Death Note Mafia (Game Over!)

[Wisdom]

VOTE: snarky

3 days left, we have to agree on a wagon

[Mewtaph]

I am ignoring Almost Chara because she isn't coasting on her vote on me and seems to be actively adjusting her read quite naturally in a way I see as town.
Why I believe that at least 1 of the 2 following players on my wagon are usually scum aligned based on how they got to their vote and read, why they are still voting me, and what they've done to solidify their read (if anything):

Cakez:

Spoiler:

His behaviours when it comes to reading my slot comes off as very unnatural and rigid. Comes off as tentative, and not in a good way.

498: Says that I'm dropping newb tells that is

nothing scummy

. (My posts when I first started posting were one liners as well.)
883: Agrees with kraska that I am posting one liners. He can't remember one post I've made thus far. Slight alarm bells, basically is saying that he would be willing to vote/scumread me based on the lack of content even though he said that they are just newb tells that are nothing scummy earlier.
1528: Declares informal "intent to vote". If you want to sheep Wisdom and kraska just do it instead of posting over multiple posts for some reason. Also, trying to fish flavour when there were only about 4 votes on me. Alarm bells...
1628: Ignores what I've posted entirely and votes me based on the basis that my vote was opportunistic and disgusting. Cakez: I looked at the way you pushed on Ank and it didn't look very good at all. What's wrong with voting what I see as scummy... seems like the vote is only disgusting because I'm voting you...
1737: Says that I am discrediting him. Asks a question that isn't alignment indicative, and in general still isn't trying to align his read by addressing me directly with more revealing questions and inquiries. If you are serious voting and your reasoning is "your vote is disgusting and opportunistic", I am a bit worried.

Jason:

Spoiler:

Overall he seems to be riding on his Iraon meta townread, his scumread on me, and his scumread on Ooba/Snarky's slot with like no progression other than repeating the same things he said in 440 whenever he does decide to mention these players. He seems to be going along with the flow of the game. Here are my main observations:

457: Vote post. Comes off as a bit too defensive for my tastes, but seemed ok to me at the time.
484: Denies conversation. Says that he'd rather direct the conversation elsewhere, doesn't present a new topic to talk about. His subsequent posts talk about Hark saying that a black notebook fall from the sky. Right, so that was the topic I should have talked about.
887: Reaffirms that he thinks I am scum. Posts a read list and takes very obvious town reads. Places the lurkers and a handful of active posters that he underlines to cover up his ass later. in the null area. Snarky is generally lurking, so that's an easy scumread. I mean, it doesn't look too great if you only have two scum reads.
1581: It should be him trying to discern whether he's wasting his vote on what was basically a vanity vote that he hasn't explained/elaborated on for 1000+ posts from a town POV, not me trying to change his mind on his scum read. Not feeling very good about this snarky response.

I'm still unsure as of why players are voting Nero, so I will need someone to direct me to reasons why or I will probably not vote him today because of my previous townread on him.
P-edit: Ok fine. VOTE: SnarkySnowman

[Wisdom]

Nero is the usual scum that only I understand they are scum and they end up winning the game for scum unless they're caught by night actions
There is one every game

[Mewtaph]

Okay.

[kraska77]

A snarky lynch wouldn't tell us much tho...
How about Jason
VOTE: jason

[Wisdom]

I prefer Jason to snarky but I dont think it has as much support

[Gamma Emerald]

I'll re-ISO Jason, see what I can find.

[Gamma Emerald]

I don't really see anything to indicate Jason's alignment, but his posting feels scummy. It feels like he's just like "here's 2 or 3 posts, see you in 24 hours". Basically, while his content does not feel scummy, his posting does.
VOTE: JasonWazza

[Mewtaph]

Yes plz
VOTE: Jason

[Wisdom]

VOTE: jason

[Nero Cain]

vote:Jason

[KuroiXHF]

Vote Count 1.22

Not_Mafia

(0/11)

-

Sondam

(0/11)

-

Randomidget

(1/11)

- Sondam

Harkonnen97

(0/11)

-

JasonWazza

(6/11)

- I Am Innocent, Kraska77, Gamma Emerald, Mewtaph, Wisdom, Nero Cain

Basic

(0/11)

-

Synik

(2/11)

- Narna, Not_Mafia

BROseidon

(0/11)

-

Ankamius

(0/11)

-

Kraska77

(0/11)

-

Wisdom

(0/11)

-

Iraonavp

(0/11)

-

SirCakez

(2/11)

- Ankamius, Iraonavp

Narna

(0/11)

-

I Am Innocent

(1/11)

- Randomidget

Nero Cain

(0/11)

-

Almost Chara

(1/11)

- Basic

Gamma Emerald

(0/11)

-

SnarkySnowman

(3/11)

- BROseidon, Vecna, Harkonnen97

Vecna

(0/11)

-

Mewtaph

(3/11)

- JasonWazza, Almost Chara, SirCakez

Not Voting:

SnarkySnowman, Synik
(expired on 2016-09-29 10:30:00)

Notes

- Sondam is V/LA until 9/26

"Humans are truly disgusting creatures."

[Harkonnen97]

VOTE: Jason

[Harkonnen97]

choo-choo

[Randomnamechange]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: jason

[Nero Cain]

:/

[Synik]

@Synik:

You know, this attitude would've earned you some scum points if you didn't claim already. If your claim is legit, please try to work with town for as short as you may stay alive.

P.S. I can understand the frustration of a PR being forced to claim on D1 and thus practically being sentenced to death at night. I can also sympathize that it had more to do with a meta read on your predecessor rather than your own play. However, the right thing to do now is to give your utmost sincere effort to help us lynch scum. And who knows? Maybe even the SK themselves and you are granted a chance to live longer. What do you say?

~A50

P-edit:

Thank GOD I can post with my main in the PT. The next time I hydra I will make sure I only play in that one particular game and not even use FireFox to login to MS.

Wouldn't it just be easier for him to stop asking me stupid questions though?

[Sondam]

VOTE: Snarky
~M

[Synik]

We're lynching Jason over Snarky?

Is this real life?

[Synik]

Vote: SnarkySnowman

[Sondam]

Time to some up snarky:
"Vote this person now!"
*Snarky says as he isn't voting says person."
~M

[Sondam]

Let's string up snarky Nero RM and Mew for that flash wagon on Jason thanks.

Gamm and Wisdom you both disappoint me

[Gamma Emerald]

Let's string up snarky Nero RM and Mew for that flash wagon on Jason thanks.

Gamm and Wisdom you both disappoint me

What makes you think a Snarky wagon is any better? He hasn't really interacted with anyone, so it won't tell us much about what his buddies could be if he's scum.

[Sondam]

Let's string up snarky Nero RM and Mew for that flash wagon on Jason thanks.

Gamm and Wisdom you both disappoint me

What makes you think a Snarky wagon is any better? He hasn't really interacted with anyone, so it won't tell us much about what his buddies could be if he's scum.

Be a good little Gamma and sheep me so we can lynch the scum hm?

[Gamma Emerald]

Let's string up snarky Nero RM and Mew for that flash wagon on Jason thanks.

Gamm and Wisdom you both disappoint me

What makes you think a Snarky wagon is any better? He hasn't really interacted with anyone, so it won't tell us much about what his buddies could be if he's scum.

Be a good little Gamma and sheep me so we can lynch the scum hm?

First tell me who you think could be his buddies. I want good solid reasons.