Micro 631: Pick Someone Else's Character Mafia! Game Over!

[KuroiXHF]

LONG!

Vote Count 1.3

Aristophanes - (3/5)

- Karnos, Vedith, McMenno

Rhazhbash - (0/5)

-

Klingoncelt - (0/4)

-

Aeronaut - (1/5)

- Razhbash

Maruchan - (0/5)

-

McMenno - (2/5)

- Maruchan, Creature

Creature - (0/5)

-

Vedith - (1/5)

- Aristophanes

Karnos - (1/5)

- Klingoncelt

NOT VOTING:

Aeronaut

With nine alive, it takes five to lynch!

(expired on 2016-08-15 20:30:00)

[Aristophanes]

UNVOTE:
Forgot to do that.

Where is Klingon? I want them to be here and catch scum with me!

[Klingoncelt]

UNVOTE:
Forgot to do that.

Where is Klingon? I want them to be here and catch scum with me!

Here.

I'm having a later than usual RL night.

I think it might be Aeronaut and Karnos.

I'm already voting Karnos. For lurking.

Join me, let's see where this goes.

[McMenno]

@Aeronaut it didn't feel like scum vedith to me. but his playstyle also could've been different because he knew he was IC, so that's not saying much

VOTE: McMenno

He'd be more talkative if he were town.

^bad case

what I'm wondering is that we have a confirmed hated and an IC, hated is usually town, so we somehow have 2 conftown? there must be a bunch of negative utility, then...

[Vedith]

I think it might be Aeronaut and Karnos.

Terrible, just terrible!

[Aristophanes]

2 conftown

Nah. At the best we have .75 conftown.
.5 from an unconfirmed IC, .25 (or "likely town") from the Hated modifier.

[Aristophanes]

I'm already voting Karnos. For lurking.

Join me, let's see where this goes.

Okay!

VOTE: Karnos

[Creature]

VOTE: karnos

[McMenno]

bad votes

[Aristophanes]

bad votes

Instead of calling these bad, tell us what's good pls

[McMenno]

well

not random lurkers

ari wagon looks good

[Aristophanes]

But Ari is sheeping wagons in order to generate content, which is more than most can say they're doing.
Most of the playerlist could be called "random lurkers" if you wanted.

[karnos]

I'm not random, and now I'm not lurking. TBH I just don't see much serious content to respond to, it feels like we are in an extended RVS.

We have plenty of time still, at least.

[RhazhBash]

I agree with karnos. Nothing's really happened and I'm not the best at getting the ball rolling. Also prodge.

[Aristophanes]

I'm not the best at getting the ball rolling. Also prodge.

That's definitely not the way to do it...

[Aeronaut]

I'm not random, and now I'm not lurking. TBH I just don't see much serious content to respond to, it feels like we are in an extended RVS.

We have plenty of time still, at least.

I hate this post.

Would be fine lynching this or creature today tbh

[Aeronaut]

actually nah. I'm feeling this instead

VOTE: Marachan

[Klingoncelt]

I think it might be Aeronaut and Karnos.

Terrible, just terrible!

Because why?

[Aeronaut]

Mod:

I'm going to be V/LA from today until sunday. Going on a hiking trip!

[Maruchan]

Voting me for being V/LA on leave visiting my family after being deployed for 8 months and not seeing them for a year. I am also seeing my best friend for the first time in over a year, going to a cousin's wedding, going to an aunt's wedding, and trying to file my bankruptcy paperwork before I go back to work on the 15th.

Good reason to vote me, becasue I'm lurking (Y)


anyways, nothing interesting has been going on, like someone earlier pointed out, I feel like we're in an extended RVS/RQS. No real content has happened yet, so I haven't felt the need to post about it yet either. As soon as real content happens, I'll post, as I am skimming the thread daily to make sure I don't miss anything majorly important.

[Aristophanes]

Karnos and I are at L-2. Vedith got to L-1 and had the fake hammer fun. Yet there is no content.

The people who complain about lack of content do so without providing content, and to proddodge.

Those not proddodging are V/LA.

Wtf is this game!? Lol

[McMenno]

okay, I think this leads a little more "gasoline", so to say

VOTE: karnos

[McMenno]

needs*

[karnos]

I'm town, don't lynch me.

[McMenno]

I'm town, don't lynch me.

topkek defence