Newbie 1734 - Happy (Game Over)

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:22 pm

The thing is realistically it actually doesn't (and seemingly never did) matter what I think of you because literally no one else doubts you or even CONSIDERED any of my points. Every single person brushed it off.
But now I've made enough noise on this people won't forget. Lategame those could go back to this if I'm gone and you're alive in lylo or whatever, I've done as much as I could and pretty much "due diligence" so to speak.

But even so the response is at least half satisfying.

Zyf · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:22 pm

In post 1248, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1246, Zyf wrote:
In post 1243, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do maintain a theoretical vote on BBT.
That's not gonna work.
I'm stating intent to hammer while not at l-1.

No one's gonna appreciate that b/c it can potentially give scum free info
We went through this like 7 hours ago it's very simple

Zyf · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:23 pm

In post 1250, Raskolnikov wrote:The thing is realistically it actually doesn't (and seemingly never did) matter what I think of you because literally no one else doubts you or even CONSIDERED any of my points. Every single person brushed it off.
But now I've made enough noise on this people won't forget. Lategame those could go back to this if I'm gone and you're alive in lylo or whatever, I've done as much as I could and pretty much "due diligence" so to speak.

But even so the response is at least half satisfying.

At least i fucking responded to everything jesus

Also pls stop throwing shade while voting elsewhere
It makes u hypocritical

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:24 pm

You don't actually know what throwing shade means.

Zyf · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:24 pm

I considered your points
I would have, anyway, if they weren't about me

Zyf · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:25 pm

In post 1253, Raskolnikov wrote:You don't actually know what throwing shade means.

Unofficially indicating you scumread someone while saying otherwise?

Infinity 324 · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:27 pm

Rask, I definitely heard your points, I just don't think they make him scum, especially given what I know about him.

Gallynukes · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:29 pm

In post 1240, Zyf wrote:@gally-
My first and only completed scumgame in a balanced setup:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=67015
D1 was 55 pages, don't think there are many longer ones for a newbie

What percentage of posts you have in that? I'm betting the farm on over 51℅ and laughing my way to the bank.

And ye listen... henceforth it shall be known, any games with both Zyf and Gally together shall be the bane of all mods tallying votes and any not Hooked On Phonics. Verily. It is known.

Sorry, I'm fucking exhausted and have been knocking back vodka sodas like water. No work tomorrow so I can't convince myself to go to bed while it's still active in here. Don't mind me.

Gallynukes · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:30 pm

In post 1243, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do maintain a theoretical vote on BBT.

My man!

Zyf · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:31 pm

Jfc i managed to crash my phone by trying to go to my iso lmfao

Zyf · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:32 pm

In post 1258, Gallynukes wrote:
In post 1243, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do maintain a theoretical vote on BBT.
My man!

If it didn't work for you it's not gonna work for them. Please don't convince them they should continue that
I mean, unless you want that "longest cancer D1" record in which case by all means go ahead

Zyf · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:33 pm

In post 1257, Gallynukes wrote:
In post 1240, Zyf wrote:@gally-
My first and only completed scumgame in a balanced setup:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=67015
D1 was 55 pages, don't think there are many longer ones for a newbie
What percentage of posts you have in that? I'm betting the farm on over 51℅ and laughing my way to the bank.

And ye listen... henceforth it shall be known, any games with both Zyf and Gally together shall be the bane of all mods tallying votes and any not Hooked On Phonics. Verily. It is known.

Sorry, I'm fucking exhausted and have been knocking back vodka sodas like water. No work tomorrow so I can't convince myself to go to bed while it's still active in here. Don't mind me.

I ended up with like 28% at one point
So roughly twice as much as my "fair share"

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:34 pm

Thinking over the players, I think I can revote safely. Pulling out the blue again, this time for actually important shit.

This vote is putting BBT at L-1. If anyone hammers before Grendel indicates he is fully caught up, it shall be considered grounds for immediate suspicion.

VOTE: BBT

Gallynukes · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:36 pm

Drunken GallyLog Entry #1: Pay attention to Rask's and Infinity's relationship going forward. You're probably going to forget this, but whatever -- pay attention anyway. Adapt and overcome and what not. This concludes this entry. There's probably nothing of substance here, but hey, you never know. Over and out.

Zyf · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:38 pm

In post 1262, Gamma Emerald wrote:Thinking over the players, I think I can revote safely. Pulling out the blue again, this time for actually important shit.

This vote is putting BBT at L-1. If anyone hammers before Grendel indicates he is fully caught up, it shall be considered grounds for immediate suspicion.

VOTE: BBT

I concurr
I recommend doing this separately too

L-1

Gallynukes · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:38 pm

In post 1260, Zyf wrote:
In post 1258, Gallynukes wrote:
In post 1243, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do maintain a theoretical vote on BBT.
My man!
If it didn't work for you it's not gonna work for them. Please don't convince them they should continue that
I mean, unless you want that "longest cancer D1" record in which case by all means go ahead

Totally agree. That was meant to be tongue in cheek. Gamma, put your vote back on brosef.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:38 pm

In post 1265, Gallynukes wrote:
In post 1260, Zyf wrote:
In post 1258, Gallynukes wrote:
In post 1243, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do maintain a theoretical vote on BBT.
My man!
If it didn't work for you it's not gonna work for them. Please don't convince them they should continue that
I mean, unless you want that "longest cancer D1" record in which case by all means go ahead
Totally agree. That was meant to be tongue in cheek. Gamma, put your vote back on brosef.

Ninja'd by four minutes DAMN.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:39 pm

In post 1255, Zyf wrote:
In post 1253, Raskolnikov wrote:You don't actually know what throwing shade means.
Unofficially indicating you scumread someone while saying otherwise?

Ah, but what I'm saying isn't inconsistent with anything I said.

I brought up a lot of problems with you and after our exchange I'm partially satisfied, but still don't follow your reads and also recognise going further is more or less pointless.
I'm not ruling you out as scum by any means but what I've done should be a barrier to you winning if you ARE scum and I'm not around later; essentially I could at least say I did everything in my power in the worst case scenario.

Throwing shade OTOH is a sneaky way of making someone look bad without committing to it; pointing out something as scummy in a really shallow easy way or trying to sabotage one's reputation through cowardly means. I don't think I have been by any means subtle here.

Zyf · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:39 pm

In post 1263, Gallynukes wrote:Drunken GallyLog Entry #1: Pay attention to Rask's and Infinity's relationship going forward. You're probably going to forget this, but whatever -- pay attention anyway. Adapt and overcome and what not. This concludes this entry. There's probably nothing of substance here, but hey, you never know. Over and out.

Drunkposting thread's in the speakeasy
Thank you for your cooperation

Zyf · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:40 pm

In post 1267, Raskolnikov wrote:
In post 1255, Zyf wrote:
In post 1253, Raskolnikov wrote:You don't actually know what throwing shade means.
Unofficially indicating you scumread someone while saying otherwise?
Ah, but what I'm saying isn't inconsistent with anything I said.

I brought up a lot of problems with you and after our exchange I'm partially satisfied, but still don't follow your reads and also recognise going further is more or less pointless.
I'm not ruling you out as scum by any means but what I've done should be a barrier to you winning if you ARE scum and I'm not around later; essentially I could at least say I did everything in my power in the worst case scenario.

Throwing shade OTOH is a sneaky way of making someone look bad without committing to it; pointing out something as scummy in a really shallow easy way or trying to sabotage one's reputation through cowardly means. I don't think I have been by any means subtle here.

Fair enough

Zyf · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:41 pm

In post 1265, Gallynukes wrote:
In post 1260, Zyf wrote:
In post 1258, Gallynukes wrote:
In post 1243, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do maintain a theoretical vote on BBT.
My man!
If it didn't work for you it's not gonna work for them. Please don't convince them they should continue that
I mean, unless you want that "longest cancer D1" record in which case by all means go ahead
Totally agree. That was meant to be tongue in cheek. Gamma, put your vote back on brosef.

Lmfao
You had a bad time getting ninja'd didn't you lol

Raskolnikov · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:42 pm

I like how this day 1 is longer than the average complete game.

Gallynukes · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:42 pm

In post 1262, Gamma Emerald wrote:Thinking over the players, I think I can revote safely. Pulling out the blue again, this time for actually important shit.

This vote is putting BBT at L-1. If anyone hammers before Grendel indicates he is fully caught up, it shall be considered grounds for immediate suspicion.

VOTE: BBT

And you shall also be cursed with teh blue balls forevernore.

Gallynukes · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:45 pm

Alright, I'm going to bed. Night kids!

Zyf · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:45 pm

In post 1250, Raskolnikov wrote:The thing is realistically it actually doesn't (and seemingly never did) matter what I think of you because literally no one else doubts you or even CONSIDERED any of my points. Every single person brushed it off.
But now I've made enough noise on this people won't forget. Lategame those could go back to this if I'm gone and you're alive in lylo or whatever, I've done as much as I could and pretty much "due diligence" so to speak.

But even so the response is at least half satisfying.

I feel an obligation to pettily correct "due diligence" to "do-diligence"

Anyway my phone apparently didn't register submit earlier b/c what i wanted to say was that in terms of lategame all you've done is give me more stuff to just quote rather than post again abut the same d1 topic