koggz could choose to participate in either ptIn post 671, McMenno wrote:I would like all people who can view the matrix/astral pt to claim this, please
instead chose to gift something special to jaereed
koggz could choose to participate in either ptIn post 671, McMenno wrote:I would like all people who can view the matrix/astral pt to claim this, please
In post 673, Reasonably Rational wrote:I believe that's L-2.
I believe this is the point where I yell at people a bit to slow down etc.
That is all.
-Cerb
In post 678, Yume wrote:I can view Astral PT.
Because your personal opinion doesn't equal fact.In post 640, MathBlade wrote:It doesn't matter what your opinion is: what matters is mine. I absolutely do not agree with you on it. To me a low content poster is a lurker. There is a definition on the wiki called active lurking that sums up thoughts nicely. It is the amount of content that is provided to where I define a lurker.In post 626, Klingoncelt wrote:Yes, I'm always a low-content player.In post 622, Reasonably Rational wrote:
..
You are a low content player. Always.
You are rarely around, and you do not post very much when you are around. Always.
These are not necessarily bad things, but they are things lurkers do. Just because you are not attempting to lurk, it does not mean that your play isn't analogous to that of lurkers.
Why are you so offended by someone choosing to use a shorthand for describing your play style?
-Cerb
Deal.
It's better that I keep my low content limited to a few sentences in a few posts as opposed to wallposts of fluff, no?
But that's not what MathBlade said.
She said I lurk. Lurk means hang around and not do anything.
I don't do that.
I'll often log into a game and then have a shit-ton of meatworld things to do, so it takes me hours to go through a few pages.
But that's not lurking.
Sometimes I can come in, read through, make my post(s) and split.
That's not lurking.
I don't lurk. I don't have time to lurk.
Therefore until you do stuff like you are now, I will always consider you a lurker. To quote you: "Deal."
The question becomes why does how I perceive you bother you so much?
Pretty sure I did answer.In post 647, Reasonably Rational wrote:@dm: I don't believe it was a nonsensical comment to make either, I was merely giving an example of a reason why a post might be concerning coming from one slot while being unremarkable coming from another.
Walk me through the "no clue about cowboy". He's easily one of the slots with the most actual content to go off of.
Also, your catchup post didn't register for me at all. As in, there was nothing stated in it that made me want to ask you specific questions on the first read.
@Mathblade: Koggz is a she, and the third person thing is standard posting for her. Seconding the question about the selective mechanics discussion. Also, I already asked KC why she cared about your opinion, and she didn't bother answering.
-Cerb
Umm... are you wanting me to post exactly what I'm doing minute-to-minute? Won't be happening.In post 648, MathBlade wrote:
Pedit: KlingonCelt as they said have many different things to do in meat world at times. I asked again specifically to see if a certain response comes up. But now that you mentioned ignoring it is invalid. *sigh*
I care because it's a dishonest representation.In post 683, Reasonably Rational wrote:You responded to the post, but your response did not include a reason why you care if mathblade calls you a lurker.
-Cerb
It's better to have too many Scumreads than too many Townreads.
I have no access whatsoever to either of the PTs at this time.In post 671, McMenno wrote:
I would like all people who can view the matrix/astral pt to claim this, please
Because Koggz participate in setup spec in a small way and Koggz says they have no problem with it. Ergo Koggz likes setup spec. Koggz doesn't have to say certain words to leave an impression.In post 464, Koggz wrote:In post 443, Reasonably Rational wrote:Everyone, thoughts on likelihood of scum within those separate groupings?
-Cerbkoggz think this approach is flawedIn post 444, Space Cowboy wrote:I'd say it's safe to assume there's a scum in both groups.
unless alignment not chosen randomly
Ditt to the O.In post 687, Klingoncelt wrote:I have no access whatsoever to either of the PTs at this time.In post 671, McMenno wrote:
I would like all people who can view the matrix/astral pt to claim this, please
you think koggz like setup spec because koggz respond to reasonably rational question?In post 688, MathBlade wrote:Because Koggz participate in setup spec in a small way and Koggz says they have no problem with it. Ergo Koggz likes setup spec. Koggz doesn't have to say certain words to leave an impression.In post 464, Koggz wrote:In post 443, Reasonably Rational wrote:Everyone, thoughts on likelihood of scum within those separate groupings?
-Cerbkoggz think this approach is flawedIn post 444, Space Cowboy wrote:I'd say it's safe to assume there's a scum in both groups.
unless alignment not chosen randomly
@KlingonCelt -- Neither is yours. In this case it is my perception of you and I am that arbiter. Right now you are not lurking. Before you were.
And I do not expect that no. I wanted to see how you responded to that question because IMHO you respond to pressure as town and scum as different alignments.
it is more like koggz asking if you believe in god and then if you give an answer assuming you like to talk about religionIn post 691, MathBlade wrote:Math thinks Koggz likes setup spec because of how they responded not because they did.
It is not a leap. If Math says they have zero problems with cheese and then is seen eating cheese, it is therefore a logical conclusion math likes cheese. Similarly you did the same. The last question Math does not follow.
show where koggz is selective about like and not like setup speculationIn post 645, MathBlade wrote:Math wonder why koggz likes setup spec but then is selective about where they like it being used. Math wonders why Koggz is not responding to more players. This worries Math.
Math is concerned that maybe Cowboy is town lynchbait then Koggz is scum.
Any particular reason for the third person talk Koggz? Would Koggz prefer a specific pronoun?
I agree with these two. Although, I am a bit nervous about SC's flip, because when people are this scummy looking pretty much right out the gate, they obviously really do flip town a lot. I still think he's the best vote atm and all his interactions could be a gold mine of information.
Indeed. In this game lynching for information, already a bad idea, is even less helpful than normal.In post 698, MathBlade wrote:Lynched players wind up in prison, rather than killed outright. A maximum of two players may return from the game after being imprisoned. Lynched players do not flip until no one can be released from prison anymore. There may or may not be mechanics that allow people to communicate with those in prison. When no one can escape or be released from prison anymore, all players in prison will flip and will die. All flips are confirmed accurate (no actresses/tricksters, death millers, godfathers, etc).
^^ Lynched players do not flip WorldzMine