So at first I was confused as to why this was the leading wagon, so I assumed it was just some Day 1 pressure being thrown around. And then I read the ISO of Creature, and oo boy.
In 433, Creature says "Two stones, one scum" and votes for Drixx, which is some strange cryptic thing that has no apparent meaning.
Then he
gets pissy when Drixx basically says his vote was bullshit, and he
turns tail and scum reads SirCakez in the
. Lo and behold, he moves his vote to SirCakez
a few posts later, with the apparent reason of two quotes, one of which being his own.
Not really building a case against SirCakez, edits one of his quotes as a "joke," and just kinda makes some lazy comments about SirCakez just being scum, as if he's just sitting there watching him be scum and nobody is doing anything about it.
He makes the claim that Kop's vote on him seemed opportunistic, although Kop was the second person on his wagon, and stayed on until now.
3/5 of
his scumreads are on his wagon, just lol.
He finally
gives us an explanation of that cryptic two stones one scum line, and honestly I'm even more confused than I was when he said the line in the first place. Even worse in this post he claims Drixx has been pretending to claim survivor, but I don't see that anywhere in this game, aside from a joke that some player made to Drixx.
This post, where he outlines a case against KAAG, made me cringe a little bit. Or a lot of bit. Now I'm not going to go out of my way to shoot down his arguments against another player, but a lot of them read to me like this:
KAAG in a post:
You lied, I didn't do _______ at all.
Creature's response:
Yeah-huh.
KAAG in a post:
You did this scummy thing.
Creature:
Nuh-huh, I just didn't know what was going on!
etc., And so forth.
Now rather than link to his 500, I'm going to break this down, because his response (to Egg making a case that his nervousness early game seems to be from him being a scum, and being nervous about playing scum) just does
not
make sense:
I'll just admit: I feel the same nervousness when I am town too. I have difficulty to make a good post initially and I don't accept being mislynched D1. If you want to lynch me, at least you'll learn this is my typical town play. Take my reads seriously, they're not detailed as you would expect, but it's already an idea.
Let's take this one step at a time.
I'll just admit: I feel the same nervousness when I am town too.
"Nuh-huh! What you think is a scum read is really just my town play!" And even if you don't agree with me when I think that's what this sentence sounds like, just the way this sentence is structured is weird. Just admitting something? As if it's a confession? It's just a weird and awkward defense.
I have difficulty to make a good post initially and
I don't accept being mislynched D1.
If you want to lynch me,
at least you'll learn this is my typical town play.
Is it just me or does this literally say, "I really don't like to be mislynched, but if you do then oh well, at least we all learn something!"? I mean, not only is that an obvious sentiment (because nobody likes being mislynched), but it's flat out contradictory. Especially when you consider his
429, where he even points out the upside to being lynched as adding to his meta (and note he says lynched and not mislynched). Make up your mind: Do you want to be alive and not "mislynched," or do you not care if you die for the sake of adding to your meta?
Take my reads seriously, they're not detailed as you would expect, but it's already an idea.
I honestly couldn't tell you what this meant if you paid me. Is this just an excuse for lazy scumhunting? Or lackluster posting? Why say to take your reads seriously rather than building better, and real cases on them?
And how am I supposed to take your reads seriously? You only build ONE real case against any player (KAAG), and you're not even voting for them. Instead, your voting for your other scumread, who you need to elaborate more on, or make a case against.
