RadiantCowbells wrote:I'll actually read this.
I'll give you the highlights.
- On D1, SnarkySnowman was a scummy scumperson, was wagoned, and claimed N1 cop. This is how KTS got mislynched.
- D2, SnarkySnowman claimed a guilty on your slot, pisskop.
- Hilariously enough, as you're well aware, pisskop was an N1 cop with an innocent on Kop. The results from this were obvious.
- shotty managed to obvscum it up D3. We gained the additional information that Kop was an N2 cop, with an innocent on Almost50.
- Rhaegar has been obvtowning it up ever since D1.
- shotty claimed N4 cop, we lynched him anyway.
- D4 comes around. duppin and Autti both push for a massclaim.
- I deduced Rhaegar was a doctor. From SnarkySnowman and shotty both claiming cop, I inferred we were in the 6:4 doc:cop setup.
- This is because I, myself, am a doctor, for N5.
- It was concluded scum was within {duppin, Autti}, and we lynched duppin. It wasn't him.
So that's where we're at right now.
You're basically confirmed town. Rhaegar is basically confirmed town. I'm not
as
confirmed town, though I can argue for it if necessary. Kop
is
literally confirmed town. So, Autti is pretty much the last scum.
So, let's list the theoretical options we can do for today.
- The lynch could be on one of {you, Rhaegar}. GOD no, for the aforementioned reasons that while you may not officially be literally-mod-confirmed town, I'm treating you both as if you are anyway.
- We mislynch me. This will bring you to an {Autti, RadiantCowbells, Rhaegar} lylo. For obvious reasons, I'd
prefer
you not doing this, but so long as you lynch Autti, then I wouldn't mind too terribly much. If I'm wrong, I'll take the blame, but, really, I'm not. - We lynch Autti. This should win us the game. If it doesn't, then this scenario is effectively identical to the above, since I'd deserve the loss.
- Option four is viable because of claims and math: we no lynch. I'm an N5 doctor. Autti is a claimed N5 cop. If the scum no-kill or I stop a kill, then tomorrow, we have Autti either claiming a guilty (which is an auto-win: lynch the guilty, and if Autti was lying, lynch Autti), or Autti claiming an innocent result: lynch Autti to either end the game or confirm the innocent, scum nightkill one of the two innocent results, and we go into a 3p lylo with one conftown, a 50/50 shot.
That's the best-case scenario, but it still works mathematically if scum nightkill someone. They can't hit conftown because I'd be protecting Kop. Meaning they'd have to nightkill an unconfirmed player. If they nightkill an unconfirmed player within the three Rs {Ranger, Rhaegar, Radiant}, then Autti will claim a result. If Autti claims a result on a living player, regardless of innocent or guilty, we have a 50/50: choosing between Autti and one other player.
The down side to this scenario, however, is two outcomes: if Autti claims to investigate the R player nightkilled, then we have Autti and two uncleared players, objectively a 33% chance. I'd say this is the worst-case scenario. The second is if Autti is town, and is nightkilled. Because that would leave all three Rs alive, and uncleared. Also objectively a 33% chance. This scenario, however, is basically identical to as if we had lynched Autti. I also find it the least-likely, because, well...it requires Autti being town.
Personally, I prefer scenario 3 because it's probably the fastest way to win the game. But I want your feedback.