What i dont like is weak lynches. When half the players are LURKERS.In post 707, Wisdom wrote:i dont like how theres yet another counterwagon attempt on creature
I can get on with a lurker lynch.
But it was stated Creature was in a few games as well as i'd assume having a life?
This lynch attempt was piss poor and i say that having just replaced in myself.
Ditto.In post 731, Gamma Emerald wrote:Kraska, I think the same of your substanceless "x is town" posts.
There were promises of content.In post 734, kraska77 wrote:How is typing out my reads substanceless when it gives people an idea of where my heads at?In post 731, Gamma Emerald wrote:Kraska, I think the same of your substanceless "x is town" posts.
There was NO SUBSTANCE TO THAT CONTENT.
And your refusal to Gamma to elaborate 736 is further proof of that.
Its stuff like the above that really make me question my read on you every few pages.In post 741, I Am Innocent wrote:Why is the RM wagon still only at 1?
Rm why are you posting in other games yesterday but getting prodded here?
Why haven't you voted yet?
Why are you so bad at scum?
Nero wagon is dumb. Ank is prob scum too.
Creature/Spynik opinion please.
Great its on 751!
#Disgust. RM is a moot point. It's like a break up. Get over it and under something else.
Re:IAI. Flawless reasoning.In post 762, Wisdom wrote:why would scum RM mention he doesnt like you if he doesnt want to go toe to toe with you?
Bad, bad logic. You dont lynch slots that have just been replaced. You've just remade my shitlist. Fab!In post 774, I Am Innocent wrote:Lurker votes = large wagons = pressure = forces lurkers to participate = better chance of getting a read on them = goodIn post 773, Sondam wrote:STOP THE LURKER VOTES THIS SHOULD BE COMMON SENSE YOU DON'T LYNCH LURKERSIn post 685, Synik wrote:Hello.
~M
So why u yelling Maria?
Im being smothered with all the posting but whatever. I seen Gamma agreed with me and i stick by that.
This.In post 777, Sondam wrote:Don't ever vote lurkers people who replaced in even more give people time to catch up it's really rude not to
~M
And this.In post 780, Sondam wrote:Why would you want to rush people on reads when they can be half assed because of said rush? ~MIn post 779, I Am Innocent wrote:In post 777, Sondam wrote:Don't ever vote lurkers people who replaced in even more give people time to catch up it's really rude not to
~M
Change the word vote to lynch and I agree with u. Nothing like a little pressure to motivate someone to catch up quicker.
THATSIn post 782, iraonavp wrote:I agree, same.In post 699, Nero Cain wrote:I am lynching you two when Creature flips scum.
And actually gives me substantial reason to keep you in the shitlist.
Side order of reasons please?In post 785, Mewtaph wrote:I actually agree
In post 787, Nero Cain wrote:In post 406, Nero Cain wrote:I also kinda dislike Gamma's post about leaving Cakes alone till day 3ok lets stop pretending you are paying any attention to this game b/c you clearly aren't.In post 640, Nero Cain wrote:his thing about how Cakes is always scummy and we should wait till d3 to read him seems like something scum might say to defend a town.In post 638, Wisdom wrote:but how are you scumreading Gamma?
but yes, hoping on my wagon with shit all reasoning and then hopping off after being so sure I was scum is p shady.
Are you ACTUALLY lining up lynches? LMFAO.In post 789, Nero Cain wrote:Ank, if the Creature slot flips scum tell me why I shouldn't string you from the tallest tree?
EXPLAIN. PLEASE. RIVET ME ON THIS NERO.could see mew as town if Synik is scum and I just generally view the Synik voters as town.
Dont worry if you forget, ill requote it repetitively if you do.
You'd already had that chat with Wisdom about voting on lurkers/inactive slots.In post 801, Nero Cain wrote:Why didn't you explain? What is your reasoning? Why did your scum read on RM become so much stronger than your scumread on me?In post 795, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn't explain my vote on you, but I did have reasoning
I will admit that I didn't realize Creature replaced out until Creature was replaced so congratulations on pointing out that I'm more interested in finding scum than noticing NAI events.
You left with the "replacement better explain that" mentality. *Headcock*
And failed to vote a lurker who was then later replaced. Only when he was replaced did you vote.
No. Its not. This was not a lurker lynch.In post 820, Nero Cain wrote:Great idea Basic, I should have left my vote on Ooba and continued to vote a vanity wagon when I can vote a scum that has a chance of getting lynched. This whole "don't vote empty slots, don't vote lurkers" is like the silliest thing ever.
I cant remember if it ever was. In which case - so much scum.
There were already5 or so votes on that slot.
Lurker!scum know what the story is.
You were piling on votes on someone who'd just replaced in and encouraged others to do likewise.
Neither giving the replacement time to catch up nor form any reads and it's pressure they do not need when undertaking a read.
It results in sloppy work.
And you've been here since o9. This really shouldnt need explaining to you.
There were legit reasons to vote Ooba imo too. So riddle me this.
What made the Synik one more appealing?
Cause all im thinking you seen was: more votes.
Your pressure theory was already in practice once the replacement came in and can fly out the damn window.
Cause lets face it. If Sondam and Gamma hadnt had stopped that wagon then, that was an easy lynch for scum.
What you done was opportunistic, unnecesary and inconsiderate. Deal with it rather than trying to dodge it and twist my words.
Do i smell distancing? I cant be sure yet.In post 824, iraonavp wrote:Pressure voting is useless and you're just trying to do it to get attention.
Can we not do this right now Ank? Im in the middle of a tirade and all - and its just awkward to try to break it up with reasonable thought.In post 825, Ankamius wrote:What do you mean by this, exactly?In post 816, Basic wrote:572 has me on the fence.
Think of whatever it was as im not sure how i felt about this one. I can read back after and let you know then if it was anything important? But im sure i would have stated it if it was.
Again, twisting words.In post 833, Nero Cain wrote:This game feels p much like http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=67600 where I was pushing a known lurker to get a reaction out of them and scum PEP argued that I tried toLYNCHthem. Its basically the same argument that Basic is making. While I know they are different players the similarity of their arguments seem more scum motivated than town.
But I dont care for your meta. It is less than useless to me, for you to tell me, what someone else done to you, refers to what i am doing here.
Its not the lurker lynch im opposed to. Ive stated i have one Policy/Lurker lynch max per game rule.
I have the "Someones just replaced in and should post their thoughts." mentality in case we're both town.
What if they find something i missed?
So again dont twist my words. It doesnt help my perception of you.
Explain to me why the Ooba/Snarky was a vanity wagon please?
@Gamma. Christ this tirade thing is not just gonna happen for me is it?
1.I know that. The RVS vote was a joke and this was my response to it. A joke.
2.Ok.
3.I dont know when it happened tbh but i started townreading you at about 400.
4.Lol. Again as i said the post was like a diary. It wasnt meant to be insulting.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
5.IAI was probably the person my read bounced on a lot. At times he seemed quite pro town, interested and inquizitive. I found his thoughts on RM ok. But its degraded into unnecessary tunneling and then the added vote on Spynik/Creature.
6. I havent liked her lately, yet she started off very townie. Ill probably look over the reads.
7. IDK. He's not the highest on my scumlist, apparently he's hard to read anyway so im okay with him today at least and depending with NKs and everything it may not even matter.
@Snarky. Why? And Im hoping theres more to focus on than just Nero.
Ill probably reread again at some point to go over things. But not loving this.
Not loving this at all.