In post 443, Creature wrote:In post 94, RaisusTheFlammie wrote:Personally, I'm not sure, there's just something about your responses that just don't sit right with me.
Fence-sitting, but again shows he's keeping an eye on pisskop/Titus.
RaisusTheFlammie
Maybe you could mention what don't sit right with you?
I personally don't like RVS simply because 9 out of 10 times we lynch a townie... (since we really don't have enough to go on other than hunches)
Seemed like an opinion to me.
In post 444, Creature wrote:In post 98, RaisusTheFlammie wrote:@pisskop, because, as far as I'm concerned, not responding is anti-town
In post 102, RaisusTheFlammie wrote:Nah, you just made it clear exactly what your motives are and I don't like it.
In post 105, RaisusTheFlammie wrote:In post 103, pisskop wrote:Right.
Your whole interaction with me is an example of noncomittence and dodgery.
Give me one example of non-commitance, just one. Seems to me like you're intentionally trying to deflect pressure away fromYOUinstead.
Tunneling on pisskop, but I am still not sure why besides PK not responding to him. RTF, could you say more about this?
In post 445, Creature wrote:RaisusTheFlammie
About post #264:
Do you still believe in a KT/(PK/Titus) scum team?
If yes, what more posts you can see they're buddying?
If no, then what's your new bet?
In post 446, Creature wrote:Woops, my bad, I mean't KT/ZZZX.