You're pushing Muffin for another reason to soft-claim, despite you giving one. Then, when I highlight this, you say it's not important? Then why were you pushing Muffin? And how could you push Muffin for another reason when you know it exists, because it was one of your reasons?In post 815, iraonavp wrote:What? Well, there was the other reason of not wanring to be protected, but that is not the main reason why and doesn't contradict my argument in a relevant way.2. You argued that being seen as town is the only reason to soft-claim. This is contradicted by your own reasons that you gave for your softclaim.
When did you realise there could be multiple? When ckd crumbed? Or when you read your PM?In post 815, iraonavp wrote:That is not a contradiction.3. This contradiction:(my bold)In post 539, iraonavp wrote: Because I saw that curiouskarmacycle was softclaiming bodyguard becausemy role PM implies the existence of multiple, and I understood his request not to express town-aligned reads because all bodyguards die if they visit the same target, not just one. And, I am card like The Bulge who you guys lynched for no reason.In post 729, iraonavp wrote: There's only reason to crumb when I realized that there could be multiple, when I saw curiouskarmadog's crumb.
Why are you asking these questions?In post 822, iraonavp wrote:Okay, but is that what you think,not just something you can think? Are you bodyguard?
Really? You don't think my conversation with ira is scum-hunting, or the questions I'm asking/points I've made about that, or other comments? Or at least pushing? It's the strongest case that's been presented so far. I don't think this comment has any foundation in my play.In post 836, SirCakez wrote:ISO is all noise and questions that she doesn't do anything with, no real pushing or scumhuntingIn post 768, zMuffinMan wrote:nah, but with players like froot loop, who just naturally sound off, i like having some basis for comparison
why is froot loop scum
I'll be around now to check in until the deadline - it's daytime here which is good, but I don't know if there's that much activity. I understand Seraph's reason to vote DGB, but it's contradicted by the last game I played with DGB as scum (that was an unusual circumstance though, to be fair - she replaced in as scum and was under pressure) when she was pretty trolly and spammy. I have no experience of Katsuki being lurky as scum so I don't know if this is a tell, for me it would be a lurker lynch. Also, I've got questions about some of the people voting Katsuki, so I don't feel super comfortable voting there either.
ira's played the scummiest so far and a lot of their posts and play don't make sense.