In post 343, Postie wrote: In post 342, acryon wrote:
93: Faux-content. Everyone obviously already agreed on Severa's play, so no point in overexplaining about it the way he did. Then he asks Ari a fluff question, which he knew would likely give a fluff answer considering how he later responded to a similar question from Postie.
Why is fluff alignment indicative?
Isolated incidents are not. But the fact remains it is faux-content.
In post 343, Postie wrote: In post 342, acryon wrote:235 finds us an indictment for focusing on Severa but not really doing anything else, and this basically describes dupppin's play up to that point.
Why is hypocrisy alignment indicative?
Because he evidently thinks that kind of play
is
scum-indicative, but if he is town, then it's clearly not.
In post 343, Postie wrote: In post 342, acryon wrote:240: Seems weird to base your reads on a single slot's alignment especially when you
don't know that spots alignment
.
Why is something being "weird" alignment indicative?
"Weird" is more something that pings than something which is clearly scum or town. When I put the pieces together, it makes the weird things look a little worse.
p.edit: Re: BlueYoshi scumread. My list was simply a rank from Towniest to Scummiest. Being toward the bottom doesn't mean I think someone is really scum, but rather I think they are scummier than the people above them currently. But some of Blue Yoshi's content just feels like trying to be active and look town more-so than others. I outlined a couple issues I have with BY's reads in
319. But again this is not me saying I particularly think he is scum, but he is on my watchlist.