RVS.
Not sure what the point of this is, I think it's just a "this game is starting and it's big".
Prodging. No content yet.
Still no content.
In post 209, Creature wrote: In post 184, SirCakez wrote:Creature do something. Even Snarky is being more useful then you.
Slandaar is a stinky wagon.
If Slandaar is a stinky wagon, then what is a good wagon for you? Slandaar has only asked questions so far, but I didn't see him bothering to even answer his own questions. I don't mind pushing him, even if there's a Golden Robster voting him.
Also, why were you referencing Snarky?
In post 189, Kop wrote:I think some votes may force the issue.
VOTE: Creature
What about you? Do you have your own opinions? If your only post is an opportunistic vote, then there's something wrong with you.
In post 193, Egg wrote:Creature, wanna answer my question? Also, any thoughts on the game? Reads on Jam and Ness? Thoughts on their wagons?
Do you think there's something wrong with post #9? I had no intention behind that post. I am waiting the game go on a bit, I'll slowly take a look.
So far:
Ness - Typical panicking. Well, so far his behavior matches with his scum play, but I need to take a look at his town behavior and see what matches more.
Jam - Newbscum for me. I see hesitation on his initial posts to accuse someone, I also think he's pretending to be stupid. His vote on Golden seems sheepy (sheeping Snarky).
Jam
How much experience do you have in Mafia?
Push on Slandaar is weak and doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Questioning to Kop is oddly defensive (and calling a naked vote on him "opportunistic" is also weird).
Even if it really seems like it, it's bad to accuse a newbie of playing the newb card.
In post 210, Creature wrote: In post 208, iraonavp wrote: In post 206, Fraggernaut wrote:Also combine that with the fact that I know Golden Robster (from my recently finished game I modded. that they were involved in) is more then capable of providing information to help town & being a town leader.
But he still could be a town-aligned player who isn't making much of an effort, right? That's the conclusion I've reached, at least.
Isn't that the same as saying someone could still be a town-aligned player who is being very scummy?
No, it's not the same.
In post 220, Creature wrote: In post 217, Egg wrote:Creature, you said "here we go" on Page 1. I was mostly trying to figure out if that had to do with anything specific or if it was the game starting in general. And if it was general, was it meant with excitement for the game starting or was it more of a concern for something that may have been coming.
Yeah, it was about the game starting in general. I wasn't that excited though.
This is fair, I guess.
In post 227, Creature wrote: In post 224, Slandaar wrote: In post 220, Creature wrote: In post 217, Egg wrote:Creature, you said "here we go" on Page 1. I was mostly trying to figure out if that had to do with anything specific or if it was the game starting in general. And if it was general, was it meant with excitement for the game starting or was it more of a concern for something that may have been coming.
Yeah, it was about the game starting in general. I wasn't that excited though.
Hello Creature.
I mean that you could share what do you think rather than asking some of the questions.
Though this is backtracking and changing what you meant, it is a valid point and I had the same feeling toward Slandaar.
In post 231, Creature wrote:Yes, I am. Although, I am more active in this forums (for some reason).
Fluff.
Prodging.
In post 357, Creature wrote:Like the way Kop's only post is a sheepy vote. Hope this prod makes him speak more.
Feels a bit like fixating on Kop for naked voting him.
This isn't really true and it makes me wonder how closely Creature's been reading.
In post 361, Creature wrote: In post 258, Slandaar wrote: In post 227, Creature wrote:I mean that you could share what do you think rather than asking some of the questions.
My priority is to find scum not to let you know what I think. To find scum I shall ask questions. Why didn't you ask me my opinion(s) if you find the opinion(s) I chose not to post important?
Seems fair, but I think you could've commented on some things you find strange.
It's notable that Creature here asks Slandaar to comment not on his reads but on "things he finds strange"... there's more to analysis than than and I wonder if Creature is just afraid of being caught.
Fine.
Fine. At least he admits he's not caught up.
This doesn't make any sense. It was an unforced claim and therefore you can look at the motivation behind it. Rather, if it were a forced claim then you couldn't get a read from the fact that he claimed.
This is a stupid response to a stupid question.
._.
In post 429, Creature wrote: In post 236, Egg wrote:Creature, how many games have you played? Do you prefer being town or scum? Does being scum make you feel more nervous or confident (or if you've never been scum, which do you think would be true?.
In this site I completed one game and am playing this and 3 others.
I prefer being town because when I am lynched my play will be accepted next game.
Depends, I start nervous, go confident a little then nervous again, but it doesn't differ too much from my town play.
Also, pretty sure the size of the posts is not alignment indicative.
Reasonable.
In post 430, Creature wrote:
The only reason you're scum reading me is because I didn't answer his question soon?
Too defensive.
I could understand this after Drixx's entrance.
In post 437, Creature wrote: In post 435, Drixx wrote:
Oh hey look. He gets called scum by SirCakez and takes the opportunity to jump on an easy wagon. No correlation though, amirite?
Since when I am forbidden from scum reading you?
Strangely defensive, also notable that he didn't even mention the weakness of Drixx's argument here.
In post 438, Creature wrote:If you notice, SirCakez is only scum reading easy mislynch targets.
Oh this is awful. How, given your significant lack of scumhunting this game, can you suddenly determine who is an easy mislynch target? I don't believe in scumslips but this is pretty awful.
This didn't actually address the question.
Ugh.
That's a nice OMGUS you got there.
