Farside, do you believe this is town?In post 1122, Creature wrote:Seriously, look at her scumreads:Not Chara is new.In post 1104, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:ScumReads
Not Chara
Kraskaeaque (kraska77 + lycanfire)
Seraphim
SnarkySnowman
Creature
Kraskaesque are a hydra of newer players.
Seraphim and SnarkySnowman are know as lynchbaits.
grapes sees me as extremely lynchable.
Can you explain how we conveniently ended up in your early scum pool after far called us scum? Also you just called your iso odd shit and said snarky is justified in Sr you. Yet when I call your reads shit you flip outIn post 1115, grapes wrote:This is where the misunderstanding comes in; what we pass for genuine thought processes may be held to different standards.In post 1113, farside22 wrote:This is very untrue.
Kraska listed town reads, pointed to a few things they noted .
Can you iso kraska and quote all the instances where they give a process on their reads that isn't surface level?
And how many are there?
Why? I don't respond to others telling me what to do. That's DOUBLY true for my scumreads. Why should I back off creature?In post 1134, kraskaesque wrote:Lol Titus stop pestering creature he's town
What are your other reads? Farside isn't getting lynched today.In post 1135, SnarkySnowman wrote:Farside is pretty pissed I scum read her huh. And very much in the way of "what the shit everyone townread me you caught me for nonsense reasons"
No.In post 1130, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:Farside, do you believe this is town?In post 1122, Creature wrote:Seriously, look at her scumreads:Not Chara is new.In post 1104, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:ScumReads
Not Chara
Kraskaeaque (kraska77 + lycanfire)
Seraphim
SnarkySnowman
Creature
Kraskaesque are a hydra of newer players.
Seraphim and SnarkySnowman are know as lynchbaits.
grapes sees me as extremely lynchable.
He somehow argues my Not Chara scumread is new despite my plan being to determine who NC's partner was since the start of Day 1?
He's trying to do a new player pass on objectively scummy play (avoiding me and then having crappy posts)
Again, even assuming these players were lynchbaits that has no impact on their alignment.
It should be pretty clear by this page that I'm not scumreading grapes. How grapes sees you has nothing to do with how I see you. I postulated you and NC well before grapes scumread you I believe.
This type of post is clearly a slot more interested in discrediting what I have to say rather than actually reading anything I'm saying. Why would that be the case? Me being right about NC/Chara is as good a suggestion as any.
Also, not jumping to Snarky because I am not certain on them, NC has the larger wagon and I like them as scum better.
meta reads are not very useful to me, especially without specifics or quotes.In post 1131, Creature wrote:It feels like Cakez is playing like he did as scum in TTH.
In post 1135, SnarkySnowman wrote:Farside is pretty pissed I scum read her huh. And very much in the way of "what the shit everyone townread me you caught me for nonsense reasons"
i don't really agree with your reasons either. you're sayjng farside is scum who is angry about being caught for bad reasons?In post 1135, SnarkySnowman wrote:Farside is pretty pissed I scum read her huh. And very much in the way of "what the shit everyone townread me you caught me for nonsense reasons"
If I felt the need to "case" you, I'd be describing your play since the start. I do not. I've just mentioned a few observations. Again, if I made a better case on you, would you sheep it? Nope. This is baseless discrediting.In post 1141, Not Chara wrote:meta reads are not very useful to me, especially without specifics or quotes.In post 1131, Creature wrote:It feels like Cakez is playing like he did as scum in TTH.
my intention isn't to insult, but this has as much bearing as just saying you have a gut read.
Obi: your case on me is badly done and built on the flimsy 'oddness' you mentioned with respect to McMenno and Rational in the pregame.
defending it with 'i've had it for a while' doesn't make it sound better, it just shows that you're not actually examining me, only looking for things you believe you can attack.
In post 1140, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:@Farside, Do you think we could wagon X? You Mastina and I all agree on X being scum. I think it would help more than bickering maybe? I'm pretty sure on NC but I'm told I tunnel too much.
Yeah, I just would like the three of us to agree and see what happens with the wagons. I'm not so concerned about what the target says (unless they actually start obvtowning) but more so with the reactions of other players. Reading players is about determining what they value IMO.In post 1146, farside22 wrote:In post 1140, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:@Farside, Do you think we could wagon X? You Mastina and I all agree on X being scum. I think it would help more than bickering maybe? I'm pretty sure on NC but I'm told I tunnel too much.
Creature, snarky....who else did I agree with.
Seraphim I think was the other one.
I'd say pressure someone that gives the most info.
Mastin: where do you stand on this?
I'm more pissed that players aren't voting for obvious scum then anything.In post 1143, Not Chara wrote:i don't really agree with your reasons either. you're sayjng farside is scum who is angry about being caught for bad reasons?In post 1135, SnarkySnowman wrote:Farside is pretty pissed I scum read her huh. And very much in the way of "what the shit everyone townread me you caught me for nonsense reasons"
are your reasons bad? why should we be listening to you?
Nah but I can be totally honest, my reasons for the initial vote were not exactly lynchworthy by any means. And at first reaction it seemed like town frustration because it was dumb but the tunneling is making me think otherwise. And pretty confidently, too.In post 1143, Not Chara wrote:i don't really agree with your reasons either. you're sayjng farside is scum who is angry about being caught for bad reasons?In post 1135, SnarkySnowman wrote:Farside is pretty pissed I scum read her huh. And very much in the way of "what the shit everyone townread me you caught me for nonsense reasons"
are your reasons bad? why should we be listening to you?