In post 795, BNL wrote:@Lane: What do you think of McMenno's potential gambit?
I think it's a potential gambit.
You clearly weren't trying with this answer.
In post 824, lane0168 wrote:So is mylo right? What we can assume is there is probably 1 scum on me, and 1 scum between bnl, NC, and mcmenno
Sudden change of attitude also seems fake.
In post 843, lane0168 wrote:VOTE: Charloux guess I never realized it wasn't, not that it matters with zero support
You admit that Charloux isn't getting lynched today, so why don't you agree to compromise for a lesser scumread? Your vote is useless otherwise. why not make it useful?
Who said it's scummy trying to survive? I just think it's dumb trying to come up with reasons when it's obvious you just don't want to be lynched. Which I can't blame you for. I'd do the same thing and vote you, but I don't feel like losing
I don't think me and mcmenno needed then cred enough to block our own shot.
I wasn't trying on that question because I'm not concerned with it right now. Not scummy.
Not sure what you mean by sudden change in attitude. That's pretty bad.
Why am I not pushing for your lynch when you seem to be the easiest one right now? Because I'm more sure of Charloux and you being wrong.
Why let my partner sit on a wagon with no intention to push it?
Did a thorough read through and pretty convinced that this is scum now. There is one scum in {Farside, Charloux, Lane}, and one in {McMenno, Not Chara} FMPOV. Charloux is a solid townread, and I've read through to make sure that Farside/McMenno and Farside/Not Chara aren't scum teams, and besides, I'm townreading her D3 play too. (For example, her unvote in 838 doesn't make sense as scum).
On the other hand, Lane is really scummy now, primarily regarding his tunnel on Charloux, which seems really contrived and fake at this point. There are other reasons, but my top two townreads and one top scumread in that pool is sufficient for me to vote Lane.
This is what I thought but nc seemed to see lane as town and mcmenno was seeing you as scum and I thought fuck am I going nuts here.
Vote: lane
That's not moving.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
was that hammer? did any of farside/Charloux/BNL unvote before that?
i can only see someone hammering themselves like that as scum. then again, i don't know the precedence.
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."
- You may target a player at night. You will be given a guilty or not guilty result.
Miller
- You appear as guilty on a cop investigation.
Redirector
- You may target two players at night. The first player will have any targeted abilities (including night kills) resolved on the second target, regardless of who they originally submitted as a target.
Day 4 has begun!
Vote Count 4.0
Charloux -
BulletNLynchproof -
farside22 -
Not Chara-
Not Voting - Everyone!
With 4 alive it takes 3 to lynch!
The bunny knight reigns supreme!
Get to know me! Here! and now Here too!
it's 3 to lynch, BNL. there are two no lynch votes. L-1.
why on earth would i quickhammer end the day as scum when the next day is lylo? think before you post.
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."
@Mod how does redirector work? Anyone who targets Target 1 targets Target 2 instead, or all Target 1's actions target Target 2 regardless of who they intended?
Briefly, in the former case, we use Cop+Redir as Cop+Doc to sort Me/NC, while in the second case, we redir Me/NC onto each other. Only conftown gets the PRs. Will elaborate later.
One takes a cop and the other takes the redirector. The one with the redirector swtiches the target from the cop to a non-confirmed one. Who scum targets is irrelevant. Btw thanks for the gift farside.
not how Redirector works.
you coose player 1 and player 2. all of player 1's action targets are changed to be player 2. if you redirect the cop, that cop will be forced to check who you redirect to. it can't be used as a doctor.
unless Lucky is using a strange variant, i suppose.
"You're the oddest juxtaposition of reasonable and unreasonable I've ever seen."
