In post 33, kuribo wrote:Katsuki: You have two cows which you might see about once a month.
In post 163, RedCoyote wrote:In post 153, LlamaFluff wrote:In post 148, Ranmaru wrote:Hmm, Llama. What do you think entails good town play? Interested in your opinion.
Core three that are universal for town and scum are
1) Be likeable
2) Be active
3) Be logical
If you just follow those three you gain a lot of power in most games. I can talk about more later but those are paramount.
Heh, I'm getting off on thinking of players that have 2 of 3. It's kind of fun.
1 + 2 (no 3) = Katsuki
1 + 3 (no 2) = Quilford, Seraphim
2 + 3 (no 1) = MoI, IS (although I like him dearly)
I say it with love. I say it with love. <3
In post 1199, Davsto wrote:It's a roundabout way of me saying "Not only is it scummy, but you lurking and having little content to your posts, and then accusing someone else of lurking and when they call you out on it you replying by saying you'retalking about content relevant to postsis hilarious and hypocritical too!"
In post 1200, Katsuki wrote:there's not much value in it coming out of my mouth.
Katsuki is a top tier player, as is Faraday. He and Faraday are nigh unreadable in different ways. One seemingly puts forth little to no effort into games and survives as few deem him a threat, while the other is fairly devious and clever, but attracts too much unnecessary attention to himself, shortening his lifespan. Both are very talented players, with very different approaches. This thread has helped shed light to quality players on the site.
Regardless of what you say, Katsuki deserved a scummy and is a player worth looking up to. His playing style may not appear to be the greatest in your eyes, but it is efficient. Even if he possesses a remarkably low intelligence (doubtful), his playing style and strategy is peerless.
In post 95, mith wrote:
Katsuki:I'm getting fed up with "Policy lynch Katsuki on day one because it'll always work out" every game. Flay, you can--
He is cut off by a loud CRASH.
???:KATSUKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII YOU CHEEKY SCUMF[removed]
In post 1204, Quilford wrote:woah I'd never seen that lovely compliment from RC!
In post 689, Katsuki wrote:UncertainKitten wrote:Jesus Christ Kats, why can't you be that awesome in games I play with you? I have a newfound respect for your play because I've literally never seen this side of you in games we play together.
Because we're never on the same side~
Plus I have a reputation to uphold. = =b
In post 694, Katsuki wrote:UncertainKitten wrote:Hrm, you might be right. WE NEED TO BE TOWN TOGETHER AGAIN SO I CAN SEE THE AWESOME KATS!
I understand a lot better why LLD says you're a good player now, so I'm glad of that.
Watch me be completely wrong next time we play together. XD
Nooooo though seriously I'm actually pretty bad.
Cupcakes can't play mafia.
In post 695, UncertainKitten wrote:It's less whether your right or wrong so much as how much effort and analysis you put in. I never get to see it. It always feels like you're lurking or sheeping and I always want to think you're scum for that or ignore you.
In post 1211, Bins wrote:do you townread all the people who have been bickering this entire game?
In post 1157, Gorkington wrote:why is it about time we lynch someone?
are you feeling impatient about a game with one cycle? :/
In post 1163, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Snnnnore. Lurker lynches are barely a way to win a game even if you're right
In post 1208, Bins wrote:tbf tho kats your scum game is scary too and this type of play is easily mimicked
In post 1218, Antihero wrote:bins and bulge are really creeping me out
In post 1218, Antihero wrote:bins and bulge are really creeping me out
In post 1219, Katsuki wrote:In post 1208, Bins wrote:tbf tho kats your scum game is scary too and this type of play is easily mimicked
said everyone about my towngame ever