Mini Normal 1814 Machiavellian Mafia (Game Over)

[MariaR]

Dw answer me this please: Why are you trying to lynch Ira when that was the ONLY person CR pushed on the whole game?

I've been reconsidering but I've tunneled partners the whole game before.

If we assume Ira was scum and this was the case and CR got Ira lynched wouldn't you think that makes CR the prime NK there leaving scum with only 1 mafia I doubt anyone with half a brain would risk that

[MariaR]

To add onto that the last scum wouldn't even get the credit for pushing Ira so that makes it even worse.

[Nero Cain]

Way back when it was p common play for the traitor to attack the scum, get shot at or something and get recruited. Obviously it doesn't work like that in normals anymore but still CR kne who the scum were thus Ira and Elyse are prob not scum. We should be lynching DW today.

[MariaR]

Not until he answers my questions.

[Zap Rowsdower]

I wanted ira lynched ???

And it didn't occur to you that you could be wrong about ira and that you'd be royally screwing over town if ira wound up flipping town?

[Nero Cain]

Zap stop posturing and bus DW

[Zap Rowsdower]

ok well, both me and Elyse have done "reaction" tests and you have no trouble scum reading us so?

"BUT DW DID TWO!"

I think his "tests" are null and I'm having a hard time seeing you as town believe that he's townie but Elyse and I are not. Also I'm p sure that it was Elyse that fakeclaimed a guilty on Maria...not DW. I think DW's "reaction" test was fakeclaiming a guilty on Elyse. I think he DID call her town but has since backtracked and is scumreading her as town.

K, well. One, I've soured on my scumread on Elyse. Not entirely because of the reaction test she did at the beginning of the game, but yeah.

Two, Elyse's reaction test at the beginning of the game wasn't a fake guilty. All she said was that Maria had townslipped. Similarly, your reaction test(s?) were not fake guilties. Which is why I read yours and Elyse's actions differently than I read Dw's. Because the actions were different.

Asking me to have the same opinion of three different players based on three separate sets of actions which are all different from each other is like asking me why I like the Toyota Camry but not the Mitsubishi Lancer or the Ford Taurus. All are sedans, but I only trust one to not cough its engine onto the ground after 100,000 miles.

Three, I think you're misunderstanding my approach to Dw right now. I've been townreading him and now I'm starting to question it. Which is why I'm trying to get some dialogue going and get perspective as I sort through my own thoughts about the slot.

[Zap Rowsdower]

Zap stop posturing and bus DW

Why should he be the lynch over BYF today?

[MariaR]

Zap stop posturing and bus DW

Join my Zap bw?????

[Dwlee99]

Dw answer me this please: Why are you trying to lynch Ira when that was the ONLY person CR pushed on the whole game?

I've been reconsidering but I've tunneled partners the whole game before.

If we assume Ira was scum and this was the case and CR got Ira lynched wouldn't you think that makes CR the prime NK there leaving scum with only 1 mafia I doubt anyone with half a brain would risk that

Scum probably have some sort of way to detect the traitor like a cop. Even if they don't they could think "Why was CR

so

sure ira was scum. Not to mention that CR wasn't really even pushing ira iirc.

[Dwlee99]

Dw answer me this please: Why are you trying to lynch Ira when that was the ONLY person CR pushed on the whole game?

I've been reconsidering but I've tunneled partners the whole game before.

If we assume Ira was scum and this was the case and CR got Ira lynched wouldn't you think that makes CR the prime NK there leaving scum with only 1 mafia I doubt anyone with half a brain would risk that

Scum probably have some sort of way to detect the traitor like a cop. Even if they don't they could think "Why was CR

so

sure ira was scum." Not to mention that CR wasn't really even pushing ira iirc.

[MariaR]

So you're saying...there's a mafia sided cop...um I don't really know how to react to this

[Dwlee99]

Have you never seen a traitor before?

[Dwlee99]

The only game I've played with a traitor iirc had a mafia cop.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=64645

[Nero Cain]

[quote="In post 1882, Zap Rowsdower"][/quote]
one is confirmed scum.

[Dwlee99]

nero are you softing a guilty on me?

[Nero Cain]

its not soft.

[Dwlee99]

So you are hard claiming a guilty on me?
I just rechecked my role pm I'm not a miller lol

[Nero Cain]

i am yes

[Dwlee99]

VOTE: nero

[Zap Rowsdower]

I apologize for whatever role I've played in Nero's devolution into pettiness. All I can say is that maybe if we ignore it we can actually achieve a lynch.

On BYF, preferably.

[Nero Cain]

BYF lynch is shit.

[MariaR]

Dear fucking god not this shit again can you stop?

Unless Nero is srs then I'll vote Dw without a problem and say sorry to whoever is town in Zap/Gerry

[MariaR]

My head is spinning cause I can never tell who the fuck is srs with these guilty claims and who's just being a moron I want to punch.

[Nero Cain]

ok well, both me and Elyse have done "reaction" tests and you have no trouble scum reading us so?

"BUT DW DID TWO!"

I think his "tests" are null and I'm having a hard time seeing you as town believe that he's townie but Elyse and I are not. Also I'm p sure that it was Elyse that fakeclaimed a guilty on Maria...not DW. I think DW's "reaction" test was fakeclaiming a guilty on Elyse. I think he DID call her town but has since backtracked and is scumreading her as town.

K, well. One, I've soured on my scumread on Elyse. Not entirely because of the reaction test she did at the beginning of the game, but yeah.

Two, Elyse's reaction test at the beginning of the game wasn't a fake guilty.

All she said was that Maria had townslipped

. Similarly, your reaction test(s?) were not fake guilties. Which is why I read yours and Elyse's actions differently than I read Dw's. Because the actions were different.

Asking me to have the same opinion of three different players based on three separate sets of actions which are all different from each other is like asking me why I like the

Toyota Camry but not the Mitsubishi Lancer or the Ford Taurus. All are sedans, but I only trust one to not cough its engine onto the ground after 100,000 miles.

Three, I think you're misunderstanding my approach to Dw right now. I've been townreading him and now I'm starting to question it. Which is why I'm trying to get some dialogue going and get perspective as I sort through my own thoughts about the slot.

no she didn't. She said that Maria scumslipped. And then town read her for her reaction.

two of those are jap crap. ford is best.

DW's "reaction" tests were basically fake daycop and then a fake guilty on Ira.

And then you call people town as a result?

this also didn't happen and it wasn't on Maria. I mean, could you get your facts wrong? yes Could you deliberately spread misinformation. yes. The later has clear scum motivations.