Could've been a little bit swayed with the activity at the start, but I just thought he was like expressing his thoughts about the game a lot and well at least I thought it was pretty genuine.In post 213, Thor665 wrote:I have played with him at least once prior to this game.In post 212, ecane wrote:@Creature, Thor
Have you both played with Flubber before? You mentioned he's pretending to be solving the game. Are there any other games that made you think that, or are there any concrete examples here?
I don't see him as particulary townie, but not scummy either.
I would say the evidence is easily present in this game, and when I made the statement it was entirely based on this game.
As an easy example - read his first 10 or so posts in the game, and note that he isn't really applying much pressure, isn't offering opinions, and the most focused attack he has is basically asking other people to attack someone for something he doesn't even find scummy but agrees with.
I would happily argue that the first real genuine idea expressed clearly that is unquestioningly scumhunting doesn't come in until 27 posts in. Giving him something like a 25/1 ratio of empty posting to posts that look like scumhunting.
Do you think he looks like he's solving anything?
If so - what?
If not - why ask this?
I find it weird how people are being pretty much fine with the lynch while prior to that they have expressed no particular thoughts about it whatsoever. Scum could easily just hop on the wagon that's forming rn, if they haven't already, and I feel like all would be good for them since almost everyone seems to be doing it anyways.
It just somehow seems too easy.
For that matter.. @Lowell, qubixes..explain please.
Especially Lowell. You unvoted Flubber in 104, what changed your mind?
