Mini 1782 Game Over

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:41 am

What?

Frozen Angel · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:42 am

If you have point related to game why you want to w8 till end game?

shaddowez · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:47 am

In post 523, Frozen Angel wrote:I don't like the fact your absent and distanced and suddenly appear to wine why someone is pushing a policy...

How am I absent and distant? You seem to be defending RC an awful lot, for what appears to be no good reason.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:48 am

In post 526, Frozen Angel wrote:If you have point related to game why you want to w8 till end game?

It's not necessarily related to the game per se. Plus I need to know his alignment first.

Frozen Angel · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:48 am

In post 527, shaddowez wrote:
In post 523, Frozen Angel wrote:I don't like the fact your absent and distanced and suddenly appear to wine why someone is pushing a policy...
How am I absent and distant? You seem to be defending RC an awful lot, for what appears to be no good reason.

What I'm doing is not defending RC,

I'm attacking you

Frozen Angel · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:49 am

In post 528, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 526, Frozen Angel wrote:If you have point related to game why you want to w8 till end game?

It's not necessarily related to the game per se. Plus I need to know his alignment first.

I'm curios

what is it going to be if he flips town?

what is it going to be if he flips scum?

shaddowez · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:49 am

And not answering my question

Frozen Angel · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:50 am

what did I missed? your absent and distanced obviously. do you want me to quote your whole ISO ?

shaddowez · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:55 am

In post 358, Maverick1102 wrote:I hate that my read has changed so quickly, but I quite like the logic in that from Roshar. UNVOTE: APF

VOTE: Clumsy

@Maverick

- Is this just a pressure vote?

@Rosh

- You voted Clumsy in 353 for an opportunistic vote, and subsequent posts make it sound like you have other scumreads. Is there a reason you're vote parked on somebody who isn't posting?

shaddowez · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:57 am

In post 532, Frozen Angel wrote:what did I missed? your absent and distanced obviously. do you want me to quote your whole ISO ?

I want you to explain what you mean...I'm here now, and when I can be, so claiming I'm absent makes no sense. And I'm really not sure what you mean by distant.

shaddowez · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:58 am

In post 534, shaddowez wrote:
In post 532, Frozen Angel wrote:what did I missed? your absent and distanced obviously. do you want me to quote your whole ISO ?

I want you to explain what you mean...I'm here now, and when I can be, so claiming I'm absent makes no sense. And I'm really not sure what you mean by distant.

Additionally, what do either of those have to do with me asking somebody about why they're pushing policy lynches above anything else?

Frozen Angel · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:00 am

In post 534, shaddowez wrote:
In post 532, Frozen Angel wrote:what did I missed? your absent and distanced obviously. do you want me to quote your whole ISO ?

I want you to explain what you mean...I'm here now, and when I can be, so claiming I'm absent makes no sense. And I'm really not sure what you mean by distant.

well absent doesn't mean your not here in this moment . It means you weren't around when any intractions was happening didn't commented on anything fres didn't engaged with anyone. the last means your distant.

Frozen Angel · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:04 am

In post 535, shaddowez wrote:
In post 534, shaddowez wrote:
In post 532, Frozen Angel wrote:what did I missed? your absent and distanced obviously. do you want me to quote your whole ISO ?

I want you to explain what you mean...I'm here now, and when I can be, so claiming I'm absent makes no sense. And I'm really not sure what you mean by distant.

Additionally, what do either of those have to do with me asking somebody about why they're pushing policy lynches above anything else?

I shared my feelings about both already. if you can't see that I'm null townlean on jake and scum lean on RC atm. RC plays seems a bit fake and closed that I'm not sure what is he trying to do and whats his agenda. plus RC is not suggesting policy lynches. he is not just playing open and you need analysing his posts to understand him - which is extremely hard becuase he is basically doing nothing.

and Jake push on RC is becuase he is afraid of RC play as both town and scum and he thinks RC didn't done anything to make him say otherwise.

none of them are policy lynches.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:31 am

In post 530, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 528, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 526, Frozen Angel wrote:If you have point related to game why you want to w8 till end game?

It's not necessarily related to the game per se. Plus I need to know his alignment first.

I'm curios

what is it going to be if he flips town?

what is it going to be if he flips scum?

Won't ask anything if he's scum.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:31 am

He being shadow.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:33 am

I'm not afraid of RC. Not sure where you got that from.

Frozen Angel · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:36 am

So do you think he made a bad town play there that you wanna comment on?

Frozen Angel · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:37 am

In post 427, Jake from State Farm wrote:assuming I hadn't read game my vote could be considered a random vote, because that is what people do at the beginning of each game. It was how I planned to start the game as soon as I saw RC was playing but everything in that statement is true based on my experiences which makes my vote serious. Some people may write it off as a grudge vote which would be a valid assumption as well, but imo he has no useful skills that is worthy keeping around if he is town and if he is scum you definitely want him gone ASAP. This is the guy who double bussed his mafia partners hard and convinced town to lynch a gunsmith clear (or maybe it was a cop) to win the game as scum. he is very manipulative and impossible to read as either alignment. He should absolutely be the lynch today and until I see posts from other people that make me think they may be a better lynch. I like my vote where it is at. I don't really think anything said pre-game is going to change my mind but if you disagree please feel free to provide me links or quotes of posts I should consider.

Kind of felt that way. No offense.

Maverick1102 · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:49 am

I like both the Nos and the JSF Wagons. I quite liked Froot Loops' reminder that 'Too scummy to be scum' isn't a thing, so I reread Jake in ISO. Despite a fair amount of posts in both pregame and D1, there is still very little to work with and if I'm honest, it seems like he's making it difficult to read him.

Would town do this? Probably not.

Jake appears to hunt for towncred, it just comes across as tone in some posts but in posts such as his #521, where he appears to overstate his usefulness to the town for brownie points:

I've already done more in this game than most of the other players because I have 2 scum reads and have voted both of them.

He also seems to be tunnelling on what is, to me at least, a quite weak argument, which seems like it led on from a serious push on a policy lynch (lynching a player because you know what they play like in other games pretty much amounts to policy lynching, imo.) that it seems clear he intended to push from pregame. I can't actually see why JSF is voting for mhsmith other than he dislikes readslists and they've butted heads a little bit. It's weak as hell and very tunnelly. A lot of what he makes is just noise and rather than trying to convince everybody else that his target is scum, he seems happy to merely go back-and-forth with mhsmith.

UNVOTE: Clumsy
VOTE: Jake from State Farm

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:55 am

In post 541, Frozen Angel wrote:So do you think he made a bad town play there that you wanna comment on?

Why does it matter?

Frozen Angel · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:56 am

I want to know what you think about others posts...

why does it matter?!

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:58 am

I've actually detailed why I'm voting mh.

Why do so many people have problem reading in this game?

P.edit - which posts do you want to know about? The one from shadow? I dont like it

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:00 am

In post 521, Jake from State Farm wrote:@mh. You say I'm not opening up but that isn't true. I've provided now 2 people I'm suspicious of. That's being pretty open. If you don't think I'm scum, why are you focusing so much attention on me? If you think I'm scum, why aren't you voting me? If I'm null then why are you focusing on just me? Earlier you said you haven't been able to figure RC out, yet I don't see you trying to figure him out. If you have stronger scum reads why are you not pressuring them?

I get it, I apparently annoy you for some reason, for what reason I have no idea. I've already done more in this game than most of the other players because I have 2 scum reads and have voted both of them.

You vote me right after the game started because I made a joke, you wanted to know when I was going to start providing content but the game had just started. That's an unrealistic expectation from you. If you were town
Imo you would have had a little more patience. This showed a little bit of opportunistic behavior especially since you said yourself you like to be slow with your votes. Looked like greedy scum to me.

Second, you mention I had a lot of posts that had no content but that's not true at all. You can't expect people to post pregame, it's optional and refusal to play pregame isn't alignment indicative.

Third, I find your unvote on me came due to pressure you were receiving from multiple players (nos/mav).

Fourth, you decided to come back to questioning me right after Nos starts questioning me asking me very similar questions as him.

All of this leads me to believe you aren't genuine in your actions and you are probably scum.

Hey Maverick. Did you seriously not see this post?

Frozen Angel · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:01 am

In post 546, Jake from State Farm wrote:P.edit - which posts do you want to know about? The one from shadow? I dont like it

I precisely want to know why.

Lowell · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:02 am

I've totally lost the trail in this game. Hell.