In post 101, JarJarDrinks wrote:strongly townreading Dunn. I think he was right when scumreading Rask.
I don't really like Zach as scum though. I can see him making that post as a joke.
VOTE: Raskolnikov
There's several Rask posts I don't like. Gonna point em out in a few.
In post 109, JarJarDrinks wrote:He's talking about a wagon on himself. How can there be value in a fast wagon on town on page 2? This post looks designed to let people know how pro-town he is.In post 35, Raskolnikov wrote:Eh, I can't be bothered to seriously address this atm.
A fast wagon here actually has some value thoughso this isn't completely terrible.
Again: lemme non-chalantley make sure the town knows I'm not worried about being lynched by implying that I'm totally cool w/ being pressured.In post 45, Raskolnikov wrote:I actually like dunn's aggressiveness
In post 45, Raskolnikov wrote:I'm not sure whether he's legitimately tunnellingor pretending and exaggerating in order to get an emotional reaction.These posts look like subtle attempts to convey to the town that Dunn isn't actually scumreading him.In post 49, Raskolnikov wrote:Actually sorting this out so early is a mess because I have to consider ego andbecause town lying for reactions is hard to tellapart from scum lying for malicious purposes.
Another LAMIST postIn post 57, Raskolnikov wrote:Or even if you don't want to think about drmy you can def give your view on dunn and me at this point.
So now he's worried about the people defending him. Even though he voted DRMY for jumping on him. So I guess it's scummy to vote for Rask and it's scummy to defend him?In post 77, Raskolnikov wrote:Ironically everyone defending me for no reason is more worrying that dunn possibly confbias tunneling here.
In post 111, JarJarDrinks wrote:Bad read?In post 105, Dunnstral wrote:Maybe you can explain to me why town zach votes me in that scenario
I'm not exactly townreading Zach. But I don't think Zach and Rask can be scumbuddies and I think Rask is scum.
In post 157, JarJarDrinks wrote:Triv could be scum. I think Zach/Dunn is town/town.
Still think Rask is bad. If he is town then that Yoshi post does look pretty terrible.
In post 233, JarJarDrinks wrote:@transend. Not gonna say that you voting for me is scummy. But I do hate how you came in the thread whan u did and pretty much ignored everything happening @ the time.
How do you not give an opinion on Dunn v Zach? Or tell us what u think of leading vote-getter Rask?
Furthermore, if you are townreading Rask then why not mention that I'm pushing a lynch of your townread as a reason to vote for me?
In post 329, JarJarDrinks wrote:VOTE: inspectorscout
I just read his ISO and so much fluff. There's like barely any opinions on anyone. And when he finally does give his reads:it's basically townreading the guy that everyone is townreading and then weak-ass scumreads on 3 of the people that everyone else is suspecting.Spoiler:
And like all of his scum reads are "This guy seems like scum but IDK maybe not."
Just a list of strange reads there. WHy the F does he mention Kush as a null read for making ONE post but then he lumps everyone else in the nulls saying "Yah everyone i didnt mention is here too because they didnt post enough yet or just cuz i have absolutely no idea about them yet"?
False alarm dudes. Was making a case on JarJar, got about a third of the way through day 1, then my browser fucking closed and now I'm just pissed.In post 336, JarJarDrinks wrote:Not sure where ur seeing towniness. His ISO is just so much fluff. Setup spec, play by play, and just lots of going w/ town sentiment. Like every read he gives comes w/ an "although I could be wrong" type of comment.In post 334, Transcend wrote:I personally lean on it being a newbtown list given, that he's been towny throughout the rest of the game.
what are u seeing that looks town in his posts?