Word.In post 166, Transcend wrote:drealmerz's vote on kts was scummy as fuck
Fuck yes
Trans is gonna be so excited if I townread him this game
Word.In post 166, Transcend wrote:drealmerz's vote on kts was scummy as fuck
Fuck yes
yeah this is a solid pointIn post 180, kraska77 wrote:this coupled with his join date is scum he cant really believe this shitIn post 113, Pine wrote:Quick skim of VCs shows an early big wagon on Aeronaut? That definitely deserves a look
<3In post 182, Transcend wrote:kts is a mislynch you stupid fucks
and this time since he's getting lynchbaited as really obvious town and i'm actually town i'm gonna actually stop the lynch on him
Wow, how do you make this statement and quote RB as if he's not 1000x worse. Why does KTS's playstyle make him scum?In post 184, Pine wrote:Holy sweet Christ, this thread is a hot mess. Quoted is practically the only thing that's been said so far that has been informative and worth the time it took to read it. Including my earlier post - I skimmed playerlist, checked votecounts in mod ISO, and then didn't take the level of insane in this playerlist seriously. If I'd read even the first two dozen posts, there's nothing doing with the Aeronaut quickwagon. My mistake.In post 60, rb wrote:great, so this game is full of bad players
Unvote
Vote: KTS
I absolutely despise this playstyle. I'm sorry, but being a bullying asshole is not a valid way to play a social game. You've got bullshit coming out of your ears, dude, and haven't done -any- valid scumhunting or investigation. No.
OMFGIn post 189, Pine wrote:Right now the only partial read I have is of you, rb, because you're the only one actually explaining yourself. I've got a really weak Townread on you, but that's really mostly that you're the only one making sense and trying to do real analysis.
A decent point but that was shadows first real post. I liked ur vote where it was.In post 202, Transcend wrote:shadow he plays like this as either alignment
also if you thought kts might have been living up to his scum meta, how come you didn't jump on the forming bandwagon on him?
VOTE: Shadow_step
stop townreading RB so hard please. Other townreads are good.In post 208, Transcend wrote:scumpile: kraskanumbers, twoface, shadow_step, aero, drealmerz7
eh: pine (too emotional but could be town driven), zach, gamma (lean town but not enough to put in a townpile), LUV
u haven't posted yet: jarjarjarjarjarjarjarjarjarjarjar
townpile: kts (for now), dave, zulfy
if he's scum i lost: rb
i have an enormous scumpile and too many eh's and need to work on it lol
I'd support a lurker lynch. People on this site don't do em often enough.In post 228, rb wrote:^ I've legit never seen a policy lynch either and I actually think they're good. lurkers stop lurking when they see town is srs bznz about lynching their asses
well this post is pretty scummy.In post 230, TwoFace wrote:Couldn't tell ya. Don't have any reads yet. It's way too early.In post 222, rb wrote:TwoFace: who's scum and who's town. Top2 of each.
Gonna reread our mason game but I don't recall you not having early reads there.In post 284, TwoFace wrote:the truth is scummy? please explain that.
In post 227, TwoFace wrote:They do? I haven't seen a policy lynch in long time.In post 207, Transcend wrote:same.
policy lynches are dumb and happen far too often. as well as town losses.
We PL on my HS for many reasons and they are a good thing. It demands town play better, it makes the game more fun and less a clusterfuck. It makes scum have a tighter game, it makes town have to actually work on making a case against someone.In post 228, rb wrote:^ I've legit never seen a policy lynch either and I actually think they're good. lurkers stop lurking when they see town is srs bznz about lynching their asses
Yep. Preach it! Everyone should be thinking this way, imo. Everyone. Those who don't just want to play shitty so they can hide their scumness in shitty play when they draw scum. It's LAME.In post 231, rb wrote:and i've regretted not policy lynching a couple times when some lurkerscumfuck or someone just trolling nonstop won the game as scum because no one wanted to 'policy lynch' when actually it's not policy, it's lynching a slot that's having zero pro-town impact on the game and that's as likely to be scum as town regardless of what anyone says. and if it's not, it's the only way people learn to stop being anti-town fucks
this ^In post 235, rb wrote: p-edit: pls don't answer for other people before they do, I have the bad habit of doing this but it's important that ppl give their own reasons for things or it becomes a clusterfuck to sort slots and especially cumbersome when trying to re-read the game with new information (from NK's, flips etc.)
In post 189, Pine wrote:I can't yet
People who play like this look scummy no matter what they do, because I normally associate overconfident reads with the informed minority, i.e.But when you've got half the thread making ironclad reads and bold statements three pages in, that's just stupid play. I don't interpret that well. It's going to take some time, and necessitates thinning the herdscum.
Right now the only partial read I have is of you, rb, because you're the only one actually explaining yourself. I've got a, but that's really mostly that you're the only one making sense and trying to do real analysis. That's easy to fake when you've been given this kind of fodder though, so mehreallyweakTownreadon you
Please point out specific examples.In post 293, Pine wrote:KTS was bullying and abusing people who disagreed.
WhatIn post 189, Pine wrote: Right now the only partial read I have is of you, rb, because you're the only one actually explaining yourself.
You can literally say the exact same thing about rbIn post 190, Pine wrote:Sorry, that was half a post. My vote's on KTS right now because of the blatantly scummy antics described above. Granted, they're displayed by lots of players so far, but it's most pronounced with KTS. Bullying and browbeating are inherently scummy and antisocial, so I'd like to see him gone. It's a pretty weak read too, because I've seen Town do this on numerous occasions as well.
where's the scumfuckerry?In post 196, Transcend wrote:In post 192, kraska77 wrote:..........what?In post 184, Pine wrote:but being a bullying asshole is not a valid way to play a social game.
Are u sure uve for the right person here? Rb's play is fine and dandy but kts is a "bullying asshole"? Lol is this rb buddying?
stop being a scumfuck
This looks OKIn post 202, Transcend wrote:shadow he plays like this as either alignment
also if you thought kts might have been living up to his scum meta, how come you didn't jump on the forming bandwagon on him?
VOTE: Shadow_step
Nope. I'd very much like him to point out the specific posts that led him to vote for KTS. Just a blanket "He's scum cuz he's overconfident in his reads" is a garbage reason.In post 295, drealmerz7 wrote:jarjar, you sound like you're trolling