Next post: top scum suspect.
me: Almost50
In post 398, camn wrote:Then you need rope.
In post 12, Almost50 wrote:Also FoS on RC. You kept the thread locked long enough for scum to get acquainted to eachother in their QT.
In post 30, Almost50 wrote:The mafia QT is open during the day, so.. yeah.. they probably got to talk in private while we were still locked out bc RC forgot to unlock this thread.
In post 404, iraonavp wrote:I think he's implying in a really awkward way that he thinks SnarkySnowman is scum-aligned. If so, that would be a first.
Are you reading anyone else as scum-aligned, Almost50? If so, you should probably vote them. What about Katsuki, I think that would be a good vote?
In post 402, Almost50 wrote:In post 398, camn wrote:Then you need rope.
I don't mind.
Unfortunately, the only player in this game who should be capable of fully understanding myargumentis currently voting me with you.
In post 405, Thurhame wrote:the thread would assume he was running late
rereading again once I gather home. Then I shall do this.In post 400, camn wrote:This placea wasteland full of crickets.is
EVERYONE-
Next post: top scum suspect.
me: Almost50
In post 394, Almost50 wrote:Show me someone who IS doing something in this game, including yourself. EVERYONE is waiting for someone else to make their move, and I can't get a single scum read thus far. Nobody stands out as scum and nobody is making an argument I could comment on. Lynch me for all I care.
This eeally sucks.In post 397, Almost50 wrote:Defense? I'm not going to defend myself. I AM lurking, for lack of any better options. If I do anything in this game status I'd look like I'm trying too hard. Damned if you do; damned it you don't. I'm just taking the easy route of being damned for NOT trying.
But why?In post 399, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 398, camn wrote:Then you need rope.
not as much as snarky does
In post 411, Aristophanes wrote:But why?In post 399, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 398, camn wrote:Then you need rope.
not as much as snarky does
(I should iso to see if there's a case from you..)
I kinda agree, as I had mentioned previously. However, if the scum get pregame chatter, their pt would be open already and require no mod action to have that occur.In post 405, Thurhame wrote:Katsuki is still my best scumread - and not just for the quicklynch; I was scumreading (and voting) him before that as well. But since it looks like half the town disagrees with that, I'm willing to settle for Almost50.
There are two reasons Almost50 seems scummy to me. One is the way he hopped on the end of my wagon specifically to "get a claim," and hopped off the moment I did claim. The other is this slip:In post 12, Almost50 wrote:Also FoS on RC. You kept the thread locked long enough for scum to get acquainted to eachother in their QT.In post 30, Almost50 wrote:The mafia QT is open during the day, so.. yeah.. they probably got to talk in private while we were still locked out bc RC forgot to unlock this thread.
A normal person who thought RC forgot to unlock the thread would assume he was running late - in which case the scum QT would have still been locked too. But Almost50 knew it was only the main thread that RC "forgot", implying that he has access to some quicktopic. At first I assumed he might be a Neighbor like me but in a different neighborhood (the fact that my neighborhood has a specific name made me think it might not be the only one); however, with three non-neighbor flips a second neighborhood seems unlikely. So he's probably one of the Mafia.
VOTE: Almost50
Ah!In post 412, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 411, Aristophanes wrote:But why?In post 399, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 398, camn wrote:Then you need rope.
not as much as snarky does
(I should iso to see if there's a case from you..)
snarky's ISO is my case
In post 410, Aristophanes wrote:In post 394, Almost50 wrote:Show me someone who IS doing something in this game, including yourself. EVERYONE is waiting for someone else to make their move, and I can't get a single scum read thus far. Nobody stands out as scum and nobody is making an argument I could comment on. Lynch me for all I care.
This eeally sucks.In post 397, Almost50 wrote:Defense? I'm not going to defend myself. I AM lurking, for lack of any better options. If I do anything in this game status I'd look like I'm trying too hard. Damned if you do; damned it you don't. I'm just taking the easy route of being damned for NOT trying.
I'd love for a bit of scumhunting from you! Giving up is antitown, especially when it is unnecessary!
I beg of you to do something!
In post 407, iraonavp wrote:So you're saying that since SnarkySnowman is also lurking, he should understand your point?
I realize this.In post 415, iraonavp wrote:In post 410, Aristophanes wrote:In post 394, Almost50 wrote:Show me someone who IS doing something in this game, including yourself. EVERYONE is waiting for someone else to make their move, and I can't get a single scum read thus far. Nobody stands out as scum and nobody is making an argument I could comment on. Lynch me for all I care.
This eeally sucks.In post 397, Almost50 wrote:Defense? I'm not going to defend myself. I AM lurking, for lack of any better options. If I do anything in this game status I'd look like I'm trying too hard. Damned if you do; damned it you don't. I'm just taking the easy route of being damned for NOT trying.
I'd love for a bit of scumhunting from you! Giving up is antitown, especially when it is unnecessary!
I beg of you to do something!
Do you think Almost50 is likely to be scum-aligned? You've done absolutely nothing yourself, I remind you.
Have you ever heard that the acknowledgement of one's meta renders that meta null?In post 416, Almost50 wrote:In post 407, iraonavp wrote:So you're saying that since SnarkySnowman is also lurking, he should understand your point?
No. I really didn't want to explain, but ... ok..
Snarky's the only one on the list who has played with me before. Even better, he played with me as both scum & town. When I act like I don't care top get lynched it means I'm a VT. I always think that lynching a VT is better than lynching a PR. I do acknowledge that lynching scum is even better, but let's face it: You guys are moving in circles and don't know what you're doing. There's no one person standing out as obv.scum for the whole town to vote. We are thus likely to lynch one of our own.
When I'm acting more careful though I could either be scum or a PR myself. My play as a PR is very much like my play as scum. As a VT I stand out and -while I'm working on it- I can't help but be more at ease, more sarcastic, more careless.. etc.
So, there. I am a VT, and I would have preferred to eat the rope or get NK'd over losing a PR, but the way you're acting (you as in plural you) it looks like my death will be in vain anyway.
^^In post 419, Almost50 wrote:It's not "meta" as in something you do inadvertently or subconsciously. It is an established way of playing. I DO get myself lynched if it's going to stop the lynch of a PR... intentionally. Of course, it is null NOW bc I did explain it to you all. Before that, only Snarky should've picked up the signal.
In post 400, camn wrote:This placea wasteland full of crickets.is
EVERYONE-
Next post: top scum suspect.
me: Almost50