In post 1565, Firebringer wrote:Probably going to lynch EAP, to be honest.
Because?
In post 1575, Apricity wrote:In post 1565, Firebringer wrote:Probably going to lynch EAP, to be honest.
Because?
In post 1582, Persivul wrote:There was no kill last night. A commuter or some other role apparently worked. Can someone explain to me why we're going to give scum a roadmap to safe NKs? I was thinking hiplop was scummy before reading today's content - this far into the game with no scum lynches and he's still alive, considering his caliber as a player him being scum is the only thing that reconciles those. But, I agree with him on the massclaim...
In post 1581, zakk wrote:Anybody think hiplop and EAP are both scum or both town?
In post 1581, zakk wrote:Anybody think hiplop and EAP are both scum or both town?
In post 1585, Specter Deflectors wrote:In post 1581, zakk wrote:Anybody think hiplop and EAP are both scum or both town?
What? EAP has a guilty on hiplop. One of them HAS to be scum. Possibly both are scum but I really doubt it.
- Max
In post 1525, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:MOD: Is the votecount correct in reflecting that Firebringer now occupies two slots?
"If you ever start taking things too seriously, just remember that we are talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe."
-Joe Rogan
In post 1583, zakk wrote:Ok not mass-claiming is also fine but what is your position on EAP v Hiplop, Persivul?