$9 in the bank. This will make Kappy closer to Ircher.
Spoiler: I wonder what is the result
Kappy played
secure
Ircher played
secure
Nope
You have 48 hours to pm the 12th move.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Uh oh...Here we go again. If all turns steal, you will have another Star Trek meme.
Spoiler: I wonder what is the result
Kappy played
steal
Ircher played
steal
Felissan played
steal
Snakes played
secure
Snakes made a quantum leap, but Felissan is holding to dear live.
It all
may
come down to this. Who will win? Ircher? Snakes? Felissan? Kappy? or The Bank...again?
You have 48 hours to pm the 13th move.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Ircher is taking V/LA. We are losing altitude now.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Last edited by Realeo on Sat Jun 04, 2016 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Next game result will have an intentional mistake. Try if you can spot it.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Felissan is bankrupt and per se of the rule, she is not required to pay.
Game is Ovah, seriously. The returning victor is victorious--again.
You have 48 hours to pm the 14th move.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
I clarified the rule and it turned out that the game designer created the rule to prevent kingmaker. For example:
A and B has $11 and C has $1.
If both A and B played Secure and C played steal, C can decide who will win without "bankrupt no need to pay" rule. C can play A for $1 and nothing for B or C can pay B for $1 and nothing for A.
Originally, I oppose but the designer argued that he want to create it "as simple as possible".
Not sure if this is a bug or a feature. I will say bug for simple scenario and feature for complex scenario.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
It seems like it would be more to player expectation to have the securing players put stealing players into negative digits, although maybe that doesn't make sense with the physical game?
You mean like that to have player with negative account, you need to create extra money token to account for negative score?
Perhaps? But I would like to bet on no in my friend's case. I mean, in monopoly, if you're bankrupt, you just hand out the money. The problem is, if bankruptcy in monopoly is simply bilateral, bankruptcy in this game is sometimes multilateral and perhaps my friend found it too complex to write as a rule?
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
consider splitting the money but it may lands on uncharted territory of the game.
In Monopoly when you bankrupt you do pay whoever you land on all you have.
True, but you went bankrupt against 1 person so paying is binary. In this game, it can be against multiple people. Splitting $425 is not really that easy..
I will consult with the game designer.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
I will take a week hiatus before playing again. I need a break.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Ah. It's a week already. Preparing stable internet connection and we're on.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
Each thief deposits $1 to the bank, hoping that other will deposit more so they can win more when they break the bank.
You have 48 hours to pm me with your decision. I will send PM for more info.
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo