"The great William Dewey didn't struggle! He was good at everything on the first try! Just like me when I wrote this play! Not a single word needs to be changed!"
-Mayor Dewey,Historical Friction
Deadline
Xkfyu is V/LA until 9/26/2016
"The great William Dewey didn't struggle! He was good at everything on the first try! Just like me when I wrote this play! Not a single word needs to be changed!"
-Mayor Dewey,Historical Friction
Understandable, but I'd prefer you not do this.
(Speaking of Loopdan-like players......*)In post 5487, Shadow_step wrote:On page 42 currently. I'm onto some things but don't expect anything spectacular till tomorrow evening at least. My main focus currently is the development of the SC wagon. In Varsoon's last game we lynched scum day 1 too. But that didn't end up well. IIRC more than half the scum team was on that wagon.
In post 5629, mastin2 wrote:(Speaking of Loopdan-like players......*)In post 5487, Shadow_step wrote:On page 42 currently. I'm onto some things but don't expect anything spectacular till tomorrow evening at least. My main focus currently is the development of the SC wagon. In Varsoon's last game we lynched scum day 1 too. But that didn't end up well. IIRC more than half the scum team was on that wagon.
(*I mean, he's less likely to be scum since his slot doesn'tquitefit the pattern as well,butstill......**)
(**Also this would be a scumteam that would be comprised almost entirely of lurkers or former-lurkers when factoring in Mathblade's slot, so......)
No, it's not. The terms aren't synonyms. They have alignment connotations to them for good reason. I agree with you that Mathblade was doubtcasting: doubtcasting being the act of throwing shade onto a town player to try and make players doubt them. This is not an effort to scumhunt. It is an attempt to slander a player, essentially, and try to subtly widen the gap between the town, attempt to break apart a strong townbloc, and sew seeds of discord.In post 5518, Not Chara wrote:should i have said their 'paranoia surrounding you' was townie? casting doubt on conftown is the same as being suspicious of conftown.
That's the smart play, yes. I'd do it. And I know Mathblade would too. I have a fairly decent psychological profile on them. Notably, so too does Titus, given, you know.In post 5525, Not Chara wrote:do you think desperate scum Mathblade would still attempt to play the long game by going after conftown/obvtown? when they're about to be lynched?
I do agree with you here.i think you should drop the point about their role.
is this townIn post 5638, Creature wrote:Titus
Skybird
Almost50
Farside22
Yume
grapes
mastin2
Not Chara
Kraskaeaque (kraska77 + lyncanfire)
killthestory
McMenno
Firebringer
Excuse me while I am choking on your bullshit and policy lynch players.In post 5636, Titus wrote:Mastina catching up. She will see your post.
I do not have a town read. Every other rational townie, meant all the rational town but me.
Pretty much, yeah. For obvious reasons, no details, but I can more or less confirm that this is along the lines of accurate.In post 5528, Almost50 wrote:I think the reason was FB was going to give a vig shot to someone they scum read and/or the target of the gift openly announced their target whom the "bubbler" was town reading. (Ex: Shiro said they'd shoot me, farside would vig Titus I think.. etc). The Gem also either wasn't too sure of FB's alignment or wasn't town read by him (thus could not actually "dictate" his action to him).
So, what was the best course of action? Isolate him. Prevent him from gifting out something potentially harmful to town, even if it was at the cost of either killing or vanilaizing him. Something lead them to believe he was town (could be a reread or a night action) so they opted not to kill him.
Admittedly I also have that feeling, but nonetheless it's not an accusation we should make even if it turned out to be true, because it's pretty shitty to accuse the player of using a real-life reason as justification for replacing out. (In short, even if it turns out that Loopdan used a real-life reason to justify replacing out as scum...not an accusation we want to make.)In post 5533, Creature wrote:MathBlade, I don't know why, but I get a feeling Loopdan replaced out because he got scum (as his town self is usually more active).
It we boring and sad cause you weren't there to cheer me onIn post 5439, Shiro wrote:Fire. What was your prison like?
So town vanilized me because they thought I was scum giving a gun to other scum? Like what? How the fuck does that make sense.In post 5643, mastin2 wrote:Pretty much, yeah. For obvious reasons, no details, but I can more or less confirm that this is along the lines of accurate.In post 5528, Almost50 wrote:I think the reason was FB was going to give a vig shot to someone they scum read and/or the target of the gift openly announced their target whom the "bubbler" was town reading. (Ex: Shiro said they'd shoot me, farside would vig Titus I think.. etc). The Gem also either wasn't too sure of FB's alignment or wasn't town read by him (thus could not actually "dictate" his action to him).
So, what was the best course of action? Isolate him. Prevent him from gifting out something potentially harmful to town, even if it was at the cost of either killing or vanilaizing him. Something lead them to believe he was town (could be a reread or a night action) so they opted not to kill him.
Admittedly I also have that feeling, but nonetheless it's not an accusation we should make even if it turned out to be true, because it's pretty shitty to accuse the player of using a real-life reason as justification for replacing out. (In short, even if it turns out that Loopdan used a real-life reason to justify replacing out as scum...not an accusation we want to make.)In post 5533, Creature wrote:MathBlade, I don't know why, but I get a feeling Loopdan replaced out because he got scum (as his town self is usually more active).
And, need I remind you: this is an excuse that has lasted acrossIn post 5538, Titus wrote:Right now, I hear excuse after excuse about how you'll come after town at every opportunity.
In post 5640, MathBlade wrote:No Mastina.
Titus tunnels me almost every game we are in. She believes she has caught me every time except when she is scum. She is terribad at reading me.
The TLDR of that is you are policy lynching me if town and scared I will tunnel Titus if scum. You are scared of what I did in Gistou same as almost50 who wait for it. Advocates for a policy lynch.
I am flattered but Mastina doesn't ignore posts and Mastina shouldn't policy lynch.
I am town. Shiro is the scum fuck you want to lynch.