kuribo in Wonderland - [Game Over]

[Antihero]

i dont think ill of you because you're not explaining

i think ill of you because you act like you're above even trying

[G[o]dz]

What do you think I haven't tried to do?

[Antihero]

anything useful

[G[o]dz]

Be more specific.

[Antihero]

no

YOU be more specific.

b/c the only thing you've done is shitpost. the conversation's pretty much gone like this.

you: i think anti and kat are scum.
nacho: why?
you: i think anti and kat are scum.
spiffeh: i think anti's town.
you: i disagree.

at least if you linked posts and at least made a good faith attempt to articulate why people could say "i agree/disagree with that assessment" (kind of like how you did for kat in dredging up the one post, but even then you left a good chunk of guesswork up to nacho). but you refuse to even do that, and instead substitute spamming. i'm guessing b/c you think it's a form of "sharing an opinion" or looking authoritative or contributing, but i'll leave that up to the armchair psychologists. all i know is that it's irritating and it's not advancing the game.

[G[o]dz]

I explained why I thought Kastuko was scum - I just didn't provide a plethora of examples.

I didn't explain why I thought you were scum because you literally have no game-related content. You haven't given any reads and you haven't been scum hunting at all. What are you expecting? Me to quote non-existent posts and say "because of these non-existent posts, I have come to the conclusion that because they don't exist, Antihero is a scum"?

[Antihero]

i gave a read so that's like...

not true?

[Antihero]

yeah ok now i just have a flat-out scumread on godz

[G[o]dz]

What? Your extremely non-committal "mkay spiffeh's scum" because he said he had two town reads? That was serious?

I find it ironic that you call my posts "shitposting" if that's the level of play I can expect from you.

[G[o]dz]

yeah ok now i just have a flat-out scumread on godz

Is this the part where I ask you to elaborate and you either (a) give an incredibly awful explanation and pretend it's not awful, or (b) pretend that you're not giving an explanation because I don't explain things either?

[Antihero]

is that your final answer?

[FakeGod]

VoteCount 1.3

Katsuki [9] - Katsuki, G[o]dz, hiplop, Albert B. Rampage, Kagami, camn, implosion, Brian Skies, zakk
implosion [1] - KittyMo
camn [1] - Spiffeh
Spiffeh [1] - Skybird
Fate [5] - Fate, BROseidon, SirCakez, Antihero, kuribo

Not Voting [4]

- DrippingGoofball, atm487, Axelrod, Nachomamma8

With 21 alive it takes 11 votes to become King

.

Countdown to deadline: (expired on 2016-05-28 15:00:00)

[G[o]dz]

Kastuki, I have a single request:

If you become King, please strongly consider making Antihero dead. For me. Thanks. I don't care if you're a scum. Just do it and I'll vote you every day I'm alive.

[Antihero]

yeah, shoot either godz or me because i'm through w/ being in the same game as him

[G[o]dz]

Grant his wish, Kastuko.

[Antihero]

don't sign up for another game w/ me

i'll return the favor

[G[o]dz]

i gave a read so that's like...

not true?

I also like that your defense to no scum hunting and no reads is "I gave

a read

so that's not true"

Like, literally, your whole rebuttal was "I gave a read" (a read which happened AFTER I mentioned my read on you, by the way, so the timeline of events is still in my favour).

[Antihero]

oh is that so?

I'm sorry, but I won't be dancing for you tonight.

you are so boring

it's zakk

dz post_id=7934607 time=1463806923 user_id=15399 post_num=268]Antihero is maybe a scum.

tell me, does 267 come BEFORE or AFTER 268?

[G[o]dz]

"I have a could shots in mind" "Guess who" "It's zakk"

Yeah, I suppose if you squint, that could be interpreted as a scum read. My bad. You've given a read. Two if we count spiffeh. Now three if we count me. Zero town reads and zero explanations (wait, isn't it unhelpful to do that?) and, more to the point, zero scum hunting effort. If I'm being really, really, really generous, "does he always act like this?" is maybe scum hunting? Not really, though. So still, no.

You go off about how I'm not being helpful and shit. Where's your fucking explanations? You've been asked and refused to elaborate. Why are you "spamming" and "shitposting"?

[Antihero]

[G[o]dz]

Oh, actually, you did ask KittyMo why he thinks Skybird is a scum. Technically that could be construed as scum hunting, too. I guess it's not fair to say zero.

I think it's best to rephrase: the amount of scum hunting and the reads you've given is so pitiful in comparison to the amount of posts you've made that have nothing to do with finding scum that I think it's more likely you're not fighting for justice than not.

[G[o]dz]

And, still, no explanation for the "reads" you've given, after a full-blown criticism about how that sort of "spam" doesn't move the game forward.

*clap* *clap*

You're really sticking it to me by doing what you think is not-good-for-the-game just to make a point about your opinion on me.

You sure are a good player.

[Antihero]

if you read my comments about zakk, you could probably glean from context that it's a meta-based read since i mentioned a previous game and mentioned that he put different levels of effort into being charismatic in both these games. i also have a couple reads in my back pocket that i'm holding off on even introducing to the threat yet (precisely because i can't articulate them and dont know if they're shit or not; this is why i said i have a "couple" ideas for shots).

if you asked me to elaborate on my zakk read, i could site specific posts (like Post 76 and Post 238) that pinged me. i wouldn't just say "welp, i just think he's scum." and i haven't done that.

[Antihero]

to keep the thread from getting toxic i'll just disengage i guess...?

you can have the last word

[G[o]dz]

Other than the fact that I'm more interested in your read on me (since it's the only read you've explicitly stated as a full-on scum read), how exactly is one supposed to glean that it's a meta-based read when you literally ask if he's always like that? Doesn't it defeat the purpose of a "meta-based" read if you don't even know what you're talking about?