Mini 1777: Varied Music Mafia: Finale

Thurhame · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:50 am

You may consider my intent stated, however, if anyone else brings Snarky to L-1.

SnarkySnowman · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:13 am

In post 625, Thurhame wrote:You may consider my intent stated, however, if anyone else brings Snarky to L-1.

Weak

As

Shit

Aristophanes · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:27 am

In post 624, Thurhame wrote:
In post 622, Aristophanes wrote:Also, care to claim? Intent has been given.

No it hasn't. I made that mistake once on my own wagon; I'm not making it again.

Right, but you have intent to L-1, and we are assuming a quickhammer if that happens. So that is essentially intent to me.

SnarkySnowman wrote:Me claiming at this point would be anti-town. Stop rolefishing. Start explaining why I'm a better lynch (read: a policy lynch for lack of activity) than an actually scummy player, who might give us info if they flip, even if they don't flip scum?

I'm not rolefishing.

I don't disagree that we will get more info from a Thur flip, but using that as a reason to not lynch you (read: the only content you've given all game) is really bad. To lurk this hard, then say "but I've lurked so hard I'm not worth lynching,' feels more like a scum tactic than town being genuine.

Aristophanes · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:28 am

In post 625, Thurhame wrote:You may consider my intent stated, however, if anyone else brings Snarky to L-1.

Missed this post.
So you have pre-intent.
Good enough for me.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 11:33 am

Varied Music Mafia:

Votecount #2.26:

SnarkySnowman (4): GuyFawkes, camn, Almost50, Aristophanes
Thurhame (2): Katsuki, duppin,
Aristophanes (1): iraonavp
Katsuki (1): Zulfy
Almost50 (1): SnarkySnowman
duppin (0):
GuyFawkes (0):
Zulfy (0):
iraonavp (0):
camn (0):

Not voting: Thurhame

With 10 alive it's 6 to lynch.

Night falls in (expired on 2016-04-08 21:00:00).

Song:

Simon & Garfunkel: Sounds of Silence

Notes:

This one's from me!

Zulfy the cheeky fucker has replaced The Archmage Ludicrous!

Zulfy · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 11:46 am

It is I.

The Cheekiest.

Almost50 · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:14 pm

Hi there Zulfy. You didn't get to complete our previous game together, so -after this one- I will say I've played only once with you

Zulfy · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:23 pm

VOTE: Camn

Zulfy · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:24 pm

In post 631, Almost50 wrote:Hi there Zulfy. You didn't get to complete our previous game together, so -after this one- I will say I've played only once with you

It's nice to see you again. You're an interesting player.

Almost50 · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 12:34 pm

In post 633, Zulfy wrote:It's nice to see you again. You're an interesting player.

LOL. Yeah, I tend to leave my mark. Some really hate it, but -fortunately- most don't mind.

So.. would you care to explain that vote on camn?

camn · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 1:10 pm

He's just scared cuz of our last game together

Aristophanes · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 1:53 pm

In post 630, Zulfy wrote:It is I.

The Cheekiest.

Are you stalking me?

Zulfy · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 3:16 pm

I must lynch you in all timelines, Aris

iraonavp · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:56 pm

In post 590, Almost50 wrote:
In post 586, iraonavp wrote:If SnarkySnowman is the serial killer, why not lynch him?
Like, if you narrowed him down that well, surely he's better than an information lynch.

Are you scum hunting or are you wagon dissolving/redirecting? You're posting loads to discredit someone's reads and question them w/o offering much. If you're willing to lynch SS, go ahead and place your vote on him. If you don't see my case on him (as you hinted by doubting me limiting it down to SS/camn in the first place) then stop trying to take votes off the Thur wagon and redirecting them "elsewhere".

You didn't make any case, you just said that SnarkySnowman was the serial killer. I don't think you should vote him because I don't have a read on him but you seemed to have a very strong read on him, that's why I asked the question.

You see, your miller claim is the only thing stopping me from leading a wagon on you at this point. It kind of gives you "some" space. However, it cannot hold forever, and -at some point- I might be tempted to overlook that as well.

Right now you're not a prime suspect on my list, so let's keep it that way and hope I'm right.

I mean, this is magnitudes higher on any Scum Manipulation scale than what I said earlier.

And it looks like you've just responded to everything else with some irrelevant Poe's Law sarcastic bullshit which quite honestly makes me think that if you are town-aligned, then yes, you are so bad at this game.

Could you just explain why you think SnarkySnowman is scum-aligned, thanks.

iraonavp · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:59 pm

In post 616, duppin wrote:Well I've played with you before. Why is your playstyle so weird this game?

What makes you think it's playstyle? Serious question.

iraonavp · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:00 pm

SnarkySnowman, just post more about why Aristophanes is scum-aligned and the town-aligned players on your wagon will unvote you. Then we can lynch Aristophanes.

duppin · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:58 am

In post 639, iraonavp wrote:
In post 616, duppin wrote:Well I've played with you before. Why is your playstyle so weird this game?

What makes you think it's playstyle? Serious question.

I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean?

camn · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:47 am

In post 640, iraonavp wrote:Then we can lynch Aristophanes

I want this.

SnarkySnowman · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 4:50 am

In post 642, camn wrote:
In post 640, iraonavp wrote:Then we can lynch Aristophanes

I want this.

Then why the shit are you voting me?

camn · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 5:01 am

You should also die, that's why.

Aristophanes · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:41 am

In post 641, duppin wrote:
In post 639, iraonavp wrote:
In post 616, duppin wrote:Well I've played with you before. Why is your playstyle so weird this game?

What makes you think it's playstyle? Serious question.

I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean?

He is asking why you think this is a playstyle issue not an issue of scumminess.
I gather that in saying "playstyle" he thinks you are creating a preemptive reason for me to get out of a scumread. Which my response follows perfectly.

Therefore, I must ask, is the difference in my play scummy to you?

camn · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:44 am

It is to me.

Aristophanes · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:46 am

In post 646, camn wrote:It is to me.

And I appreciate your persistence in the matter.

However, it is incorrect.

Aristophanes · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:54 pm

I'm tired, drunk, and listening to Taylor Swift.
Half of those will help me, half will hinder me.

Imma see if I can make my Thur case.
I'm still totally happy with a Snarky lynch though.

@Snarky,
can we have your reads before you go? They may help a lot post flip.

Almost50 · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:12 pm

In post 648, Aristophanes wrote:I'm tired, drunk, and listening to Taylor Swift.
Half of those will help me, half will hinder me.

I get that "tired" will hinder you, and I get that one of being drunk or listening to Taylor Swift will help you.

What I don't understand is the "half will do this and half will do the opposite", considering you only listed 3 elements.