New York 194: Guns N' Roses Mafia! (Day 8)
-
-
SirCakez he/himIs A Liehe/him
- Is A Lie
- Is A Lie
- Posts: 28069
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
Killthestory Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: September 8, 2015
-
-
Fraggernaut Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: May 13, 2015
- Location: Florida
- Happy Scumday!
I like Ness for realizing what my post towards killthestory was, which was just a little reaction prod. A bad one albeit some may think, but it's day one & typically my day one play is pretty eh. Im just trying to get a feel for people in the game.
My post wasn't hardly a joke, but the reaction from Story & SirCakez was pretty interesting in that they felt a strong urge or need to respond to it. Hook, line & sinker which could of easily be opportunistic scum trying to jump on something as minor as a reaction test.
Hey Slandaar. It's been explained by Boonskie (#75) & Egg (#99), & I think I get what they're trying to explain. I think I would compare it to say video mafia which I have more experience in, where a scum is more likely to say "what do you want from me" or something along them lines to appeal to town or to try to seem town after a possible slip or something weird that they've said.-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 100, SirCakez wrote:Ness you know Day 1 posts have lots of value, that "day 1 posts have little merit" argument is bad.
Oh, I forgot to say that early day 1 usually isn't very meritable.-
-
Killthestory Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: September 8, 2015
In post 103, N e s s wrote:In post 100, SirCakez wrote:Ness you know Day 1 posts have lots of value, that "day 1 posts have little merit" argument is bad.
Oh, I forgot to say that early day 1 usually isn't very meritable.
then why are you so defensive
frag if you admit that the reaction shit was shit then clearly the reactions you get will be shit-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 104, Killthestory wrote:In post 103, N e s s wrote:In post 100, SirCakez wrote:Ness you know Day 1 posts have lots of value, that "day 1 posts have little merit" argument is bad.
Oh, I forgot to say that early day 1 usually isn't very meritable.
then why are you so defensive
frag if you admit that the reaction shit was shit then clearly the reactions you get will be shit
I wasn't planning on humoring you with a reply, but only got 1 thing to say
-
-
Fraggernaut Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: May 13, 2015
- Location: Florida
- Happy Scumday!
In post 104, Killthestory wrote:In post 103, N e s s wrote:In post 100, SirCakez wrote:Ness you know Day 1 posts have lots of value, that "day 1 posts have little merit" argument is bad.
Oh, I forgot to say that early day 1 usually isn't very meritable.
then why are you so defensive
frag if you admit that the reaction shit was shit then clearly the reactions you get will be shit
Not at all. I say albeit some may think it was a bad reaction test. I never said I thought it was bad.
I believe your reaction was a genuine reaction to it, and the reaction was pretty eh.-
-
Killthestory Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: September 8, 2015
-
-
Killthestory Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: September 8, 2015
In post 106, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 104, Killthestory wrote:In post 103, N e s s wrote:In post 100, SirCakez wrote:Ness you know Day 1 posts have lots of value, that "day 1 posts have little merit" argument is bad.
Oh, I forgot to say that early day 1 usually isn't very meritable.
then why are you so defensive
frag if you admit that the reaction shit was shit then clearly the reactions you get will be shit
Not at all. I say albeit some may think it was a bad reaction test. I never said I thought it was bad.
I believe your reaction was a genuine reaction to it, and the reaction was pretty eh.
Im ok with this explanation-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 107, Killthestory wrote:why are so defensive? clearly that was just a reaction test and joke post that i was making?
however now youre responding to me with memes? dont you realize how defensive that is?
great job you figured it out i'm José the taco vendor-
-
Killthestory Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: September 8, 2015
In post 109, N e s s wrote:In post 107, Killthestory wrote:why are so defensive? clearly that was just a reaction test and joke post that i was making?
however now youre responding to me with memes? dont you realize how defensive that is?
great job you figured it out i'm José the taco vendor
how great job admitting your scum, what are you abilities? what do your tacos do specifically scum?-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 110, Killthestory wrote:In post 109, N e s s wrote:In post 107, Killthestory wrote:why are so defensive? clearly that was just a reaction test and joke post that i was making?
however now youre responding to me with memes? dont you realize how defensive that is?
great job you figured it out i'm José the taco vendor
how great job admitting your scum, what are you abilities? what do your tacos do specifically scum?
My tacos will make someone very happy when you get 1 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)-
-
Killthestory Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5003
- Joined: September 8, 2015
-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 112, Killthestory wrote:happiness is a scumtell
Oh shit what have i done-
-
Fraggernaut Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: May 13, 2015
- Location: Florida
- Happy Scumday!
Can we keep the shit posting to a minimum & attempt to solve this game please?-
-
Killthestory Jack of All Trades
-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 114, Fraggernaut wrote:Can we keep the shit posting to a minimum & attempt to solve this game please?
Sorry, I needed to get my silliness out when I was tempted.-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
-
-
KickAssAndGiggle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: December 29, 2015
- Location: Herts, UK
In post 66, Egg wrote:Kickandgiggle, what do you think about jam and the wagon on him?
Feel free to make it KAAG, save the old keyboard.
Someone's gotta get wagoned early, may as well have been him. But Ness is now scumming the place up, so we need a new one.
In post 117, N e s s wrote:Also before I forget this doesn't seem to be serving much of any purpose at the moment.
UNVOTE:
BZZZZ. Wrong.
VOTE: N e s sIt's OK if you disagree with me. I can'tyou to be right...force-
-
Something_Smart He/himSomewhat_BalancedHe/him
- Somewhat_Balanced
- Somewhat_Balanced
- Posts: 23126
- Joined: November 17, 2015
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Upstate New York
I don't like Egg's questions to jam in 66, number 3 in particular is basically, "do you like your role?" which feels like rolefishing disguised as RQS.
I also don't like pisskop's rolefishing in 83 but it reads like a joke, although it was not interpreted that way.
79 felt weak at the time, but it makes sense as a reaction test. I don't think it was obvious however and Ness's reaction in 85 is really bad and opportunistic. And 105 is just bad.
On the other hand Killthestory's reaction felt genuine and read as towny outrage to me. Fragger said in 102 that his reaction was "interesting" and "could be opportunistic scum" but then in 106 says it was "genuine" but then was also "pretty eh". What do you actually mean?
UNVOTE:
Scumleans are iraonavp and Ness, and maybe Fragger depending on his response.-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 118, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:In post 66, Egg wrote:Kickandgiggle, what do you think about jam and the wagon on him?
Feel free to make it KAAG, save the old keyboard.
Someone's gotta get wagoned early, may as well have been him. But Ness is now scumming the place up, so we need a new one.
In post 117, N e s s wrote:Also before I forget this doesn't seem to be serving much of any purpose at the moment.
UNVOTE:
BZZZZ. Wrong.
VOTE: N e s s
Why is that wrong?-
-
KickAssAndGiggle Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: December 29, 2015
- Location: Herts, UK
-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
In post 119, Something_Smart wrote:I don't like Egg's questions to jam in 66, number 3 in particular is basically, "do you like your role?" which feels like rolefishing disguised as RQS.
I also don't like pisskop's rolefishing in 83 but it reads like a joke, although it was not interpreted that way.
79 felt weak at the time, but it makes sense as a reaction test. I don't think it was obvious however and Ness's reaction in 85 is really bad and opportunistic. And 105 is just bad.
On the other hand Killthestory's reaction felt genuine and read as towny outrage to me. Fragger said in 102 that his reaction was "interesting" and "could be opportunistic scum" but then in 106 says it was "genuine" but then was also "pretty eh". What do you actually mean?
UNVOTE:
Scumleans are iraonavp and Ness, and maybe Fragger depending on his response.
As for you saying that i'm opportunistic, he seemed too defensive for the levels that Frag had going for him.
In post 80, Killthestory wrote:fake? motherfucker i didnt even realize this game was a thing until like 30 minutes ago or whatever.
I know this can be read as "genuine" but him saying this didn't sit right with me. As for post 105, I didn't feel the need to reply to that since he said that i was defensive in this post when i really don't see anything wrong with it.
In post 94, N e s s wrote:In post 91, Killthestory wrote:In post 90, N e s s wrote:In post 88, SirCakez wrote:Frag's post didn't look like a joke....
I don't mean exactly joke post, I said reaction test or whatever the hell it was because I didn't know what he was doing with it. My point is that story looked very defensive to a post with hardly any merit with it due to it being Day 1.
Either way they both look weird to me.
you didnt say that.
anyway, shit has merit any day of any game. theres no reason to not take something more seriously than another post disregarding joke posts or RVS, which that clearly wasnt either.
you also didnt say that they both looked weird
*ahem.
In post 85, N e s s wrote:
You seem really defensivefor anobvious reaction testor joke postidk what it was.
Also, welcome to day 1. Where hardly anything has a lot of merit besides some titanium scumslip. I'm pretty sure we all know that day 1 doesn't give people much a chance to be suspicious. If you see something that is clearly rummage towards you being scum, no need to reply to it since it doesn't mean shit. You replied to it way too defensively considering the levels he had on you. Thats why I think you look weird.
Also, as for your last little bit of saying "I never said either looked weird" thats a part of my opinions that I just stated, as i literally got home a little under and hour ago. Which as for that, I mean both you and Frag as others have said above that Frag's quote towards you looks odd.
In other words thats all I have to explain myself right now.-
-
N e s s Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 414
- Joined: December 20, 2015
- Location: Onett
Please answer my question above you.-
-
Fraggernaut Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1491
- Joined: May 13, 2015
- Location: Florida
- Happy Scumday!
In post 119, Something_Smart wrote:I don't like Egg's questions to jam in 66, number 3 in particular is basically, "do you like your role?" which feels like rolefishing disguised as RQS.
I also don't like pisskop's rolefishing in 83 but it reads like a joke, although it was not interpreted that way.
79 felt weak at the time, but it makes sense as a reaction test. I don't think it was obvious however and Ness's reaction in 85 is really bad and opportunistic. And 105 is just bad.
On the other hand Killthestory's reaction felt genuine and read as towny outrage to me. Fragger said in 102 that his reaction was "interesting" and "could be opportunistic scum" but then in 106 says it was "genuine" but then was also "pretty eh". What do you actually mean?
UNVOTE:
Scumleans are iraonavp and Ness, and maybe Fragger depending on his response.
As stated in a earlier post of mine, my day one logic is pretty fluctuating. The response was interesting, cause the reaction seemed geuine but also way over the top & over exaggerated; if that makes any sense to anyone else. I think in general right now I'm pretty in between & null on Story.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.