Newbie 1737 - Game Over
-
-
kuror0 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: June 12, 2012
-
-
SkiddishRaddish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: August 17, 2016
Please let me know if I'm forgetting something in my posts because it feels like I am.
Firstly, this could be just linguistic, but it hasn't been sitting well with me and I'd like to mention it in case I get lynched so others can keep it in mind:
Spoiler:
If you need me to explain this point let me know, but hopefully the blue font can get across what I'm picking up on.-
-
SkiddishRaddish
-
-
SkiddishRaddish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: August 17, 2016
-
-
SkiddishRaddish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: August 17, 2016
-
-
SkiddishRaddish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: August 17, 2016
VOTE: Map Wolf
I found Oacenth in the slot scummy for her behavior, and I think your posts have rather worsened that read with your short answers that barely defend yourself or not providing answers to questions with hard proof. You seem to try to just post enough to avoid low activity, which is not conducive to good scumhunting, or just a good fun game in general. If you flip innocent then I truly apologize, but we need to lynch and get 100% factual info and I want to make a vote in case I don't have much time to do so tomorrow or Sunday.
Please allow Map Wolf at least another post or 24 hours to make their case before hammering.THIS PUTS MAP WOLF AT L-1.
@ Everyone!!!-
-
grapes
-
-
kuror0 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: June 12, 2012
ok. I will address this now.
1(as in 1st paragraph). One thing is what you do and another is how you do it. I call you scummy for linking players not for making your own analysis which is what I have been trying to get from everyone from the start (even if I suck at it).
2. An AtE on an AtE. AtEception? but I personally don't consider this linked to an alignment to be honest so I will skip it.
3.And I have already stated through the game not only on your reads but anyone making THAT kind of reads why I despise them and find them scummy. The other part I can't remember right now so I ill skip it.
4. I hate you. You actually made me go back to search the exact quote to check.
Dongempire - See below paragraph.
Lmkguy - Too little to get a reading on. You know what you need to do.
Unless I'm that bad at english you LITERALLY used the same paragraph on both. I'm concerned you couldn't even check out your own post.
5. Because I don't feel good making a case on gut reads or 1 weak reason. So I feel comfortable waiting for scum to trip on their own tongue. That's why I'm trying to get as much info as I can this day, because if they can't follow their own train of logic that means they are forging it, and towns don't have a reason to forge reads or thoughts.
Uff almost missed. About Galagya: He was actually my stongest scum read so I was leaving them for last. Due to my time constraints and the low activity I got no time to make a proper post on my case againts them. Due to your answer to my first case I am feeling more and more confident on you as scum.
6. Oh i would have gave you the benefit of the doubt at least. That's why I didn't state my intention or actually voted you right after I laid my case on you, it is early and we have had(is that the right conjugation or w/e it is called?) low activity and I wanted to hear your thoughts/clarification about it. And you weren't even my principal scumread at the time.(reading wtf was I answering I noticed I may have sidetracked). So back on topic, I just said I don't consider usefull/worth or anything your reads on post 90 and I do think you could have jumped to any wagon gm proposed at that time without effort as I explained on some previous post. (at least tried to explain)
7. nope. I used "some people" not "someone" but honestly I cant rememer if it was 1 or 2 more ready to sheep and im in no shape to go back to look right now.
thats it im done /out to sleep
-Fixed tagsLast edited by grapes on Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.Too lazy to be scum.-
-
kuror0 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: June 12, 2012
-
-
kuror0 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: June 12, 2012
-
-
grapes
-
-
LmkGuy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 280
- Joined: August 3, 2016
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
-
boring Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: June 15, 2016
Okay, I'm beginning to feel bad for you now. These HUGE leaps you're making are a sign of someone unaccustomed to rational problem-solving. This little patch of crazy certainly isn't changing my read, but I can see that you're giving this a valiant try, and you should feel happy about that. I get the impression that you're struggling all alone, hoping against hope to make it through the day so you can confer with your partner.In post 255, SkiddishRaddish wrote:Post part 2
:@Boring
If you’re thinking that I have a scum partner that coached me into all this knowledge, then they must have taught meIn post 232, boring wrote:Thank you kuror0, I don't understand how I've managed to miss this over and over.
In post 90, SkiddishRaddish wrote: I don’t want to keep bringing up associatives before the flip, but I’m not happy with how Oacenth and Dongempire are acting towards each other right now. I postulated that they may be the mafia team in post 67 and look what’s happened: The first read Oacenth gave in her current readings (post 74) was on Dongempire which null but more anti-town than not. And Dongempire's last few posts have been getting aggressive towards her and then votes her. It reads like distancing.
This is pretty concerning. I mean, I'm guilty of associating my scum reads, but this goes above and beyond. I have my own hunches as to why inexperienced scum might do this, but I can't think of a single town motivation, newbie or not, for such irrational shading. Not from someone familiar enough with the game to be using this terminology.
This kind of craziness is hard to ignore, and I have to admit that it's scale-tipping for me.
VOTE: SkiddishRaddishall the wrong thingsto be tipping off everyone’s scum radar like this.
Whatever proficiency I have in the terminology is because I’ve played mafia on another website years ago, and a lot of my mafia knowledge back then came from reading games on this site (it was all in the newbie section too, they used more flavor text back then so there were a lot of terms I had to go look up). A lot of these are also in the glossary and abbreviations that Goodmorning posted in her first post which I've constantly been referencing throughout the game to make sure my usage was correct (I had to do some digging to find out what tunneling means tho, lol.)
Any thoughts on Kuror0 now that he's posted?
My thoughts on kuror0 have improved considerably since he's started to contribute. I don't see why anyone would be putting so much effort into ISOs on Day 1. As a preference, those kinds of things are best left as personal notes for a later "day", to be used toward cases. But he's not the only one doing it, so meh, maybe I'm the odd one.
Tunneling is pursuing your reads to the exclusion of all else. It's beyond case-making, and beyond confirmation bias. It's like you have tunnel-vision.-
-
boring Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: June 15, 2016
edit: I'm a little wary of kuror0's hesitation to make a vote. Unless I've totally misread, he thinks SR is scum, but he's not voted. It's not like putting her at L-1 will be a huge deal.
Actually, if we're all pretty sure platinum is town, it might be good to leave the hammer on our two wagons up to him.-
-
goodmorning AnySurvivorAny
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10204
- Joined: October 15, 2012
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)
I've been moving away from a scumread on that slot since before Oacenth replaced out of it. When I got her out of "I don't know what to do" mode, she started looking Town, and Wolf hasn't dropped any tells but Newb ones.In post 266, kuror0 wrote:@gm I hope you explain thoroughly the reasons to avoid that discussion if the time comes. Also what do you think about wolf. Seems you read him as town now but I thought you were reading Oacenth as scum, so anything wolf has done made you change your mind or am I remembering things wrong?
Yes, Wolf's vote on Skiddish is equally opportunistic. But Wolf has already shown a pattern of inward-focused thinking, which his vote is consistent with.On the topic, you pointed raddish vote on wolf. But isn't equally bad wolf's vote on skiddish? I mean he was the first to jump at the closest growing wagon and you were the one to call him out because he wasn't scumhunting... or townhunting. So whats the deal there?
You say "I think his/her posts are good" a lot in that readslist. I want to know which posts you find good and why. You don't have to give a lot of examples, just one or two from each person.In post 268, Map Wolf wrote:
Specific on as to what?In post 253, goodmorning wrote:re: your readslist: can you be more specific?
@Raddish 276: You may notice you've highlighted "consistent" words with two different connotations there. ("Read consistency" = reading most/all players the same way the whole game; "consistent pattern of worrying behaviour" = you have frequently done scummy things.) You may also notice that I said hypocrisy is notnecessarilya scumtell.
@Raddish 277:
1. It might; it has been a while. But I don't think so.
2. I have some ideas, but I won't know which are right until you're dead and I'm not going to voice them and incite sheep.
3. If I eventually read you as Town, I certainly wouldn't let you get lynched.
4. "Oh look, Wolf is being run up/maybe L-1/I'm also being run up/let's end this Day before it gets any more traction."
Never said I didn't. See above.
I can assure you that I am not, in fact, a moron.In post 279, SkiddishRaddish wrote:
But I mean, does it seem like to you that Goodmorning is legitimately looking for those possibilities?In post 260, platinum_fleece wrote: This post actually gave me a bit of insight on how you viewed goodmorning's actions towards you. To me, it feels like you're convinced from the first few posts she made about being suspicious of you that gm would always be reading you as if you were scum, instead of having the possibility that she might be trying to find reasons from you to change her mind.
You probably did [ spoiler ][ quote ][ / spoiler ][ / quote ].In post 283, kuror0 wrote:ok no freaking clue what happened or why it looks like that but i hope MOD can make the format right.
Breaks the whole damn page.
(Actually given the "wrote for ants" thing I think you just missed an end bracket on your open quote. LikeIn [url=the url wrote:post whatever[endurl], "Person" SHOULD BE END BRACKET HERE.)EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENTLA during normal working and sleeping hours EST
Get to know a very pleasant AM.-
-
boring Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: June 15, 2016
I should correct myself and say that that by "leave the hammer up to him", I mean let platinum hammer SR.In post 288, boring wrote:edit: I'm a little wary of kuror0's hesitation to make a vote. Unless I've totally misread, he thinks SR is scum, but he's not voted. It's not like putting her at L-1 will be a huge deal.
Actually, if we're all pretty sure platinum is town, it might be good to leave the hammer on our two wagons up to him.
I've been thinking more about the wagons. I've learned to be wary of D1 wagons because I've only seen scum lynched on D1 once. Every other time, it's been a scum-filled wagon on a weak townie. The fact that the SR wagon is lagging, and the MW one has become the strongest makes me doubt the MW one even more. They've both been low on my reads list, so I figured MW would be fine too, but I've changed my mind. I'm not ready to clear MW by any means, but I can't shake the nagging feeling that our scum team might be sitting pretty on his wagon.
Am I overthinking this? I'd like for someone else (preferably a few someones) to weigh in on this.-
-
goodmorning AnySurvivorAny
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10204
- Joined: October 15, 2012
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)
VCA is usually silly.
The lynch rate for Scum D1 in Newbies last time I checked was 18%, which is slightly below random but also not zero.EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENTLA during normal working and sleeping hours EST
Get to know a very pleasant AM.-
-
SkiddishRaddish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: August 17, 2016
I looked to see who voted me and I was shocked when I saw that Kurur0 wasn't one of them and hasn't casted his vote yet. It's like he's trying to put down an argument for people to vote for me, but then waiting to put down the hammer at the most opportune moment. Of course, he could be just waiting to get more opinions before he votes. (I'm guessing that this lack of activity is not normal to the forums.)In post 288, boring wrote:edit: I'm a little wary of kuror0's hesitation to make a vote. Unless I've totally misread, he thinks SR is scum, but he's not voted. It's not like putting her at L-1 will be a huge deal.
That's Platinum's decision. Don't hurt town by influencing their vote and depriving us of that information.In post 290, boring wrote: I should correct myself and say that that by "leave the hammer up to him", I mean let platinum hammer SR.
That's honestly fascinating. Has the forum done any statistics on this?In post 290, boring wrote: I've learned to be wary of D1 wagons because I've only seen scum lynched on D1 once. Every other time, it's been a scum-filled wagon on a weak townie.
Hardly lagging, I'm one vote down from Map Wolf, which was my vote that I cast last night. It's not like a full 24 hours past with no one else has voting or leaning towards my innocence.In post 290, boring wrote: The fact that the SR wagon is lagging, and the MW one has become the strongest makes me doubt the MW one even more.
You sure the scum team isn't sitting pretty on my wagon? Or hell, both wagons? Almost everyone has voted so they'll likely be on a wagon at the end of the gameday.In post 290, boring wrote: They've both been low on my reads list, so I figured MW would be fine too, but I've changed my mind. I'm not ready to clear MW by any means, but I can't shake the nagging feeling that our scum team might be sitting pretty on his wagon.
You’re going to start looking scummy if you keep posting about other stuff and ignoring @s towards you. And in addition to them, do you have other reasons for voting me (beyond what Kurur0 wrote that you quoted)?
Started working on a reply to the rest but it'll have to wait until probably later tonight when I'm done with homework.
p-edit: What's VCA?
So it's a little under a 1 in 5 chance. That makes sense with 9 players.-
-
SkiddishRaddish Goon
-
-
SkiddishRaddish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: August 17, 2016
That’s part of why I decided to start playing mafia on here. My personality day-to-day is much more feelings based and learning how to lean a little more on fact is good personal growth for someone like me. (In Myers-Briggs terms for those who know them, I'm an INFJ trying to better use my Ti function.)In post 287, boring wrote: Okay, I'm beginning to feel bad for you now. These HUGE leaps you're making are a sign of someone unaccustomed to rational problem-solving.
Explain where the leaps are. It's probably because I made the post but I'm not seeing them.
Well, I'm happy that my play is at least improving by the tiniest bit.In post 287, boring wrote: This little patch of crazy certainly isn't changing my read, but I can see that you're giving this a valiant try, and you should feel happy about that. I get the impression that you're struggling all alone, hoping against hope to make it through the day so you can confer with your partner.
Who do you think would have coached me on all of this?
I’ll quote Goodmorning on this “Effort is not indicative of aliment”.In post 287, boring wrote: My thoughts on kuror0 have improved considerably since he's started to contribute. I don't see why anyone would be putting so much effort into ISOs on Day 1. As a preference, those kinds of things are best left as personal notes for a later "day", to be used toward cases. But he's not the only one doing it, so meh, maybe I'm the odd one.
I'd like better reasoning if you could before the gameday closes.
I eventually figured it out, but I think this was the clearest definition I’ve read for it, so thank you.In post 287, boring wrote: Tunneling is pursuing your reads to the exclusion of all else. It's beyond case-making, and beyond confirmation bias. It's like you have tunnel-vision.-
-
kuror0 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: June 12, 2012
back with a terrible headache.
Why I don't have my vote on skiddish yet? That's simple I didn't want the day to end before it was necessary. Somewhere I said I was ready to vote for skiddish as in I'm convinced she is scum. why not vote right away, because I was going out and there was roughly 2 and a half days left letting my vote there could enable some hammer which I didn't want so soon and could happen while I was out(I wasn't expecting drunk me to come and post). Now due to all the lurkers/Vla we didn't got that much, but at least we got something.
With that said VOTE: SkiddishToo lazy to be scum.-
-
kuror0 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: June 12, 2012
-
-
Map Wolf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 585
- Joined: June 4, 2016
- Location: Denmark
Okay thank you for elaborating on it.In post 289, goodmorning wrote:
You say "I think his/her posts are good" a lot in that readslist. I want to know which posts you find good and why. You don't have to give a lot of examples, just one or two from each person.In post 268, Map Wolf wrote:
Specific on as to what?In post 253, goodmorning wrote:re: your readslist: can you be more specific?“The biggest defeat is to not lose”-MapWolf-
-
Map Wolf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 585
- Joined: June 4, 2016
- Location: Denmark
No. Your hypothetical scummate could be pretty much anyone, although more experienced players would be more likely to distance you.In post 271, SkiddishRaddish wrote: Who do you think is staying the furthest away from me then?“The biggest defeat is to not lose”-MapWolf-
-
boring Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: June 15, 2016
Assuming that I was saying you were coached. This requires a leap of logic that doesn't match up at all with what I said. It makes me think you've more information than me, and you don't know how to make the necessary adjustments.In post 294, SkiddishRaddish wrote:Explain where the leaps are. It's probably because I made the post but I'm not seeing them.
See above.In post 294, SkiddishRaddish wrote:
Well, I'm happy that my play is at least improving by the tiniest bit.In post 287, boring wrote: This little patch of crazy certainly isn't changing my read, but I can see that you're giving this a valiant try, and you should feel happy about that. I get the impression that you're struggling all alone, hoping against hope to make it through the day so you can confer with your partner.
Who do you think would have coached me on all of this?
I'm really not sure what you're asking for here.In post 294, SkiddishRaddish wrote:
I’ll quote Goodmorning on this “Effort is not indicative of aliment”.In post 287, boring wrote: My thoughts on kuror0 have improved considerably since he's started to contribute. I don't see why anyone would be putting so much effort into ISOs on Day 1. As a preference, those kinds of things are best left as personal notes for a later "day", to be used toward cases. But he's not the only one doing it, so meh, maybe I'm the odd one.
I'd like better reasoning if you could before the gameday closes.
Spoiler:
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-
-