i ended up looking through Charloux to see what caused me to put a townread there.
i didn't find anything. and the lack of followup on my answer about McMenno doesn't look great either.
their readslist is fine reads wise, i'm not sure about the reasoning.
remind me who else said they were townreading Charloux?
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."
In post 608, Not Chara wrote:you knowing that you've done so before doesn't make it look any better. it just means you did it knowing you had the means to defend yourself.
talk to me about your read on me.
True, but it also doesn't mean I am scummy either.
My read on you is mostly from your previous incarnate but some from you trying to get a foothold into this game by making up fake reads.
In post 601, Not Chara wrote:i ended up looking through Charloux to see what caused me to put a townread there.
i didn't find anything. and the lack of followup on my answer about McMenno doesn't look great either.
their readslist is fine reads wise, i'm not sure about the reasoning.
remind me who else said they were townreading Charloux?
Off the top of my head mcmenno and bnl. Farside I think said some things that I assumed she had a town read. But that might have just been her being a "davsto was killed cause town"-y
In post 599, lane0168 wrote:Can we get into why people think Charloux is town?
Me.
That's like a green behind the ears derpy town.
Also I don't think the blow up was necessary lane.
I'd thought you would have learned to be more rational after poker mafia.
The issue I had is you defended the spot. Ergo you are town reading the spot.
That's not hard to understand at all.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
In post 607, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:I am really not scum, pretty sure you are though.
Me knowing he would flip town doesn't really mean much besides I was right.
I have compromised voted many times before, I even said I would get called scum for it.
Its kind of a silly pattern.
Hell I think lane here has called me scum before hammering a townread when I said i was doing it to compromise.
In post 608, Not Chara wrote:you knowing that you've done so before doesn't make it look any better. it just means you did it knowing you had the means to defend yourself.
talk to me about your read on me.
True, but it also doesn't mean I am scummy either.
My read on you is mostly from your previous incarnate but some from you trying to get a foothold into this game by making up fake reads.
Ewwww
Fos mohis
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
527 same thought process as me 532 read reavaluation and elaborate explaination
Also the joke in 520 is town
Your scumread on Charloux seems to be predicated on Dark/Chara being set-up as a mislynch, but your townread on that slot has diminished. How does that affect your read on Charloux?
In post 601, Not Chara wrote:i ended up looking through Charloux to see what caused me to put a townread there.
i didn't find anything. and the lack of followup on my answer about McMenno doesn't look great either.
their readslist is fine reads wise, i'm not sure about the reasoning.
remind me who else said they were townreading Charloux?
Why do you read people based on their reads (and not just the reasoning the reasoning behind those reads only)?
527 same thought process as me 532 read reavaluation and elaborate explaination
Also the joke in 520 is town
Your scumread on Charloux seems to be predicated on Dark/Chara being set-up as a mislynch, but your townread on that slot has diminished. How does that affect your read on Charloux?
In post 599, lane0168 wrote:Can we get into why people think Charloux is town?
Me.
That's like a green behind the ears derpy town.
Also I don't think the blow up was necessary lane.
I'd thought you would have learned to be more rational after poker mafia.
The issue I had is you defended the spot. Ergo you are town reading the spot.
That's not hard to understand at all.
Is that different than his scum game?
I was very rational. I'd thought you would have learned that when I'm asked a question, I answer it. If you ask again, I'll answer the same way, because the first time was the actual answer. If you ask again I'll get pissed cause it's ridiculous
The issue is I answered your questions, again, and you keep asking, again.
In post 601, Not Chara wrote:i ended up looking through Charloux to see what caused me to put a townread there.
i didn't find anything. and the lack of followup on my answer about McMenno doesn't look great either.
their readslist is fine reads wise, i'm not sure about the reasoning.
remind me who else said they were townreading Charloux?
Why do you read people based on their reads (and not just the reasoning the reasoning behind those reads only)?
that's a strange question. who said i was reading Charloux based on what their reads were? all i said was that there weren't any glaring issues with the reads themselves.
the reasoning is what i noted as disliking.
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."