[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7789463 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 598: Anime U-Pick Pack A (CRUNCHYROLL WINS!) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #39 (isolation #9) » Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:14 pm
Postby androgybee »
my god what a terrible post. what are you trying to do with that post? are you trying to discredit us? are you trying to throw shade? how rude. lemme tell u something Rhazh my newest pal; shadiness is a trait I like in trees and little else.
VOTE: RhazhBash
to answer ur question tho we did feel the Soren vote was legit. but a u vote is now even more legit. like, full tiers of legit-ness above the soren vote. it's really quite something.
Post
Post #40 (isolation #10) » Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:15 pm
Postby androgybee »
In post 39, androgybee wrote:my god what a terrible post. what are you trying to do with that post? are you trying to discredit us? are you trying to throw shade? how rude. lemme tell u something Rhazh my newest pal; shadiness is a trait I like in trees and little else.
VOTE: RhazhBash
to answer ur question tho we did feel the Soren vote was legit. but a u vote is now even more legit. like, full tiers of legit-ness above the soren vote. it's really quite something.
Someone else already used the word so probably not.
we were under the assumption that it was a post restriction only Jeanne had. the fact that apparently it can affect all of us is kind of crazy, assuming Jeanne is reading her role right/isn't lying.
Post
Post #54 (isolation #12) » Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:23 am
Postby androgybee »
actually you know what? that sounds a bit too ridiculous to be true. i think jeanne might be misunderstanding and only they have the post restriction. i want to shed some light on this.
@mod could players potentially have a post restriction they themselves are not made aware of in their role PM? including the possibility of a global post restriction
Post
Post #59 (isolation #13) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 2:50 am
Postby androgybee »
I'm just patiently waiting for my new pal RhazhBash to respond to my vote on them which I gave 4 minutes after their last post. i hope i did not scare them aware with my AGGRESSIVE PLAYSTYLE
Post
Post #63 (isolation #14) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 4:55 am
Postby androgybee »
In post 60, RhazhBash wrote:M8 your aggressive playstyle must have scared the entire game away because nobody's been posting. I was waiting for something worth the effort to make a post for, but it doesn't look like I'm gonna get anything anytime soon.
so you felt my vote on you was unworthy of a response because.........???
be the change you want to see in the world. MAKE something happen. let's stop sitting on our hands, people.
i like the wagon i have started. it's a great wagon. amazon, even. maybe you should join it and see what happens. or maybe you should tell me why you don't wanna join it. or something. idk man, i'm not you. i can't make your content for you.
In post 33, KainTepes wrote:VOTE: SOREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why do you ask 'would you rvs???' meaning???
I actually think you are onto something.
VOTE: Soren
Which would be?
In post 39, androgybee wrote:my god what a terrible post. what are you trying to do with that post? are you trying to discredit us? are you trying to throw shade? how rude. lemme tell u something Rhazh my newest pal; shadiness is a trait I like in trees and little else.
VOTE: RhazhBash
to answer ur question tho we did feel the Soren vote was legit. but a u vote is now even more legit. like, full tiers of legit-ness above the soren vote. it's really quite something.
That's a lot of questions to shroud over your horrible vote. I'm keeping my vote on you.
the questions were for realsies and also designed to highlight the lame-ness of the post i was calling out. it's not a "shroud" it's a spotlight. im hiding nothing; im emphasizing why i placed my vote. if u think it is horrible, perhaps u should explain why???
Post
Post #68 (isolation #17) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:16 am
Postby androgybee »
and when we said "I actually think you are onto something." we were agreeing with the reasoning KainTepes put forth. it was an odd post he called out and we agreed it deserved a vote so we voted u but then RB here had to go and one-up u
Post
Post #72 (isolation #19) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:20 am
Postby androgybee »
In post 70, RhazhBash wrote:Not sure if androgyny is scum or Town trying too hard.
another excellent post which discredits but fails to address anything concrete. and by excellent i mean terrible. i'm town, so tell me, why am i "trying too hard". should i be trying less hard? wtf is ur point m9? could you maybe actually address the fact that i questioned what you were trying to do with 38 or do u just wanna continue to try and brush me off?
hint: brushing me off by saying im scum won't work. u already have 3 people voting u and I am very persistent. ur probably gonna wanna consider a change of strategy here.
In post 33, KainTepes wrote:VOTE: SOREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why do you ask 'would you rvs???' meaning???
I actually think you are onto something.
VOTE: Soren
Which would be?
In post 39, androgybee wrote:my god what a terrible post. what are you trying to do with that post? are you trying to discredit us? are you trying to throw shade? how rude. lemme tell u something Rhazh my newest pal; shadiness is a trait I like in trees and little else.
VOTE: RhazhBash
to answer ur question tho we did feel the Soren vote was legit. but a u vote is now even more legit. like, full tiers of legit-ness above the soren vote. it's really quite something.
That's a lot of questions to shroud over your horrible vote. I'm keeping my vote on you.
the questions were for realsies and also designed to highlight the lame-ness of the post i was calling out. it's not a "shroud" it's a spotlight. im hiding nothing; im emphasizing why i placed my vote. if u think it is horrible, perhaps u should explain why???
~Nahdia
It's horrible because you never really explained your vote and when questioned on it, instead of answering you shrouded it in questions.
In post 68, androgybee wrote:and when we said "I actually think you are onto something." we were agreeing with the reasoning KainTepes put forth. it was an odd post he called out and we agreed it deserved a vote so we voted u but then RB here had to go and one-up u
~Nahdia
Why do you agree on it? What was odd about that pinged you?
In post 69, androgybee wrote:tell me Soren, why do you jump to RhazhBash's defense? do you townread them?
In post 70, RhazhBash wrote:Not sure if androgyny is scum or Town trying too hard.
another excellent post which discredits but fails to address anything concrete. and by excellent i mean terrible. i'm town, so tell me, why am i "trying too hard". should i be trying less hard? wtf is ur point m9? could you maybe actually address the fact that i questioned what you were trying to do with 38 or do u just wanna continue to try and brush me off?
hint: brushing me off by saying im scum won't work. u already have 3 people voting u and I am very persistent. ur probably gonna wanna consider a change of strategy here.
im not gonna respond to this individually but just make a note of the fact that you're trying to make a scumread on someone for not having day 3 level read depth before the 5th page of day 1. i'm trying to get better about not just OMGUS'ing people but holy fuck what a terrible read dude. reads at this stage in the game do not have an incredible depth of logic. they are tonal. and quite frankly, i don't bother to explain because i have no need to. either you take my word for it or you don't; forcing a bunch of crappy reasons or even just saying "tonal read tonal read tonal read tonal read" over and over is a waste of my time and really shouldn't be convincing you any further if you weren't already gonna consider my opinion.
also ha-fucking-ha at accusing my head of scum acting. here u go:
Post
Post #94 (isolation #22) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:22 pm
Postby androgybee »
i understand the concept must be hard for u soren bc u clearly do not have one but there it is. i can link some sicknasty wikipedia pages if that helps too (=
In post 72, androgybee wrote:another excellent post which discredits but fails to address anything concrete. and by excellent i mean terrible. i'm town, so tell me, why am i "trying too hard". should i be trying less hard? wtf is ur point m9? could you maybe actually address the fact that i questioned what you were trying to do with 38 or do u just wanna continue to try and brush me off?
hint: brushing me off by saying im scum won't work. u already have 3 people voting u and I am very persistent. ur probably gonna wanna consider a change of strategy here.
~Nahdia
So Andro – if you are scum-reading Rhaz why are you suggesting he change tactics? Would scum read Rhaz suddenly complying with your request make you think he’s less likely to be scum?
telling him brushing us off wouldn't work wasn't exactly something we put a large amount of thought into, it was essentially banter. i get that you have the whole "logicbot" schtick going on but don't try to apply that to everyone else. not every single letter of every single post has a conscious reason for existing.
Another question – you’ve intimated you think Soren was defending Rhaz in a manner that was worth deeper questioning. Do you think there is any chance that Soren is scum? Because this post’s tone is pure “back off Town”.
in the opening stages of the game, we identified Soren and Rhazh as two individual scumreads (though it being the
very beginning
of the game these were/are ofc highly subject to change as events develop). so yes, we think there's a chance Soren is scum. that last post was just me saying he's wrong, not making a statement/implication as to his alignment. if you want to read into it excessively though;
whether he's town or he's scum, pushing me is probably a really bad idea.
Post
Post #112 (isolation #26) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:33 am
Postby androgybee »
In post 111, Nahdia wrote:If me making "personal attacks" against people via bantering is a partner tell, you will soon find I am in fact partneted with literally everyone, Kangay
In post 106, androgybee wrote:in the opening stages of the game, we identified Soren and Rhazh as two individual scumreads (though it being the very beginning of the game these were/are ofc highly subject to change as events develop). so yes, we think there's a chance Soren is scum. that last post was just me saying he's wrong, not making a statement/implication as to his alignment. if you want to read into it excessively though;
whether he's town or he's scum, pushing me is probably a really bad idea.
~Nahdia
If they are possible partners Soren is chainsawing pretty hard for Rhazh. This is a Micro game so I wouldn't put that out of the question but I think at this stage if only one of them is scum it is more likely to be Soren. Because his attack on you could just as easily be "Defend the Townie for cred". Yes .. inherent in that analysis is that I have you as a Town read for that to be a believable scenario.
yes, he could be defending the townie. we weren't saying he's clearly defending his partner, we were just saying the fact that Soren defended Rhazh when those two were the two individual scumreads we had (not a team read) was interesting and we wanted to see why.
Post
Post #157 (isolation #30) » Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:22 am
Postby androgybee »
Actually I have a bit of time right now. What's up? I liked A Real Scrooge's catchup. Liked Jeanne in that slot too so I'm relatively confident in that slot being town. Rhazh has improved a bit but scum getting townier when they get called out isn't uncommon. My vote on them was really early though so I'll have to put some serious thought into re-evaluating that. MoI may think 152 is a contradiction but I see where they're coming from. Soren has continued to look kinda scummy to me today but I don't really wanna end the day atm. I think random's read on me was just meta which doesn't mean much to me. If u have anything from this game u want me to respond to I will. Not sure I can read MoI's slot on d1. ZZZX slot is a wildcard and since I to feel like a decent number of people here are kinda towny I want something from that slot since I don't want to just have to guess him by PoE.
Post
Post #169 (isolation #33) » Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:57 pm
Postby androgybee »
i can post a bit. sorry for not being more active here im in a lot of games and was really hopign my other head would share the weight but they got rly sick i guess =(
In post 166, A Real Scourge wrote:what about my catchup did you like, exactly? and what did Jeanne do that made you like our slot from that?
i liked ur 134. looked like genuine sorting thought process. and in general u shared some of my opinions.
beeboy and i were of the opinion that Jeanne was probably town because they didn't seem to be fakeclaiming with the post restriction thing and that sort of negative utility is very very very rarely scum.
Post
Post #205 (isolation #37) » Sun Apr 10, 2016 4:28 am
Postby androgybee »
might have something to do with the fact that i've said i've felt better about Rhazh's slot but my vote was still there and now others are hopping on the wagon.