Kinda interesting that you and Aristo have such different takes on my alignment when you both had the same idea.In post 580, I Am Innocent wrote: Long story short, whether I too went all in, you did the exact same thing I "at minimum" considered....all in on strongman and claiming early. I don't see you as scum because of that. That was my main point.
Oh noez, I'm so scared. Let me change my vote real quick to appease you!In post 601, Aristophanes wrote:Lol
"Have"
Like the present tense?
Despite my recent change in read?
I'll change it back if you keep this shit up.
It's gotten old and tunnely.
What I mean is that I developed a townread over time, and you are quickly wearing it thin.In post 602, House wrote:Oh noez, I'm so scared. Let me change my vote real quick to appease you!In post 601, Aristophanes wrote:Lol
"Have"
Like the present tense?
Despite my recent change in read?
I'll change it back if you keep this shit up.
It's gotten old and tunnely.
Yeah, scum likes to bit back like that. Especially when their attempt to placate fails.In post 603, Aristophanes wrote:What I mean is that I developed a townread over time, and you are quickly wearing it thin.In post 602, House wrote:Oh noez, I'm so scared. Let me change my vote real quick to appease you!In post 601, Aristophanes wrote:Lol
"Have"
Like the present tense?
Despite my recent change in read?
I'll change it back if you keep this shit up.
It's gotten old and tunnely.
I am worried you are caught in a deathtunnel on town, that's why! But whatever. I'll just not talk to you then.In post 606, House wrote:There's 17 other players in the game besides me, and it's not like half of them are voting you so I don't see why you're so worried about my read of you.
VOTE: UnexpectedAnvilIn post 261, House wrote:Personally, I think this post is a crock.In post 234, UnexpectedAnvil wrote:So I did the same thing as House, but spent them all on ninja. Spent all of my points on town Ninja. I haven't finished reading the thread yet, but I thought I would share this.
1) There's no practical reason for giving up multiple shots at PR's in favor of stopping scum from being tracked one night.
The reason strongman is different is because it can overrule active protection on a target. It's worth keeping out of scum hands. If I hadn't used my points on strongman, they'd have likely gone into double roleblocker for the same reason, and I'd have been far more likely to believe the claim if it had been that over ninja.
2) It's easy to "me too" for town points when you see somebody else do something risky and get cred for it.
I Am Innocent wrote:The underlines were not the case, go back and look at my posts.In post 279, hebichan wrote:The weird part is how I am Innocent claimed to have the ideaIn post 272, zMuffinMan wrote:why is that so hard to believe? securing roles or preventing scum getting them isn't exactly an idea only a rocket surgeon could come up with
i don't think ninja (or strongman, really) is so valuable that it requires this but i don't see it as odd that two people would do this and i don't see it as odd that they chose different rolesbut not have taken itright after the original claim.
I don't think the ninja and/or strongman all ins here are particularly alignment indicative for now.
Cause on the one hand, it's entirely possible they both did just happen to all in on the pro mafia roles.
On the other, the mafia could have coordinated to all in on the rolls and not cross over each other.
I'd say it's a pretty null claim, strong in neither direction.
@house
You would have to be the only one who all inned on strongman if you got the role, otherwise neither person would get the action.
I am Innocent claimed to have thought of it,but decided against it. Even if we assume it's true, there's no real point in saying this unless you wanted to look more town without actually contributing.
It doesn't actually claim, it doesn't stop the auction cop from looking at your results and thinking they're funky.
It's not really anti-town either, as it doesn't give mafia useful information. But it certainly seems weird.
Yes. You did say that you decided against it later. "I considered doing the same" "but worried"In post 103, I Am Innocent wrote:Is this serious? I considered doing the same thing (and announcing it post 1) but worried that multiple town might do this and waste a lot of cumulative town points.In post 13, House wrote:You guys can thank me for scum being deprived of strongman.
I spent all my points bidding on the role even though I'm town just to keep it out of scum hands.
I now see why imp didn't want strategy talk in the sign up forum.
I think knowing this information for fact will change night strategies. Maybe even day strategies.
^ bad post is badIn post 609, hebichan wrote:I Am Innocent wrote:The underlines were not the case, go back and look at my posts.In post 279, hebichan wrote:The weird part is how I am Innocent claimed to have the ideaIn post 272, zMuffinMan wrote:why is that so hard to believe? securing roles or preventing scum getting them isn't exactly an idea only a rocket surgeon could come up with
i don't think ninja (or strongman, really) is so valuable that it requires this but i don't see it as odd that two people would do this and i don't see it as odd that they chose different rolesbut not have taken itright after the original claim.
I don't think the ninja and/or strongman all ins here are particularly alignment indicative for now.
Cause on the one hand, it's entirely possible they both did just happen to all in on the pro mafia roles.
On the other, the mafia could have coordinated to all in on the rolls and not cross over each other.
I'd say it's a pretty null claim, strong in neither direction.
@house
You would have to be the only one who all inned on strongman if you got the role, otherwise neither person would get the action.
I am Innocent claimed to have thought of it,but decided against it. Even if we assume it's true, there's no real point in saying this unless you wanted to look more town without actually contributing.
It doesn't actually claim, it doesn't stop the auction cop from looking at your results and thinking they're funky.
It's not really anti-town either, as it doesn't give mafia useful information. But it certainly seems weird.Yes. You did say that you decided against it later. "I considered doing the same" "but worried"In post 103, I Am Innocent wrote:Is this serious? I considered doing the same thing (and announcing it post 1) but worried that multiple town might do this and waste a lot of cumulative town points.In post 13, House wrote:You guys can thank me for scum being deprived of strongman.
I spent all my points bidding on the role even though I'm town just to keep it out of scum hands.
I now see why imp didn't want strategy talk in the sign up forum.
I think knowing this information for fact will change night strategies. Maybe even day strategies.
I feel like voting you again.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: I am Innocent
You not only lied, you're also being way too dodgy on whether you are the other strongman bidder. I don't like it.
Ohey, we agree on something!In post 610, House wrote:^ bad post is bad
myriad*In post 448, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:How about you shut your whore mouth and let me do work?
I'll fucking tell you why I want that mirriad of questions answered once light actually answers them.
So you're fine with your vote looking scummy as shit until you can think something up?
