I could. I won't.
What slot do you find my presented reads confusing on?
Because a reads list of this game would be a boring spread of a giant null pile - and since the last reads you asked me had both been very clearly stated by me already I am unimpressed by the request.
In post 4578, Drixx wrote:On that note: @Thor - Why are you town? Your claim has obvious problems. If you're town that sucks for you, but it doesn't change the fact that it looks like a mocked up claim that can't be confirmed or contradicted. Give some effort so we can read you. Thanks.
Why am I not town? The only issue with my play is the Gunsmith result - so there isn't a scum case on me. My play here fully fits my town (and scum, natch) habits, so it's a silly question.
My claim does not have obvious problems. It has a dearth of info, but that's a different ball of wax.
My claim can be confirmed or contradicted - I have a whole lot of potential evidence for anyone who is a tracker, a watcher, or a role investigative any and all of which is confirmable due to my constant night actions.
I am already unamused by all the people implying lack of effort from me - what game are you reading?
In post 4613, Cookie Bakers wrote:My vote stays on Thor because it is my preference but if you disagree on optimal strategy, vote DGB.
"Mah vote is going to be on the non-confirmed scum and not the confimred scum because dat is da bestest play optimal, yah!"
Titus...you're being really dumb right now.
In post 4690, Boem_u_dusi wrote:I have a few problems with this claim.
N1 roleblocking Accountant is fine from town POV.
N2 no result on DGB looks too convenient, why would someone roleblock you out of all players in this game?
N3 rolecop on VA-11 Hall-A is a total bullshit from town POV. I don't believe this at all.
N4 no visits on Egg? That's impossible unless we have a ninja vig or a very altruistic SK.
This is outed scum.
N1 - oh goodie.
N2 - go back and read the thread buddy, you're making silly presumptions on reality.
N3 - exactly how is this a 'bs' action? Let's be specific and we can talk about it - seemed like a fine action to me.
N4 - I agree, but that is the result that I got. Feel free to describe why theory scum Thor would investigate enemy scum/his scumbuddy and then refuse to reveal the person who killed them. Is my desperate goal not to tell enemy scum who the Vig is? Or to not reveal my own scumbuddy who killed the enemy scum (and then what theory night action was I doing instead)? And in what world is it super altruistic SK who kills a claimed and confirmed RBer? Killing an RBer is...y'know, sorta a good play for an SK no matter what alignment Egg was. Killing a Vig or an investigative role is relatively meaningless.
You're making noise, and you're not talking as derpy as Titus, but you aren't hitting any balls either.
I note that it kind of took me mentioning "hey...derps, confirmed scum" and suddenlt the wagon on me evaporates despite my claim being pretty 'meh'.
Assured scum driven wagon - you're all welcome for that one. I'll give it a once over later.
Unvote: DGB
Vote: DrippingGoofball