Mini 1782 Game Over

[RadiantCowbells]

VOTE: APF

Sketchy as hell.

[Jake from State Farm]

No, RC, Jake is obvtown.

Flattery will get you everywhere

[mhsmith0]

No, RC, Jake is obvtown.

2. No provable randomness! This especially includes dice tags!

Guess it's to... roll the dice

Yet another reason why this needs pre-rope.

That doesn't count!
~Ircher

Lowell's avatar is dice. Then again if I have to explain the joke there is no joke . Also should have been "guess it's time to..."

[shaddowez]

Lowell's avatar is dice. Then again if I have to explain the joke there is no joke . Also should have been "guess it's time to..."

The missing word threw me off for a minute, but I really hope I wasn't the only one that actually got it.

[a plain farmer]

Shaddowez is hard-defending and RC's scrambling to put up a pre-counterwagon.

Looks like we've got our scum team, fellas.

[Roshar]

/confirming

Also, I wouldn't policy lynch. I've played with young players (Isn't Kein 13?) and I'd usually only jump the wagon if 1)it's later in the game and we don't have any strong leads and 2) said player is bringing the game down 3) if lynching them would clear up a lot of info.

Shaddowez is hard-defending and RC's scrambling to put up a pre-counterwagon.

Looks like we've got our scum team, fellas.

But you're hard-defending.


@Plain farmer, how old are you if you don't mind me asking. Trying to put things in perspective.

[Frozen Angel]

/confirming

Also, I wouldn't policy lynch. I've played with young players (Isn't Kein 13?) and I'd usually only jump the wagon if 1)it's later in the game and we don't have any strong leads and 2) said player is bringing the game down 3) if lynching them would clear up a lot of info.

Shaddowez is hard-defending and RC's scrambling to put up a pre-counterwagon.

Looks like we've got our scum team, fellas.

But you're hard-defending.


@Plain farmer, how old are you if you don't mind me asking. Trying to put things in perspective.

/confirming

What a bad post

so you say he is a bad player but needs to live till the end to be omitted? policy lynches should happen as fast as possible or they will be tools for scum to just end game. I hate policy lynches anyway so...

Why is age even mater?

Pre vote Roshar

[Roshar]

@Frozen

Age is because I've found that many players I've played with are really young and while their play style can be annoying, it helps me differentiate between noobish and suspicious behavior. So, if posts come from a 13 year old, I'll be less likely to jump to a conclusion than if they came from a 30 year old. The three most..."difficult" players I've played with turned out to be really young. So yes, I give

some

leeway to younger individuals based on my experiences.

so you say he is a bad player but needs to live till the end to be omitted?

^No, that's not what I said. I know you have hard feelings towards Kein, but this is pushing it.

Lynching someone purely because their annoying isn't how I do things. Now IF l was undecided about them (they remained unreadable), with no stronger leads and they were hindering the discussion, I may consider lynching them to clear up suspicion and move forward, but not before I've actually looked for mafia and failed to find a stronger candidate.

Scum may use them, yes. But usually that's not as easy to do for scum. What you usually do is keep an eye out for interactions with said player. Also, not advocating keeping them alive until later in the game, but if you have no reason for lynching the player other than them being annoying, I won't lynch them.

[Frozen Angel]

I'm strongly against all kind of policy lynches. I was just pointing out the paradox in what you said. if your suggesting a policy lynch and you say it must w8 till end game , thats not suggesting a policy lynch. thats keeping a prepared meat for a late feast - easy win...

[Clumsy]

Age does matter. It's another variable that can lead to conclusions about actions of people. As much as we like to say so, age, gender, all play a part. A small part, but a part.

That said, I'm against policy lynching Kain. Very against it actually. I don't like policy lynches in general. As well as the fact that it seems like Kain is trying to improve their play. If policy lynches happen again and again, how does one improve? A chance must be given, a possibility of potential must be made possible. I'm not everyone here, but I will not put my vote in for Kain as a policy lynch.

Friendly Co-Mod Dier posts here to remind himself to track this thread.

FOS: Dier

Only scum talks in third person!

On a serious note, 12 person games are usually 3 scum right? Newbies are 9 with 2. And no I'm not joking.

A lot of names I've seen around from reading other games. Excited to be in here with you! Happy Scum-hunting!

[Frozen Angel]

yeah 3 mafia is a norm for mini normal setups

[mhsmith0]

wrt the policy lynch debate, did people think RC was serious with that suggestion on Kain? I read that as a joke/reaction test.

[Clumsy]

Friendly Co-Mod Dier posts here to remind himself to track this thread.

Thank you. Sorry for a stupid question. >_<

And yes I thought it was serious. Was it RC?

[a plain farmer]

But you're hard-defending.

Are you referring to 16? All I was saying there is that you can try to PL Kain, but he might deflect it like a blaster bolt off a lightsabre.

@Plain farmer, how old are you if you don't mind me asking. Trying to put things in perspective.

Twice as old as Kain, apparently. Does this help?

[a plain farmer]

Clumsy, I feel that your name should have a 'b' in it.

You can follow the wise precedent set by such words as "bomb" and "crumb".

It's probably not too late to create an account called Clumbsy.

[Roshar]

I'm strongly against all kind of policy lynches. I was just pointing out the paradox in what you said. if your suggesting a policy lynch and you say it must w8 till end game , thats not suggesting a policy lynch. thats keeping a prepared meat for a late feast - easy win...

Except I'm not suggesting one...

It's not exactly a policy lynch if you're voting for someone because 30+ pages in, they remain unreadable, and you have no stronger suspect. That would be your strongest suspect.

And I never said keep them alive until end game. I said I won't lynch a player based on an annoying playstyle (erratic, random, can't be held accountable b/c what they say has very little rhyme or reason) early on for said reason. I'd consider it later on only if they remain unreadable which to me is suspicious. So again, not exactly a policy lynch.

To clarify, if said player behaved in a way I found suspicious to warrant a vote on Day 1, I'd have no problem going for them.


@Plain farmer I meant post 29. Was that post sarcasm by any chance?

[a plain farmer]

Only to the extent that shaddowez was absolutely going to the mat for his bud, smith.

[mhsmith0]

Only to the extent that shaddowez was absolutely going to the mat for his bud, smith.

Lowell's avatar is dice. Then again if I have to explain the joke there is no joke . Also should have been "guess it's time to..."

The missing word threw me off for a minute, but I really hope I wasn't the only one that actually got it.

??? do you consider that "going to the mat"?

[RadiantCowbells]

I'm pretty sure APF is scum and it's only page 2.

[Roshar]

Ah, I see.

Pre-Vote: A plain farmer

Two reasons 1) it's an over-the-top rebuttal for a very weak case on mhsmith 2) I see no real conviction behind it.

[Frozen Angel]

Hey RC

Roshar I like your avatar really much:]

What case against mhsmith?

[Frozen Angel]

APS is just branching around the bushes

he basically called half of the playerlist scum right now ...

[Frozen Angel]

I'm not sure how I missed F with S ... :/

[RadiantCowbells]

Hi, FA!

[Clumsy]

Clumsy, I feel that your name should have a 'b' in it.

You can follow the wise precedent set by such words as "bomb" and "crumb".

It's probably not too late to create an account called Clumbsy.

If I did this, I'd read anyone saying my name like they had a really nasely cold.