STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6400 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:27 pm

In post 6399, Titus wrote:
In post 6397, kraskaesque wrote:If I take chara and far at their word, they're conftown
How so?

Let's end this line of discussion.

Remember, you wanted to stick to the order.

Thoughts on maths wagon Titus?

-Cerb

Not Chara · Post Post #6401 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:29 pm

In post 6395, Reasonably Rational wrote:@NC: what are you basing the DGB read off of exactly? I know there are some things, I've brought them up myself, but I'd like to hear your reasoning.

-Cerb

i've spoken about her a bit. granted, not very much.
when i last ISOed her, i literally found no town evidence. the only scumhunting-ish behaviour is when she brings up lurkers promising to catch up (Cooldog) or Seraphim saying he was busy and would catch up the next day. and that isn't counting her behaviour in the topic with Klingon, because it's her in-thread behaviour that concerns me.
in between her reads posts, most of her content is ignoring major game events in favour of fluff responses. which aren't bad in and of themselves, but it's like she isn't concerned with engaging the thread at all.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6402 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:31 pm

In post 6401, Not Chara wrote:
In post 6395, Reasonably Rational wrote:@NC: what are you basing the DGB read off of exactly? I know there are some things, I've brought them up myself, but I'd like to hear your reasoning.

-Cerb
i've spoken about her a bit. granted, not very much.
when i last ISOed her, i literally found no town evidence. the only scumhunting-ish behaviour is when she brings up lurkers promising to catch up (Cooldog) or Seraphim saying he was busy and would catch up the next day. and that isn't counting her behaviour in the topic with Klingon, because it's her in-thread behaviour that concerns me.
in between her reads posts, most of her content is ignoring major game events in favour of fluff responses. which aren't bad in and of themselves, but it's like she isn't concerned with engaging the thread at all.

All NAI for her, in my experience. I bitched on like D1 about her noncontribution in every game I've ever played with her.

Anything else?

-Cerb

Titus · Post Post #6403 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:31 pm

In post 6400, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 6399, Titus wrote:
In post 6397, kraskaesque wrote:If I take chara and far at their word, they're conftown
How so?
Let's end this line of discussion.

Remember, you wanted to stick to the order.

Thoughts on maths wagon Titus?

-Cerb

Math was spouting nonsense and I am not surprised at their wagon at all. I am holding back my own personal opinions because I do not wish to be sheeped at the moment or inadvertently suggest who I checked last night.

Not Chara · Post Post #6404 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:33 pm

In post 6402, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 6401, Not Chara wrote:
In post 6395, Reasonably Rational wrote:@NC: what are you basing the DGB read off of exactly? I know there are some things, I've brought them up myself, but I'd like to hear your reasoning.

-Cerb
i've spoken about her a bit. granted, not very much.
when i last ISOed her, i literally found no town evidence. the only scumhunting-ish behaviour is when she brings up lurkers promising to catch up (Cooldog) or Seraphim saying he was busy and would catch up the next day. and that isn't counting her behaviour in the topic with Klingon, because it's her in-thread behaviour that concerns me.
in between her reads posts, most of her content is ignoring major game events in favour of fluff responses. which aren't bad in and of themselves, but it's like she isn't concerned with engaging the thread at all.
All NAI for her, in my experience. I bitched on like D1 about her noncontribution in every game I've ever played with her.

Anything else?

-Cerb

...is there something she did that i missed? how do you have a scumread if this is all NIA?

i took the trollish behaviour in the topic with Klingon as NIA. either she's town and did a

terrible

reaction test, or she was scum mucking around for any number of reasons. i have no way of knowing whether she actually made a mistake and really thought klingon was on her scumteam, but that's because i don't believe her daycop for a minute.

Not Chara · Post Post #6405 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:34 pm

speaking of the Math wagon, all it did was make me annoyed at myself. i'm not going to let myself be swayed by vocal town in that manner again if i can help it.

Varsoon · Post Post #6406 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:36 pm

In post 6342, Reasonably Rational wrote:
@Varsoon: Is the vc correct? Firebringer is missing from the list of players
.

Whoops.
I'll update it to be correct.
My E-Z P-Z text doc was clearly not updated and, ergo, not so EZ or PZ.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6407 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:37 pm

Mainly the late ascetic claim + the kc stuff.

She's trying to say it's a gambit, but wtf kind of gambit is it when you claim enough shit that nobody is going to believe your gambit?

-Cerb

Mas y Menos · Post Post #6408 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:38 pm

Ohh btw I can ally again.
So I am allying with shiro

V: So Alt-Slip
Very Disgrace

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6409 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:39 pm

Granted, the late ascetic claim was obviously not telling in mathblades case but they friggin LIED about having claimed it earlier, so...yeah.

-Cerb

kraskaesque · Post Post #6410 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:40 pm

In post 6405, Not Chara wrote:i'm not going to let myself be swayed by vocal town in that manner again if i can help it.

Owww drats
I was planning on yelling until shadow gets rope >:(

Firebringer · Post Post #6411 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:40 pm

In post 6408, Mas y Menos wrote:Ohh btw I can ally again.
So I am allying with shiro

V: So Alt-Slip
Very Disgrace

I am drunk, sue me

Titus · Post Post #6412 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:41 pm

I want to ally with Shiro too.

Not Chara · Post Post #6413 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:42 pm

In post 6407, Reasonably Rational wrote:Mainly the late ascetic claim + the kc stuff.

She's trying to say it's a gambit, but wtf kind of gambit is it when you claim enough shit that nobody is going to believe your gambit?

-Cerb

oh, right. i'd forgotten about her late ascetic claim.
it seems kind of paltry when compared to what she pulled in the thread, but if that's really usual for her...

i guess i just don't want to call that behaviour outright scum because it's more..

chaotic

than anything else. and it looks to me like she's that way usually.
Klingon at least was clear about the timeline of events, but DGB didn't seem to care how she was understood by the rest of the thread.

pedit: who lied about claiming ascetic earlier than they did?

Firebringer · Post Post #6414 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:43 pm

In post 6412, Titus wrote:I want to ally with Shiro too.

No me

kraskaesque · Post Post #6415 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:43 pm

(I'll be gone for like a couple of days bye)

Firebringer · Post Post #6416 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:44 pm

In post 6415, kraskaesque wrote:(I'll be gone for like a couple of days bye)

Miss you

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #6417 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:44 pm

vasoon is asleep at the switch again.....

Its a good man.. running a game is hard work.

Not Chara · Post Post #6418 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:44 pm

In post 6410, kraskaesque wrote:
In post 6405, Not Chara wrote:i'm not going to let myself be swayed by vocal town in that manner again if i can help it.
Owww drats
I was planning on yelling until shadow gets rope >:(

the difference is i certainly wouldn't fight you on that lynch.

In post 6412, Titus wrote:I want to ally with Shiro too.

no. you're allying with me.
i would say you're allying with me

and

Shiro as a compromised, but i'm open to the idea of scum Shiro and don't want to ally with them.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6419 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:45 pm

Also, can whoever controls this delayed flip thing (because OBVIOUSLY someone directly controls it, or else mathblades flip wouldn't have happened in the middle of the night) please make up your mind about whatever the fuck you have to discuss and make KC flip so we can go ahead and incorporate that knowledge into our scumhunting today?

Thanks.

-Cerb

Pedit; guess what? Tomorrows the season finale, so you can BOTH ally with Shiro if that's what you want!

Peditx2: Mathblade did. They claimed cooldog had crumbed it in a specific post....and they hadn't.

That was thr proverbial nail in their coffin from our Drixxs perspective. I didn't understand why they'd lie about that as either alignment, but whatever.

Firebringer · Post Post #6420 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:45 pm

If we can as Mafia society just ban all delayed flips I would be a happy camper

Firebringer · Post Post #6421 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:47 pm

Rr want to ally for funsies?

Not Chara · Post Post #6422 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:47 pm

Rational: going by what happened with SirCakez and Mathblade, i'm pretty sure they flip a day phase after they were killed. Klingon was killed at night, so she won't flip until the end of Day.
and: i just explained why i don't want to ally with Shiro. i want to ally with Titus and one other of Yume/farside/Firebringer/grapes.

Not Chara · Post Post #6423 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:48 pm

two guesses about why Mathblade did it, not that it matters: they really mistook one of CoolDog's posts as an ascetic claim, because they knew they had the role and were looking for it,

or

it was a strange, last-ditch attempt to not be lynched for the unclaimed ascetic.

Not Chara · Post Post #6424 (ISO) » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:49 pm

In post 6422, Not Chara wrote:Rational: going by what happened with SirCakez and Mathblade, i'm pretty sure they flip
a phase
after they were killed. Klingon was killed at night, so she won't flip until the end of Day.
and: i just explained why i don't want to ally with Shiro. i want to ally with Titus and one other of Yume/farside/Firebringer/grapes.

EBWOP