Mini 1785: Game Over!

MURDERCAT · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:24 am

Sure Garmr.

Any reasoning behind that vote Jake?

nnn_thekushmountains · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:25 am

In post 773, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 756, Fire Assassin wrote:
In post 729, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 726, MURDERCAT wrote:Anyways, we aren't lynching you today I don't think so I guess I'll have to move my vote sooner or later.

Don't see why U'd think garmr can't be lynched today.

There is no way Garmr is getting lynched today. One of me or Garmr have to be night killed before that happens.

Challenge accepted

vote: garmr

but you haven't even communicated why you want to lynch garmr.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:33 am

In post 774, Garmr wrote:And when I flip town will you pubically appoligize and lynch lapsa?

Why Lapsa and not the person who you're voting for?

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:33 am

In post 775, MURDERCAT wrote:Sure Garmr.

Any reasoning behind that vote Jake?

I think he could be scum

MURDERCAT · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:36 am

Solid.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:39 am

In post 776, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
In post 773, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 756, Fire Assassin wrote:
In post 729, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 726, MURDERCAT wrote:Anyways, we aren't lynching you today I don't think so I guess I'll have to move my vote sooner or later.

Don't see why U'd think garmr can't be lynched today.

There is no way Garmr is getting lynched today. One of me or Garmr have to be night killed before that happens.

Challenge accepted

vote: garmr

but you haven't even communicated why you want to lynch garmr.

Fun fact. There's no rule in place that actually requires me to do so

Heat · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:45 am

In post 765, Jake from State Farm wrote:
mod 3 people are voting garmr, not 2

fixed.

nnn_thekushmountains · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:51 am

@jake didn't you criticize Wisdom for doing the same thing last game?

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:53 am

For not giving a reason when he voted? No

For not giving a reason when asked multiple times? Yes

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:54 am

If you actually knew anything about me you know I'm notorious for voting without reasons

nnn_thekushmountains · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:00 am

well you've been asked multiple times lol.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:03 am

By who? Only one person asked me why I'm voting garmr and I have him an answer.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:04 am

*gave

Mr Meeseeks · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:10 am

In post 711, JarJarDrinks wrote:If I voted for you when you were voting for me, u would have called me scummy for OMGUSing.

But go ahead, please tell me how waiting for you to unvote before casting my vote for you is beneficial to me as scum.

im fairly sure you just answered your own question here before even asking it

In post 720, Fire Assassin wrote:Garmr, want to switch this up to JarJar?
VOTE: JarJarDrinks
Not down for a Calvary lynch today, maybe tomorrow.

fb knows where its attttt

In post 724, Garmr wrote:
In post 720, Fire Assassin wrote:Garmr, want to switch this up to JarJar?
VOTE: JarJarDrinks
Not down for a Calvary lynch today, maybe tomorrow.

VOTE: jarjar

<3

In post 735, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 731, Garmr wrote:I'm town reading both tbh but I don't think Jake will accept because I think kush is town.

Your correct. My opinion > anyone else's.

I haven't seen a single compelling argument for anyone yet. Take you for example. You made a case on somebody but want me to vote somebody else. Why?

Right now I'm lost and the only person who has been blatantly scummy is Kush.

im not really a case-making kinda guy, but have a read through my iso (dont try ctrl+f-ing jarjar because ive referred to him in many ways), and youll probably catch the general gist as to why i think hes scummy

In post 756, Fire Assassin wrote:
In post 729, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 726, MURDERCAT wrote:Anyways, we aren't lynching you today I don't think so I guess I'll have to move my vote sooner or later.

Don't see why U'd think garmr can't be lynched today.

There is no way Garmr is getting lynched today. One of me or Garmr have to be night killed before that happens.

yeah, no way in hell im voting garmr either as the game stands now, for the record. hed have to do something insanely scummy today to surpass my reads

In post 771, JarJarDrinks wrote:If anyone voting for me (or not voting for me) has questions or any points to make, please do so.

I don't think anyone has given any reason for me being scum aside from townreading Lapsa.

eh, i think ive expanded on it being a bit more than that. thats the big thing, sure, but theres various other things. plus its less that youre townreading lapsa, more that i cant see any reasons other than "scummy as town" (which doesnt immediately make them town in any sense) and "scum are voting him" (which is starting to seem bizarrely circular considering youve only scumread those people to an extent because theyre voting lapsa, and is never a reason to townread anyone regardless).

In post 784, Jake from State Farm wrote:If you actually knew anything about me you know I'm notorious for voting without reasons

jake, why are you voting garmr?

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:37 am

In post 788, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
In post 711, JarJarDrinks wrote:If I voted for you when you were voting for me, u would have called me scummy for OMGUSing.

But go ahead, please tell me how waiting for you to unvote before casting my vote for you is beneficial to me as scum.
im fairly sure you just answered your own question here before even asking it

Um, I guess you're implying that I waited because I didn't want to look scummy and that makes me scummy?

Please explain to me in what manner I should have voted garmr for you to not think it was scummy? Sound to me like it wouldn't matter if I waited or not.

In post 788, Mr Meeseeks wrote:theres various other things.

cool, what are they? I'd like to be able to respond to something.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 5:45 am

In post 788, Mr Meeseeks wrote:jake, why are you voting garmr?

Well I already answered this

nnn_thekushmountains · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:03 am

jake, your answer was "because i think he could be scum" but people are looking for you to say WHY you think he could be scum. Obviously.

Anyway I could join a Jake wagon. Partially on policy of uncommunicativeness. Partially because he could be scum.

Mr Meeseeks · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:05 am

In post 789, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 788, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
In post 711, JarJarDrinks wrote:If I voted for you when you were voting for me, u would have called me scummy for OMGUSing.

But go ahead, please tell me how waiting for you to unvote before casting my vote for you is beneficial to me as scum.
im fairly sure you just answered your own question here before even asking it
Um, I guess you're implying that I waited because I didn't want to look scummy and that makes me scummy?

Please explain to me in what manner I should have voted garmr for you to not think it was scummy? Sound to me like it wouldn't matter if I waited or not.
im not saying i agree with that reason, im just saying it seems kinda redundant to answer a question that you had basically answered yourself

In post 788, Mr Meeseeks wrote:theres various other things.
cool, what are they? I'd like to be able to respond to something.
read my iso! im fairly sure theres more against you than just stuff to do with you voting lapsa, although it might be buried a bit because my posts are very much "stream of thoughts strung together"

In post 790, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 788, Mr Meeseeks wrote:jake, why are you voting garmr?

Well I already answered this

you mean "because he's scum"? you know what i mean, an actual reason. i know you have it in you. stop fucking around.

Mr Meeseeks · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:06 am

In post 791, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:jake, your answer was "because i think he could be scum" but people are looking for you to say WHY you think he could be scum. Obviously.

Anyway I could join a Jake wagon. Partially on policy of uncommunicativeness. Partially because he could be scum.

in all honesty i think jake is just like this as town, we just need to get a few more people asking him why hes voting garmr more precisely

MURDERCAT · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:08 am

Jake wagon is stupid. I imagine he is withholding an answer for a reason, I don't see why a big push to understand why is necessary right now.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:09 am

Well if you want to know WHY I think he's scum all you had to do was ask.

WHY I think he is scum is because his actions don't make much sense from a townie pov. He makes a case on somebody but gives up on pushing them because of what I can only assume is lack of support. He instead wants to vote people he hasn't made a case for. He said he made one but when called to link it he retracted his statement. he tried to get me to vote somebody and when I asked him why I should, he replied with "because he's scum" again no case or even valid reasons.

So I think he's scum because town imo doesn't do those things

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:10 am

In post 794, MURDERCAT wrote:Jake wagon is stupid. I imagine he is withholding an answer for a reason, I don't see why a big push to understand why is necessary right now.

There isn't even a wagon. I don't even think I have a single vote on me which actually surprises me based on how I've played so far. I totally expected to have some votes by now

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:11 am

In post 791, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Partially on policy of uncommunicativeness.

I'm communicating just fine thanks. People need to word their questions better Ldo

MURDERCAT · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:16 am

I meant Kush's suggestion was stupid.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:30 am

Well yes but he's probably scum and is threatened by me