I didn't make the promise to scum I made it explicitly because the neighborhood is safe from most kills so it's perfect for sorting to make a town pool. If you aren't sure about someone in the hood I suggest getting an invest to clear them.In post 2073, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:Look, fire what's your solution here? Lynching scum together or keeping a promise to scum? Unless klingon takes off, I don't see how we can do both.
Not from where I stand.In post 1817, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:Look, I'm open to the possibility of being wrong on creature and open to the possibility of being wrong.
So do I.In post 1832, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:Oh and for the record, I HATE fucking nullreads with a passion.
I'm going to ignore this until you give me reasons.In post 2074, mastin2 wrote:I'm a bit swamped today and maybe tomorrow, but come Monday? Sure I'll give you plenty. But for now:In post 1788, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:I would, but I haven't been given a single fucking reason why they are scum.That was a Reasonably Rational tell. Not a towntell. I'd argue it was even a scumtell.The reach out to me was totally fucking town.See my 660, 1481, and 1784 for my thoughts on that.Their role is town.Absolutely not! That's actually one of the problems with them!Their scumhunting is town.Not really, no.Their desire to see NC scum lynched seems legit.Your read on Creature is 100% wrong, so there.This wagon is jumped on by Creature, who by the fucking way is scum.
This IS Reasonably Rational as scum.
This is an acceptable wagon.
So you will willingly give scum a gun? Fuck off fire. This is why I cannot trust you.In post 2081, Firebringer wrote:Willing to give a gun to anyone who will shoot titus n1
I prefer to fuck on.In post 2083, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:So you will willingly give scum a gun? Fuck off fire. This is why I cannot trust you.In post 2081, Firebringer wrote:Willing to give a gun to anyone who will shoot titus n1
farside, Yume, myself, you, and almost will all do Cakey. Let's do that rather than argue over your read.In post 2082, mastin2 wrote:This is an acceptable wagon.
Basically, the lynches that I'd want today are SirCakez (highest), RR (second), Klingoncelt (third), Cooldog (fourth), Xkfyu (last I'd desire), or as a last resort, Not Chara.
So, not my first preference.
But definitely lynchable if we can't get majority on better options.
Scum lynches are scum lynches, so as long as it's one of the above being wagoned, we're mostly good. (Mostly, in that one will flip town.)
When we have half the same scum pool but you won't vote Cakey. Come on. You are the one unwilling to vote scum.In post 2087, Firebringer wrote:If you were a captain of a ship at this point I would rally a mutiny on the grounds of you trying to sink the boat
Well I wasn't gonna bring this up until later, buuuuuuuuuut...you're completely and entirely right here about SirCakez being scum with his intervention.In post 1871, grapes wrote:This is why cakes is scum ftr. He's quick to write this off as tvt without giving a deeper understanding of what exactly is going on here and our takes on what happened in the hood aren't very similar at all. They're different because what chara said went down isn't what went down because its scum.
In other words. His logic is "okay these two guys both developed opportunistic scumreads on each other out of nowhere and are both twisting what was said in a hood to make the other person look bad. Feels town on town."
One, my scumread devolved on chara far earlier. Two, that doesn't make any sense.
You give the gun to RR. Just for the poetic justice.In post 2092, Firebringer wrote:Okay titus I'll make you a deal. I will follow you on anyone fucking wagon you want for the day on this condition.
If you are wrong, which I am 100% you are. You got shot by the person I give a gun too.
Sound fair?
grapes is town no matter what, period.In post 1874, Not Chara wrote:grapes might not be scum. if Cakez is scum, grapes is town. and Cakez called our argument TvT because he knew that's what it was. would also be the reason for his defense of me, when otherwise i'm an incredibly safe wagon for scum to choose.
I mean DGB there my bad. Rr cannot shoot tonight if you give him the gun tonight. Plus they might not do it.In post 2093, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:You give the gun to RR. Just for the poetic justice.In post 2092, Firebringer wrote:Okay titus I'll make you a deal. I will follow you on anyone fucking wagon you want for the day on this condition.
If you are wrong, which I am 100% you are. You got shot by the person I give a gun too.
Sound fair?
And I will go for that.
Now you want me to give a gun to my scum read?In post 2093, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:You give the gun to RR. Just for the poetic justice.In post 2092, Firebringer wrote:Okay titus I'll make you a deal. I will follow you on anyone fucking wagon you want for the day on this condition.
If you are wrong, which I am 100% you are. You got shot by the person I give a gun too.
Sound fair?
And I will go for that.
Didn't think it through. See my next post.In post 2096, Firebringer wrote:Now you want me to give a gun to my scum read?In post 2093, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:You give the gun to RR. Just for the poetic justice.In post 2092, Firebringer wrote:Okay titus I'll make you a deal. I will follow you on anyone fucking wagon you want for the day on this condition.
If you are wrong, which I am 100% you are. You got shot by the person I give a gun too.
Sound fair?
And I will go for that.
i'm, at the moment, toying with the idea of SirCakez being scum because of his defense of me.In post 2094, mastin2 wrote:grapes is town no matter what, period.In post 1874, Not Chara wrote:grapes might not be scum. if Cakez is scum, grapes is town. and Cakez called our argument TvT because he knew that's what it was. would also be the reason for his defense of me, when otherwise i'm an incredibly safe wagon for scum to choose.
You being town is the only thing in question, HOWEVER, regardless of whether you are or aren't town, SirCakez is definitely scum.
V never gives confirmation of single-ball, but I'll eat three eggs in one bite if this game turns up multiball.In post 1881, Almost50 wrote:Question: How sure are we that this is single-ball?