In post 1759, Postie wrote:
Okay but was it or was it not a "verification of an unclaim" and if not, what were you saying?
What part of "I don't care" confuses you.
I've answered this question - all I would do now is repeat my answers to you.
I have no further interest in doing so - proceed with your case as you see fit, if you need Mafia education join a Newbie with me as an IC when I'm encouraged to deal with this sort of stuff. You're either town who doesn't get it, and won't get it till after the game is over, or you're scum who doesn't get it it (or is faking not getting it) none of those possibilities suggest me explaining it in smaller words will help - so, no.
In post 1761, SirCakez wrote:
Someone said they were townreading Titus's crumbs, I don't remember if it was you or someone else
It was me.
In post 1763, Ranger wrote:Expedience wrote:Are you claiming cop or something, you seem awfully sure?
This is not something I should answer.
Oh man, now Titus and Postie will scum read you!
Brilliant scumhunting, Expedience!
In post 1771, Titus wrote:
Ranger, stop being a dumb Smurf.
You've already told scum you're one of two roles based on your challenge to me and they know I'm town.
Oh...no...wait, apparently this is utterly different than confirming something about your role when asked.
In other words, I'd oppose Ranger, Cakez, and SMGO wagons. I'm fine with all others at this stage. I actively endorse a Titus wagon. I could probably do an Expedience or 3dice wagon out of boredom, and those are my next two biggest drives, so... meh.