Mini Normal 1825 - Game Over

[gameplay506]

You asked me, I replied to you
So it doesn't matter since you have no morr questions, no?

[RyanK]

True.

Sorry everyone. Maybe some of my RL activities are affecting my play.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

So apparently the Mod doesn't announce replacements!!

Hi all, I'm replacing somebody. Will read up when I can.

[Accountant]

VC 1.08

Dierfire (5)

: Saru, golden009, rb, Cass, Martha Zolanski

RyanK (2)

: gameplay506, pitoli

gameplay506 (2)

: Dierfire, RyanK

Naomi-Tan (1)

: Chuck

Martha Zolanski (1)

: Naomi-Tan

Not Voting:

Glitch, BlueBloodedToffee

With 13 alive, the majority is 7.

The deadline is in (expired on 2016-09-07 16:06:30)

BlueBloodedToffee replaces Comparing Realities.

[Accountant]

I do announce replacements, but it was time for a VC and I was posting them both together.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

BlueBloodedToffee replaces Comparing Realities.

Yeah he does!

Pedit - I was only joking Mod

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Dier is leading wagon. Interesting.

Mod, would it be possible for future VCs to have the biggest wagon at the top of the VC?

[Accountant]

Okay.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Thank you

[Dierfire]

I return, briefly.

As a blanket response to those commenting on the reasoning for my vote, I've no objection to the characterization of the reasoning as weak (except perhaps to the extent that they imply that stronger reasons/votes were available).

I suppose that the next question is whether I'm reading any specific reaction to my vote as suspicious.

Since golden009 dodged my question about what stronger vote was available (184), and since I am suspicious of his approach to the initial wagon on gameplay506, I am moving my vote.

UNVOTE: gameplay506
VOTE: golden009

I've no objection to the vote by rb in 214 or Cass in 304. I've specific questions coming for Saru and Martha.

[Dierfire]

@Saru

It's unclear to me why you feel that I, as Town, wouldn't cast that vote for gameplay506. Could you further explain how our previous games have led you to that conclusion?

[Dierfire]

@Martha

I can't explain this posts made by you.

Which parts should I explain better?

Also, it's difficult for me to follow your posts when you post your reactions/responses to post numbers. For the future, could I persuade you to either use quotes or to provide more details about which ideas/players are involved?

[Dierfire]

@Cass

Hm, after a strong start this seems to be stalling a bit. So I will for now
UNVOTE: Gameplay and
VOTE: Dierfire (that's the 4th vote)

You need to participate more and defend yourself.

Also, this could be a scumslip:

Dier fixed quote tag

If rb is Town, his vote is marginally more likely to be on a Mafia player than if he were Mafia. Also, if rb is Town then all other players are marginally more likely to be Mafia (from 3/12 to 3/11).

Wouldn't those numbers be 3/11 vs 3/10? Eh? Or are you not counting yourself as town for some reason?

If you're asking me to "participate more" before 24 hours have passed since my last post, I fear that my activity in this game is destined to disappoint you.
I believe that my numbers are correct. If I am Town and rb is Town, then I'm looking for three Mafia players out of the remaining eleven. If the number were 3/10 then I'd need to have another player as Town--who would that be?

[Dierfire]

Remainder items:

There are a few players with high post counts, but on whom I don't feel that I have a good handle yet (RyanK, pitoli, Naomi-Tan). These will be my priority when I return next.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Hi Dier!

Why are you being wagoned?

[Martha Zolanski]

I return, briefly.

As a blanket response to those commenting on the reasoning for my vote, I've no objection to the characterization of the reasoning as weak (except perhaps to the extent that they imply that stronger reasons/votes were available).

I suppose that the next question is whether I'm reading any specific reaction to my vote as suspicious.

Since golden009 dodged my question about what stronger vote was available (184), and since I am suspicious of his approach to the initial wagon on gameplay506, I am moving my vote.

UNVOTE: gameplay506
VOTE: golden009

I've no objection to the vote by rb in 214 or Cass in 304. I've specific questions coming for Saru and Martha.

Can you please explain why our reasonings are weak for voting you?

@Martha

I can't explain this posts made by you.

Which parts should I explain better?

Also, it's difficult for me to follow your posts when you post your reactions/responses to post numbers. For the future, could I persuade you to either use quotes or to provide more details about which ideas/players are involved?

No need to explain things.

Yep. I'll do that! I'll still do post numbers but I'll label it from whom this post was made. Quotes are never kind to me!

PEdit:You should read back, Blue. Also, Welcome!

[Cass]

Why I changed my vote? Dierfire is in my top-4 and it is time for a wagon. L-2 doesn't bother me in this set-up. If scum want to hang themselves by quickhammering, that's a-ok by me. Gameplay had been defending himself for a while. I'm still ok with lynching him today, but it's early still. We're not yet seriously lynching anyone, just seriously voting.

@Dierfire: Oh, right, there are 13 players in this set-up. My bad. But why the vote for Golden? Do you feel there is scum on your wagon? Also, your number of posts is fine, but I would like it if they had more content. Maybe just a day 1 thing?

[Cass]

Ebwop: I mean, other scum beside Golden.

[Martha Zolanski]

Why I changed my vote? Dierfire is in my top-4 and it is time for a wagon. L-2 doesn't bother me in this set-up. If scum want to hang themselves by quickhammering, that's a-ok by me. Gameplay had been defending himself for a while. I'm still ok with lynching him today, but it's early still. We're not yet seriously lynching anyone, just seriously voting.

@Dierfire: Oh, right, there are 13 players in this set-up. My bad. But why the vote for Golden? Do you feel there is scum on your wagon? Also, your number of posts is fine, but I would like it if they had more content. Maybe just a day 1 thing?

There's something wrong here..

Wdym about it is time for a wagon? Why do you want scums to quickhammer? Yep, Gameplay is defending himself and you look agreeing with it, But still you want him lynched and you say it's early?

[pitoli]

I don't see how Dierfire is scummier than RyanK right now.

Anybody around the thread right now?

[Martha Zolanski]

I don't see how Dierfire is scummier than RyanK right now.

Anybody around the thread right now?

Present. I agree with this even though Dierfire is on my scum list.

[pitoli]

From least to most scummy, is it (Naomi -> RyanK -> Dierfire) for you?

[Martha Zolanski]

From least to most scummy, is it (Naomi -> RyanK -> Dierfire) for you?

Exactly.

[pitoli]

Talk to me about Naomi. What are things she's said/done that you can't see in line with a town slot?

[Martha Zolanski]

Talk to me about Naomi. What are things she's said/done that you can't see in line with a town slot?

189 - Your town read on Naomi looks more like her way of not getting suspected. Being open about that makes her earn a town read thus she'll get a town read. Then, She'll never be suspected as mafia.

Well this is for me. Idk if this is accurate but this is my gut feeling.