Mini 1834: Biker Wars: Blood in the Streets (Game over!)

[farside22]

I can see how from a 3rd person POV who is unsure of my alignment you would read it that way, though. Good posting, looking for contradictions.

Still not sure if you were just trying to bait someone who you know is town or not, though, but now that I see you were actually getting somewhere with your questions, I like you a little better.

Actually parama cherry picked 2 post and dint care about the in between.
488 post happened because the question Parama asked was intended to give cakez town and how you feel.
All the questions he asked before that had nothing to do with any issues he had prior.

[Parama]

496 comes off as maybe a little survivalist but on the whole i guess i'm satisfied with that answer.

@farside: here's something productive that you can answer any way you want. there are a few players who haven't been discussed very much at all; kraska, Rach, and UT come to mind the most. do you have any opinion or read on these three right now?

[farside22]

Hey parama: I'm still waiting for you to explain the point of these questions.

fence sitting
or you know, it was absolutely in earnest ???

>not questioning it
???????

Ut: town lean
Kraska town
Rach: null

[eagerSnake]

496 comes off as maybe a little survivalist but on the whole i guess i'm satisfied with that answer.

yes I am trying to out-survive the scum, while keeping the game-state in positions where I won't be mis-lynched in a lylo situation and lose the game for all of us due to a D1 tunnel that I could've prevented by lynching the tunneler D1 who is either A) misreading me or B) scum, how dare me.

sorry if that's hard to comprehend.

[farside22]

you said he could either be scum or bad-town. do you deny this?
you said that if he was town it would not be a loss for the town to lynch him. do you deny this?
you said you'd be fine with lynching him. do you deny this?

in this specific post, you did not lean one way or the other on whether he's scum or town.
using your own bit here: how confident are you that he's scum?

Looks more pointless questions.^

[eagerSnake]

He was actually going somewhere with those questions, farside, sorry.

He was trying to point out a flaw in a comparison of 2 of my posts, but the problem with the flaw was it was perspective, from my POV there wasn't a flaw and I explained to him why

[farside22]

He was actually going somewhere with those questions, farside, sorry.

He was trying to point out a flaw in a comparison of 2 of my posts, but the problem with the flaw was it was perspective, from my POV there wasn't a flaw and I explained to him why

The second post he quoted was after you responded to his questions.

[Parama]

fence sitting
or you know, it was absolutely in earnest ???

>not questioning it
???????

first one was arguing against your argument. you claimed i was fence-sitting. i legitimately did not know if it was one or the other. that's not fence-sitting. it's earnest.
second one was not understanding what you meant. i still don't.

wanna answer my question now?

Hey parama: I'm still waiting for you to explain the point of these questions.

pedit: so questions only matter now if they're alignment-indicative.
how do you define that?

where
did
you
answer
this
question

point to it.
right this instant.

the worst part is that
1. you refuse to answer it
2. you claimed you'd already answered it, but refuse to point to where you did
3. you instead opted to question the importance of the question instead of, you know, just taking the time to answer it, even though you'd supposedly already answered it

meanwhile i'm over here having to build a freaking pyramid of this one question just because someone is continuing to be a massive hypocrite. i actually think this question is really important because without answering it you can continue to be vague about what is or isn't alignment indicative and thus what is or isn't important to you. i'm forcing you to take a stance, and you're outright refusing to do so. do you understand why i care about this question so much now? do you see how it is important?

[eagerSnake]

Farside-

If he was scum, a flaw like that he could've totally blown up. + town point to Parama

[farside22]

Parama pointless questions were on post 472
The post he was pointing out snakes flaw was post 488.
Get it?

[eagerSnake]

He wanted me to confirm my stance.

[farside22]

This is for Parama
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p8367978
Who just didn't like my response, when I made it at the time.

[eagerSnake]

Farside answer this question: How do you define what questions are alignment indicative?

[Parama]

yes, you literally asked how my question about what "alignment-indicative" is to you... is alignment indicative.

which is not an answer. it's a freaking circular answer that begs its own bloody question.

[farside22]

1. but in the (10%) scenario where he's just badtown, would you be fine with lynching him?

Is this a real question? I obviously would be hurt if he flipped town, as that bring scum closer to their win-con and me further from mine. Did you really expect a different answer here?

He is leading you to the question.

It's a trap question that he asked.
Frankly no townie worth there salt ever responds the same exact way depending on the question.

[eagerSnake]

Farside answer this question: How do you define what questions are alignment indicative?

[farside22]

Farside answer this question: How do you define what questions are alignment indicative?

A question that gets a view to see how a player thinks about post.
Not a question that is implying a players reads a fake a wrapping it up as a question.

[farside22]

Farside answer this question: How do you define what questions are alignment indicative?

A question that gets a view to see how a player thinks about post.
Not a question that is implying a players reads are fake a wrapping it up as a question.

Fixed

[farside22]

Like this question.

fence sitting
or you know, it was absolutely in earnest ???

[farside22]

Mod: fix quote please

[Parama]

let me reword that question without changing the meaning at all:
why did you think that was intentional fence-sitting instead of earnest confusion?

^this is asking how you think about a specific post.

[eagerSnake]

I'm so fucking glad I'm town this game or I'd be scared shitless right now

[eagerSnake]

VOTE: Farside22

[Parama]

while i'm thinking about it:
farside, why did you only answer the question after eager asked it?
what about him asking it suddenly made it alignment-indicative to you? that's your criteria for answering a question, in your own words; any other question isn't important. you previously said the question wasn't alignment indicative. so why did you answer it now, all of the sudden?

[farside22]

eagersnake's posting comes off really stiff tbh. I can't tell if the "reasoning" in 7 is serious or a joke and the "oh noes" just feels rlly forced

Your post reads more as a scum lean using words like post feeling forced and stiff.
I don't see confusion with that in the implied sentence.