In post 41, Jake from State Farm wrote:I never said there was scum motivation for fake claiming. I am not calling him scum or even think he is scum atm. he is null to me
He has to be town or scum though and you said town has no reason to claim on page 1.
yes he is either going to be town or scum. congratulations on narrowing things down for me...
in my opinion town has no reason to claim on page 1, but that doesn't mean it's not possible that he is town and actually claimed on page 1.
In post 51, Jake from State Farm wrote:well the thing was I already said I didn't find scum motivation and you went and asked me again. if you are town please keep up and pay attention.
this was directed at cakes
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
In post 25, drmyshottyizsik wrote:WTF I'm L-1 by post 21? Somethings not right here. I can promise you all that I win with town.
Whats not right here then?
I have figured that out yet, or else something would have been replaced with something other than something.
Then why would you lash out by saying "WTF I promise i win with town!" if we probably weren't going to hammer you?
I don't think I lashed out. I think I just promised that I won with town. Do you NOT promise that you win with the town? Is winning with town a bad thing for you?
In post 25, drmyshottyizsik wrote:WTF I'm L-1 by post 21? Somethings not right here. I can promise you all that I win with town.
Whats not right here then?
I have figured that out yet, or else something would have been replaced with something other than something.
Then why would you lash out by saying "WTF I promise i win with town!" if we probably weren't going to hammer you?
I don't think I lashed out. I think I just promised that I won with town. Do you NOT promise that you win with the town? Is winning with town a bad thing for you?
Its not that you said you won with town, its the "WTF" that striked me as lashing out, since by playing on this site and seeing RVS happen early game i'd expect you to be atleast familiar with how the concept of how you can pressure someone for alignment tells at L-1, since they can look nervous afterwards. Atleast, I just don't like how people do the whole "NO wait i promise i win with town!" because in all honesty that line doesn't help, nada.
In post 25, drmyshottyizsik wrote:WTF I'm L-1 by post 21? Somethings not right here. I can promise you all that I win with town.
Whats not right here then?
I have figured that out yet, or else something would have been replaced with something other than something.
Then why would you lash out by saying "WTF I promise i win with town!" if we probably weren't going to hammer you?
I don't think I lashed out. I think I just promised that I won with town. Do you NOT promise that you win with the town? Is winning with town a bad thing for you?
Its not that you said you won with town, its the "WTF" that striked me as lashing out, since by playing on this site and seeing RVS happen early game i'd expect you to be atleast familiar with how the concept of how you can pressure someone for alignment tells at L-1, since they can look nervous afterwards. Atleast, I just don't like how people do the whole "NO wait i promise i win with town!" because in all honesty that line doesn't help, nada.
The I promise I win with town wasn't in response to the L-1, but rather being called a traitor.
In post 66, drmyshottyizsik wrote:The I promise I win with town wasn't in response to the L-1, but rather being called a traitor.
Alright, that makes some sense. shotty is starting to look townie, so i'm going to move my vote to jake, since I agree with what's being said about him
In post 66, drmyshottyizsik wrote:The I promise I win with town wasn't in response to the L-1, but rather being called a traitor.
Alright, that makes some sense. shotty is starting to look townie, so i'm going to move my vote to jake, since I agree with what's being said about him
VOTE: Jake from statefarm
What's been said about me exactly?
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
Ok, I have a few moments on my break at work to catch up and post my thoughts. I believe the beeboy claim because it is easily proven and this has no reason to lie, although this doesn't mean he is town as scum could have that role as well. I don't like the way jfsf was attacking this claim so vigorously, it seems like he is trying to push a point that doesn't matter. That said, I find shotty the most suspicious at the moment for a couple of reasons. His "wtf" post and more importantly the redundant vote that when questioned about, he simply replied with a smartass comeback.
VOTE: shotty
Also, I find it odd that beeboy unvoted before the votecount and now we have to wait to prove his claim.
In post 34, Jake from State Farm wrote:I had every reason to believe you are fake claiming because townies don't claim their role on page 1
I never said their was scum intent in fake claiming.
I disagree there is town incentive in legit claiming
Robbed of a scummy for what had to be the best unvote in mafiascum history.
Sometimes I get heated and don’t realize it. If I get like this please somebody tell me to take a break and chill out. Thanks in advance.
