In post 384, Alexcellent wrote:Maxous - has your tex read changed at all? Who are your scum reads?
i've softened a bit on Texcat.
{KainTepes, Texcat, Masquerade, Persivul} would be the list i'm working off atm
In post 384, Alexcellent wrote:Maxous - has your tex read changed at all? Who are your scum reads?
In post 391, Alexcellent wrote:Like this, if he's scum and he's already being called out for not explaining his votes, why does he keep doing it so blatantly?
In post 382, Alexcellent wrote:Persivul - At most, I'd say he's playing anti-town, but I don't see a lot of scum motivation in his posting.
In post 402, Persivul wrote:In post 382, Alexcellent wrote:Persivul - At most, I'd say he's playing anti-town, but I don't see a lot of scum motivation in his posting.
Wowsers, someone actually considering motivation rather than just playing by the numbers.
In post 403, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Please explain to me how you can be anti town but not mafia in a 2 faction game? Also what do you mean by the numbers? Are you say we should randomly guess all the time and ignore logic, reason, and statistics?
In post 407, Persivul wrote:Stop being bad gurts.
In post 407, Persivul wrote:Stop being bad gurts.
In post 409, wgeurts wrote:Let's see I'm asking someone to provide content if they're town hence giving them a chance to explain where they stand and what they see and they're calling me bad. Right.
In post 397, BlacleWorks wrote:In post 386, BlacleWorks wrote:Are there any cases that look solid to you alexcellent? Consider that this is D1...
Bwahaha. Wgeurts, You seem to think I am playing under the same conditions as you.I don't care what town thinks about my actions.Isn't that um... what scum cares about?
I am almost positive you will be in lylo uncleared and in a 1v1 with some cleared town picking between you and scum.
In post 398, BlacleWorks wrote:This might need to be said.
Dear cop you can only trust your inno results on players you are currently null reading.
In post 410, Persivul wrote:In post 409, wgeurts wrote:Let's see I'm asking someone to provide content if they're town hence giving them a chance to explain where they stand and what they see and they're calling me bad. Right.
You tunneled a townie until he claimed a PR. Now you're tunneling again. You haven't learned your lesson. Stop being bad.
People should stop trying to act townie intentionally as town, due to that a meta can form with "how town should act" which scum players of a certain level can easily replicate as their scum-game. People should just play as they do naturally. That way people are forced to look genuine as scum which is harder and not just meet a set of standards.
In post 417, Persivul wrote:Just ran across this from gurts in the discussion forum:
People should stop trying to act townie intentionally as town, due to that a meta can form with "how town should act" which scum players of a certain level can easily replicate as their scum-game. People should just play as they do naturally. That way people are forced to look genuine as scum which is harder and not just meet a set of standards.
Why aren't you following your own advice? You expect people to do certain things you consider townie even if they don't feel like doing it naturally.
VOTE: wgeurts
In post 419, wgeurts wrote:Like if you're really town and you're refusing to interact and work with others you're playing awfully.
In post 422, BlacleWorks wrote:Why is everyone playing rediculously shit tier mafia?
Using meta to establish reads? I make a point to play differently in every game just to prove that meta is actually the worse way to attempt to read someone. I think some of you forgot that this game is purely psychological.
Lynch Wgeurts.