farside town = BNL scum absolutely (so they would hammer)
farside scum = who hammers is less important in this case but still i would need to really consider who it should be.
farside, opinion? i know you're the one to be lynched in this case, but still.
i've never played with this role or strategy so i don't know if there's something i haven't considered. it sounds like it would work.
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."
i just realized hiw batshit insane my last post was. BNL needs to hammer. i started it as a 'this works if farside is town or scum' but forgot halfway through what i was trying to do and startef working out team possibilities again...
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."
In post 800, Not Chara wrote:farside town = BNL scum absolutely (so they would hammer)
farside scum = who hammers is less important in this case but still i would need to really consider who it should be.
farside, opinion? i know you're the one to be lynched in this case, but still.
i've never played with this role or strategy so i don't know if there's something i haven't considered. it sounds like it would work.
Well I'm not thrilled with being lynched.
Players don't trust me because of the lack of kill?
Bnl?
Because I see lane scum more then others?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
I see lane more scummy then bnl.
Lane reads more like lashing out and Chara reads as figuring thing out.
I'm not opposed to bnl given that he makes sense with lane.
quick informal announcement: as a Floridian I am likely to be affected by the hurricane coming through our state later this week. My apologies for any delays in the game it may cause.
The bunny knight reigns supreme!
Get to know me! Here! and now Here too!
I see lane more scummy then bnl.
Lane reads more like lashing out and Chara reads as figuring thing out.
I'm not opposed to bnl given that he makes sense with lane.
Lashing out is a scum tell for me?
It's not just lashing out.
It's more foaming at the mouth for nonsensical reasons.
Question: would you hammer me knowing I have a Supersaint ability?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
if they didn't hammer, it wouldn't be difficult to swing the lynch to the one who refuses to hammer.
the problem is if we pick the wrong person to hammer and you both end up being town. but that's the same problem we get if we don't lynch you and lynch town instead.
farside, your lane read is fine. i was suspicious of you for your play yesterday for reasons. but i'm reconsidering.
dismissing farside/Charloux/McMenno as town by virtue of farside town and the supersaint/jailkeep... it's BNL/lane. BnL was scum yesterday as well, i can't see them flipping anything else.
i would be ok with just lynching that today.
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."
Lynching farside today isn't a good idea IMO unless we think farside is scum (which I don't). A mislynch through Farside is instant loss, while if we mislynch normally we still have multiple chances to maintain parity and not lose yet.
@Not Chara: You were already townreading Farside earlier in the Day, so why did you dismiss McMenno as town only now and not in 758? (I know I've talked to you on 758 already but your 809 makes me suspicious of it again)
quick informal announcement: as a Floridian I am likely to be affected by the hurricane coming through our state later this week. My apologies for any delays in the game it may cause.
I see lane more scummy then bnl.
Lane reads more like lashing out and Chara reads as figuring thing out.
I'm not opposed to bnl given that he makes sense with lane.
Lashing out is a scum tell for me?
It's not just lashing out.
It's more foaming at the mouth for nonsensical reasons.
Question: would you hammer me knowing I have a Supersaint ability?
No, I wouldn't hammer you not knowing that either. I'm voting for who I'm scum reading
In post 812, Not Chara wrote:McMenno was already town, i was simply re-iterating.
if a farside mislynch would be instant loss even if scum is the hammerer, we shouldn't do it.
770. Ok, I see you call McMenno town, but at the same time you doubt Lane being scum and end up with Me/Lane and Me/McMenno as possible scumteams. Explain?
No, scum hammering Farside won't cause an instant loss, only town hammering town Farside will. By "lynch through Farside" I meant forcing that person to hammer Farside.
I only said that I think that forcing someone to hammer farside instead of lynching them directly was a bad idea in general, and not a self-defense specifically.
In post 817, Not Chara wrote:i called them both town there but had precious few options. that was why i was suspicious of farside in the first place. PoE trumps everything.
Lucky, i will be V/LA until Saturday, whenever you happen to see this.