I'm not making a case, I'm making a point.In post 1019, Accountant wrote:House is making a case on Nahdia that's built solely on meta. I'm asking if anyone can confirm this meta.
Bit of a difference.
I'm not making a case, I'm making a point.In post 1019, Accountant wrote:House is making a case on Nahdia that's built solely on meta. I'm asking if anyone can confirm this meta.
I noticed this earlier: draws are possible?In post 1, Skullduggery wrote: (18) Additional votes include VOTE: No Lynch to end the Day with no lynch (which will also require a majority) and VOTE: Draw to end the game in a draw (which will require 100% agreement from all living players).
In post 1019, Accountant wrote:House is making a case on Nahdia that's built solely on meta. I'm asking if anyone can confirm this meta.
again, you disagree that giga's replace out was towny (it was), and use that as a reason to call my stance unreasonable.In post 1005, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Nice reaction. Can you point to where I said everyone who reads them correctly is scum? Nope you can’t. I have chosen you for your ISO specifically in conjunction with your declaration that "Giga's replace out is Town" which isn't a reasonable conclusion from an uniformed viewpoint. Funny that you are also trying to explain to me the ‘rules’ of hunting scum …In post 995, Not Chara wrote:Magna: so, you misreading Nahdia means every person who read them correctly is scum. they're that scummy.
whiteknighting is not a claim you can make unless you can point to where i've drawn conclusions about giga's alignment where they couldn't exist. you've not.
starting whereIn post 1032, McMenno wrote:the series of posts before 1030 was undescribably bad
In post 1017, Gamma Emerald wrote:She unvoted me, didn't post for a while, and then voted me again.In post 1016, McMenno wrote:hey I get you have the ego of a small sun but it ain't impossible for town to scumread you, weirdly enough
I read somewhere that that quick vote flip-flop is a scumtell, but I can't find the article.
In post 1022, Not Chara wrote:who is this 'she' you speak of?
Gamma, you aren't going to get very far with textbook tells. i'm not even sure that is one. you have to look at intent.
you might actually be town for the lack of noticing how you've been flipping votes yourself. from Nahdia onto pepto because they 'redeemed the slot', then pepto even though you disagree with the way the votes on the wagon happened.
shouldn't it make you pause and think if those voting pepto didn't give good reasons?
In post 1024, Gamma Emerald wrote:The vote posts didn't give good reasons, but I saw evidence that pointed to Pepto scum anyway.In post 1022, Not Chara wrote:who is this 'she' you speak of?
Gamma, you aren't going to get very far with textbook tells. i'm not even sure that is one. you have to look at intent.
you might actually be town for the lack of noticing how you've been flipping votes yourself. from Nahdia onto pepto because they 'redeemed the slot', then pepto even though you disagree with the way the votes on the wagon happened.
shouldn't it make you pause and think if those voting pepto didn't give good reasons?
Just because a wagon was poorly formed doesn't mean it's full of scum.
My wagon however...
In post 1029, Not Chara wrote:a few things: ignore 1014.
UNVOTE:
i was wrong, i think this is town Gamma after all. i was distracted by his demeanor, which didn't remind me of him in previous town games. now i'm thinking that was genuine frustration, his play now is more like the actual scumhunting i was looking for.
Gamma: i was strongly assuming multiball/serial killer from the get-go, only because of the flavour. that does make sense. however, i don't know if voting to draw is an indication of third parties. is that what it usually means, older players? i'm wondering if the option for a draw (which is lesser than a win no matter how you look at it) has more to do with Undertale flavour itself and less with the anti-town alignments in the setup. i could be wrong, i've never seen a mod put that rule in before and didn't really notice it until Gamma brought it up.
these postsIn post 1030, Gamma Emerald wrote:UnFOS: Not Chara
I'm townreading them based on how they are reacting.
And side note:good flavor catch!
wait, this was to Gamma? since when does he have an ego?In post 1016, McMenno wrote:hey I get you have the ego of a small sun but it ain't impossible for town to scumread you, weirdly enough
What does that mean, specifically the first half of the statement?In post 1045, Creature wrote:Also, please, get out of Pepto. I am slowly changing my mind on that slot.
can you talk about this in more detail? i ISOed you for mentions of Cakez, but it's mostly things you say he does as either alignment. unless you were being sarcastic.In post 1041, Creature wrote:Still think SirCakez is.