STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

McMenno · Post Post #7450 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:21 am

sharing is pagetopping right

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #7451 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:26 am

In post 7441, Yume wrote:Actually, I did lie to her, and this is why

In post 5696, mastin2 wrote:
Ergo. This game is not going to have third party players. I would lynch any claimed third party player on sight, even if I were townreading them previously.

You can't use that as a defense.

She didn't say that until mid-late day 2, and you were in a pt with her from the start of D1. She wouldn't have made that statement had you told her the truth in the first place. Why didn't you?

@Creature: read the game, learn to understand the game state, and...for someone who says they read one of my games in the past...you seem awfully unaware of the deliberation with which I post. That is to say, flailing is foreign to me. I don't get flustered and lash out.

@Titus: was your post saying you choose to ignore it you telling me to table the matter? I will, but please get a straight answer from Yume in private.

-Cerb

farside22 · Post Post #7452 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:28 am

I was going to quote and replay to stuff but that gets long and lost.

Yume: I'm fine with you withholding KC flip. I do ask that when a player is lynched you flip them. The info night 1 for cakez would have helped more for night actions then seeing it the next day.

Titus: I have conflicting reads. At first I was confused but either the player is scum or rr is telling the truth and there are other players going for a 3rd party win con.

Dgb: how is town trying to also do a possible 3rd party win con = scum?

Yume · Post Post #7453 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:30 am

She likely had that stance from the very start, and had I told her, she would have simply lynched all of us.

Titus · Post Post #7454 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:32 am

@Cerb, It's too late. I was too subtle.

@Farside, There are other third parties. So you claiming that is a load of shit to me.

Yume · Post Post #7455 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:33 am

But if it makes you feel better I will be gone. Listen to Onion. *shoots self*

Titus · Post Post #7456 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:35 am

Yume, stay. Please.

farside22 · Post Post #7457 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:36 am

In post 7454, Titus wrote:@Cerb, It's too late. I was too subtle.

@Farside, There are other third parties. So you claiming that is a load of shit to me.

This is why you are not worth responding to.

Yume · Post Post #7458 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:37 am

Okay....

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #7459 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:37 am

In post 7453, Yume wrote:She likely had that stance from the very start, and had I told her, she would have simply lynched all of us.

...

Bullshit. Not an acceptable answer. There are too many crystal gems for such a course to be reasonable, AND with a sizable voting block under your control, the odds are FAR less likely that a successful lynch will occur even if she were to make that decision...and flavor wise, most of the game wouldn't lynch you guys on principle, barring proof of an incompatible win con.

@Titus: I'm sorta confused actually now. No idea what you were too subtle about. I can like...just drop it. ;p
-Cerb

Yume · Post Post #7460 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:39 am

farside22 · Post Post #7461 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:41 am

In post 7449, Creature wrote:Actually, just noticed something.

VOTE: DGB

I'm paying attention.
I'm assuming you believe I can make my vote bigger?
Amazingly she that shall not be named hasn't asked for proof, but knowing her, once proven she'd still call me scum.
Scum that when targeted you are told I rb you.
Because the mod thinks giving you the name of a player would lead to scum.
Yes that makes complete sense from varsoon.

Titus · Post Post #7462 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:43 am

In post 6348, Titus wrote:[redacted]

I spoke to Yume. I am currently undecided on whether or not third parties exist. I 100% follow Mastina's reasoning, and did before I spoke with Yume. In the interests of town cohesion, I will stay that way. So please don't ask. Especially you RR. .

This was me telling you that you were right, but not to push.

farside22 · Post Post #7463 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:43 am

In post 7458, Yume wrote:Okay....

Ill start ranting if I have to explain.
I'd rather not.
I'm also paying attention to the votes on me.
Come on people, Titus says vote me, listen to her.
Let's go!

Yume · Post Post #7464 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:44 am

That was to Onion, not you.

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #7465 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:49 am

so hows this going?

Yume · Post Post #7466 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:56 am

In post 7459, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 7453, Yume wrote:She likely had that stance from the very start, and had I told her, she would have simply lynched all of us.
...

Bullshit. Not an acceptable answer. There are too many crystal gems for such a course to be reasonable, AND with a sizable voting block under your control, the odds are FAR less likely that a successful lynch will occur even if she were to make that decision...and flavor wise, most of the game wouldn't lynch you guys on principle, barring proof of an incompatible win con.

@Titus: I'm sorta confused actually now. No idea what you were too subtle about. I can like...just drop it. ;p
-Cerb

If you are so certain, go ahead and lynch me. D:

Yume · Post Post #7467 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:56 am

I'm sure you'd get mastin's help in that alley.

Titus · Post Post #7468 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:03 am

Yeah, Yume. We are not lynching you. You are too valuable even if you were not obviously town helpful. Your buds are open to be scum fakes. Not you. The mod confirmed you to be Steven Universe. Steven Universe is not a threat to earth. So, no. We are not lynching you.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #7469 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:04 am

Lol, why would I lynch you? I just want to understand. :/ Not willing to risk mislynching someone who could be practically conftown when things would be cleared up with basically any crystal gems flip.

-Cerb

Yume · Post Post #7470 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:06 am

@Titus You yourself said you might do it eventually, so just get it over with.

kraskaesque · Post Post #7471 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:06 am

I DONT UNDERSTAND
IS YUME A 3P TOO?

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #7472 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:07 am

you know what this site needs.

a minus ISO feature where i can read the game without posts from some players.

Titus · Post Post #7473 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:08 am

In post 7469, Reasonably Rational wrote:Lol, why would I lynch you? I just want to understand. :/ Not willing to risk mislynching someone who could be practically conftown when things would be cleared up with basically any crystal gems flip.

-Cerb

Cerb, I don't think Yume will be conftown when any gem flips. Do you really think there's a 4+ person masonry combined with Mastina's ability plus my own? Plus the beach event?

Steven is confirmed protown now because Steven isn't scum. Like 100% right now. Never lynching Yume. If Yume is scum, the game is bastard.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #7474 (ISO) » Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:09 am

In post 7469, Reasonably Rational wrote:Lol, why would I lynch you? I just want to understand. :/ Not willing to risk mislynching someone who could be practically conftown when things would be cleared up with basically any crystal gems flip.

-Cerb

There is a viable reason that Yume may have not shared (I'm not sure what she has shared) that it serves ZERO purpose discussing in this thread. Actually two now that I think about it.

So can we move on from this pointless line of discussion?

I mean - if you think Yume and the rest of the Crystal Gems are a threat to Town then try to remove them. Otherwise stop being pedantic.