aggressive play.

[cicero]

So... I guess it's time for me to defend myself, but for what, lurking? I won't be able to make a defense unless I know the case against me. From what I read, I'm being lynched for lurking and BM aggressive play.

How about you give us your thoughts on the game. . Give us a run down on who you think is scummy and why, and on what has happened in the game thus far. Love to hear your thoughts on the game.

[theopor_COD]

So... I guess it's time for me to defend myself, but for what, lurking? I won't be able to make a defense unless I know the case against me. From what I read, I'm being lynched for lurking and BM aggressive play.

3 votes = being lynched. Defensive much?

Promise I'll re-read tomorrow as I'm miles adrift.

[White]

I'm actually going to let that one slide due to the {Townsperson} title under his name.

Kakeng, that's the first, only and last time i'm going to let something like this slide.

[shaka!!]

Kakeng you can defend yourself by actually playing the game.

If you can put forward good input and play like a pro town player then I will be willing to let BM's actions slide.

[Skruffs]

Page 5-
Daedalus oppurtunistic voting of C.L.A. who hadn't posted for a few days. THerefore not a pressure vote, rather an oppurtunistic vote. WAgon on CLA went nowhere,w as going nowhere, so why this sneaky little vote?

Gorgon points it out - Battlemage ignores to keep attention on Cicero.
PWayne jumps in, on BM, ignores Gorgon's statement and Daedalus's vote as well.


Chocolate attack refers to other comments made by Gorgon, ignores him.

Daedalus lays low as BM goes through his persecution ritual, even Gorgon drops the case, not mentioning it again.

ssf, theo ignroe BM argument and focus on missing CLA. hmm.

Maybe it's not a huge deal, but I *think* that was the first -1 in the game and I'm curious why it was basically ignored?

[Skruffs]

bah, nevermind, checked the voet count and CLA was only at three, not 5 like he had been the previous page. DAedalus was also already voting him.
Nevermind. >.<