In post 1069, Reasonably Rational wrote:I have a job which is not at a computer now and just moved to a new city and am thus going out of my way to do things and go out. I have been MUCH less of a "presence" as you said in my recent games. I still post quite a bit, but there's been a definite drop since your last time playing with me...and since I'm generally the primary head active in thread for this hydra, that means we're simply not around as much.
You don't need to post frequently to make your presence known.
In post 1069, Reasonably Rational wrote:You do realize that me even talking about ONE read this early in a game is EXTREMELY uncharacteristic. The standard "doesn't have reads, must be scum" argument isn't relevant when applied to me. Think back on your previous experience with me. Now, you could be suspicious of me BECAUSE I was actually willing to establish and share a read, and that would be understandable ( and something I couldn't answer, since I'm only establishing reads this game because of redacted about redacted), but the current reason is not.
I didn't say you having one scumread was scummy. The way you interacted with that read is scummy.
In post 1069, Reasonably Rational wrote:I tend to only develop early scumreads based on obvious contradictions/inconsistencies. I haven't NOTICED any of those yet (other than the mastin ally thing, but considering it causee something that makes her 99% town, it's clearly not an inconsistency caused by scum lies). Why is this relevant? Because there was nothing like that which caused that read. The ONLY reason why I had any suspicions of him was due to a difference in playstyle from what I've seen before, and he immediately showed up and told me there was a game I had played with him before where his play was similar. That means I actually had *no* reason to be suspicious of him in the first place, and thus said suspicion dissolved.
And this is suppose to convince me that the read was real in the first place?
A post that isn't reviewed.
In post 1069, Reasonably Rational wrote:Regarding Drixxs push on FB: FB was with us in SD2. He *should* be aware of the massive rift that formed in that game due to Titus' hydra and our hydra having extreme levels of paranoia about one another. There's not the same DEPTH of experience regarding the interactions between Titus and ourselves that we personally have of course,, but that point about our history should be well known to him. I agree that the rest of his push was a stretch.
I've NEVER actually seen fire this involved, as either alignment so I'm not sure what to think..sorta like the thing with the beeboy head of OWK. Non standard behaviors from both those slots, but the behaviors differ from their playstyle, not their scum or town meta in particular.
What's off to you about beeboy's playstyle so far? Not posting as much?
Why do you keep trying to answer for drixx about that push? Nothing gets accomplished here, why is this a thing that people think is good for games?
If I'm wrong, talking to me about why I think you're scum isn't gonna make me see that.
I called you scum a lot in prequel too and like I flat out just called one of your posts bad and you don't respond to it.
Nothing about you feels right and I think you're scum.
And I don't know a place to engage you from because you have no world to compare to at the present time.
