Mini 1777: Varied Music Mafia: Finale

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:16 am

Varied Music Mafia:

Votecount #2.28:

SnarkySnowman (5): GuyFawkes, camn, Almost50, Aristophanes, Zulfy
Thurhame (2): Katsuki, duppin
Aristophanes (2): iraonavp, SnarkySnowman
Almost50 (0):
Katsuki (0):
duppin (0):
GuyFawkes (0):
Zulfy (0):
iraonavp (0):
camn (0):

Not voting: Thurhame

With 10 alive it's 6 to lynch.

Night falls in (expired on 2016-04-08 21:00:00).

Song:

The Payolas - Eyes Of A Stranger

Notes:

On request!

Guyfawkes has been prodded.

Thurhame · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:52 am

Intent to Hammer: SnarkySnowman

SnarkySnowman · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:56 am

Katsuki · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:38 am

In post 660, camn wrote:Kats- will you put Snowman at L-1 please? Everyone is afraid you will lolhammer again.

I haven't been following. Now that my other game's over, why are we voting snarky?

Zulfy · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:38 am

In post 677, SnarkySnowman wrote:Why

The unwillingness to claim is noted on both ends

Aristophanes · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:17 pm

In post 678, Katsuki wrote:
In post 660, camn wrote:Kats- will you put Snowman at L-1 please? Everyone is afraid you will lolhammer again.

I haven't been following. Now that my other game's over, why are we voting snarky?

He has done jack shit!
He isn't scumhunting, he isn't defending himself, he is literally just proddodging.
Read his ISO. It will take you under a minute.
Then tell me why we shouldn't lynch him.

Snarky, claim?
Or at least an elaboration on how that would be antitown.

Katsuki · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:43 pm

Given how Thur jumped on that wagon I'm wont to predict it'll end in a mislynch.

camn · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:49 pm

Let's swing it back to Aristophanes then!

Katsuki · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:52 pm

Why are you so adamant against lynching Thur??

Zulfy · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:52 pm

there is no turning back

camn · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:04 pm

I'm not totally opposed.
He just seems way more town than these other guys!

Katsuki · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:32 pm

ISO'd Snarky, ya not interested in hammering.

I'm also not seeing what everyone is seeing about Aris being scummy. :/

Still willing to further camn's wincon.

Lets lynch Thur though.

Aristophanes · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:57 pm

In post 686, Katsuki wrote:ISO'd Snarky, ya not interested in hammering.

I'm also not seeing what everyone is seeing about Aris being scummy. :/

Still willing to further camn's wincon.

Lets lynch Thur though.

K
VOTE: Thur
Scum lynch I'm confident in > lurker lynch even Kats won't hammer.

iraonavp · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:19 pm

VOTE: Zulfaristophanes

iraonavp · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:20 pm

In post 641, duppin wrote:
In post 639, iraonavp wrote:
In post 616, duppin wrote:Well I've played with you before. Why is your playstyle so weird this game?

What makes you think it's playstyle? Serious question.

I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean?

Why is it playstyle as opposed to a difference in alignment?

iraonavp · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:21 pm

In post 649, Almost50 wrote:

In post 638, iraonavp wrote:Could you just explain why you think SnarkySnowman is scum-aligned, thanks.

iraonavp · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:22 pm

In post 684, Zulfy wrote:there is no turning back

Why

Aristophanes · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:27 pm

In post 688, iraonavp wrote:VOTE: Zulfaristophanes

Being ambiguous, I assume this will be counted as an unvote.
What was the point?

iraonavp · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:27 pm

VOTE: Aristophanes

Aristophanes · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:35 pm

In post 693, iraonavp wrote:VOTE: Aristophanes

Cool.
Your vote was already here until that last post, so idgaf really.

I'm neither scum, nor trolling.
This wagon is misguided and you should vote for Thur.

Willing to compromise on Snarky.

What is so hard about this?

duppin · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:15 pm

In post 689, iraonavp wrote:
In post 641, duppin wrote:
In post 639, iraonavp wrote:
In post 616, duppin wrote:Well I've played with you before. Why is your playstyle so weird this game?

What makes you think it's playstyle? Serious question.

I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean?

Why is it playstyle as opposed to a difference in alignment?

Isn't that still his playstyle then? In either case his play has been completely different. I doubt his sudden change has anything to do with his alignment and he also claimed he has been playing pretty weird in his last couple of games so meh.

GuyFawkes · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:45 pm

I'm going to take a closer look at the people derailing the snarky wagon

how much time do we have before deadline?

Thurhame · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:49 pm

No response/claim from Snarky despite being active elsewhere on the site.

VOTE: SnarkySnowman

Thurhame · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:52 pm

Deadline is 10:00 PM Friday EDT (2:00 AM Saturday UTS), so a little over 2 and a half days left.

Katsuki · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:24 am

In post 697, Thurhame wrote:No response/claim from Snarky despite being active elsewhere on the site.

VOTE: SnarkySnowman

I had taken a look at this and it doesn't appear to be the case to me.

I would've hammered had ELLITELL applied.