Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[Peers]

Forgive me if this sounds a bit off the wall; however, I've been stricken as of late by the queer feeling that Peers and TS could be distancing. I don't know what to think of this; however, I just want to put it out there to be either shot down or exonerated.

.... What?

No, wait... What?

So, since we voted for different people before, and now she's voting for me while I unvote for someone because he made a point that my reasons for voting him are no longer valid, that means we're distancing?

... ow, my brain...

[Toaster Strudel]

No desert for you tonight, punk! Get back here.

[Toaster Strudel]

Forgive me if this sounds a bit off the wall; however, I've been stricken as of late by the queer feeling that Peers and TS could be distancing. I don't know what to think of this; however, I just want to put it out there to be either shot down or exonerated.

.... What?

No, wait... What?

So, since we voted for different people before, and now she's voting for me while I unvote for someone because he made a point that my reasons for voting him are no longer valid, that means we're distancing?

... ow, my brain...

Sikario8 must be light years ahead of us. Like an extra-terrestrial.

But don't worry he's going to explain it. It'll be fun. I have high hopes.

[Mastermind of Sin]

MOS, have you got any reason for voting me other than that I'm voting you? You're smoke and mirrors accusation was ridiculous, I unvoted Peers when he was at -2, and very lynchable, and I was the

first

person to vote for you. How the hell were you an easy wagon if nobody else was voting you???

How the hell wasn't I an easy wagon with the anti-MoS sentiment that had already been growing before you voted me. Just because people hadn't placed a vote yet doesn't change the fact that the feeling was there. Everyone was speculating about me being a Jester or scum, and you took advantage of that to try and start a wagon on me.

[JordanA24]

MOS, have you got any reason for voting me other than that I'm voting you? You're smoke and mirrors accusation was ridiculous, I unvoted Peers when he was at -2, and very lynchable, and I was the

first

person to vote for you. How the hell were you an easy wagon if nobody else was voting you???

How the hell wasn't I an easy wagon with the anti-MoS sentiment that had already been growing before you voted me. Just because people hadn't placed a vote yet doesn't change the fact that the feeling was there. Everyone was speculating about me being a Jester or scum, and you took advantage of that to try and start a wagon on me.

Where's your evidence of this? How do you know I didn't simply just found you scummy enough to vote for you?

[Mastermind of Sin]

Because your case has no substance to it.

[Yosarian2]

I've hardly been pushing the lynch vehemently. I made my vote, people questioned it, and I explained myself. There was nothing vehement about it.

You're just throwing around smoke and flames, Jordan.

Unvote, Vote: Jordan

So, um...why, exactally, are you voting for him?

For throwing around smoke and flames. It seems like Jordan is just trying to kick up dust and cast suspicion on people, supporting whichever wagons seem the easiest to push.

When, exactally, was he "throwing around smoke and flames" or "trying to kick up dust"? Or "supporting whatever wagon seems easier to push", even. I'm all in favor of people lurker voting, but you're really not making a whole lot of sense here, MOS, and that's making your vote against him look really OMGUSy to me. Your current posts aren't helping that preception, either.

unvote:Sikario8

vote:MOS

[Mastermind of Sin]

I've already explained it. As have other people, so I know I'm not just seeing things. If you don't get it, tough. I'm not going to go out of my way to re-explain everything just because you can't figure it out.

[Yosarian2]

vote:mastermind of sin

[Mastermind of Sin]

You already did that.

[Yaw]

MoS asked me to post that he'll be V/LA through Tuesday. Thanks.

[schismatized]

I say somebody comes up with a clear argument that presents the case against MOS so then he can reply to it. He is acting odd, but so are many the people conveniently slipping in on his wagon.

[Yosarian2]

You already did that.

Yeah, I know. Just in case you missed it the first time.

Seriously, I'm voting for you because the explination you gave for your vote was illogical and apparently untrue, and your response is to...refuse to explain what you were talking about? How is that helpful?

[Toaster Strudel]

I say somebody comes up with a clear argument that presents the case against MOS so then he can reply to it.

http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 993#839993
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 731#854731

He is acting odd, but so are many the people conveniently slipping in on his wagon.

There will be many people to conveniently slip on

ANY

wagon. That doesn't make an MoS wagon any less worthy.

[zu_Faul]

[quote="Sikario8"]Either way
[quote="zu_Faul"]I don't buy the Jordan wagon at all. Now it's just people randomly jumping on it and when Jordan comes back he has to defend himself against such rubbish.

Vote: KaleiÐoscøpe

He did not post anything significant and did a bit of bandwagon jumping.[/quote]
So are you off of Peers or simply shifting your attention to a more reasonable cause (whatever that may mean)?[/quote]

[quote="zu_Faul on page 14 (post 349)"]Unvote
Peers seems good. Reread later today. [/quote]

[Battle Mage]

i guess i can go for an MoS wagon.

Unvote, Vote; MoS

IGMEOY: ABR

[Erg0]

Jordan makes an excellent point; I can't in good faith keep my vote on him.

Unvote

I would like to hear MoS's response to that last post. We may very well be in a situation where the top three bandwagons are all town.

I love how you slipped yourself into that last group.

MoS: how do you feel Jordan's play in this game compares to his usual playstyle? Have you played with him much before?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Let's not vote MoS now. Anybody but MoS.

[Battle Mage]

Let's not vote MoS now. Anybody but MoS.

lol i'm now increasingly happy with my vote.

[Mastermind of Sin]

You already did that.

Yeah, I know. Just in case you missed it the first time.

Seriously, I'm voting for you because the explination you gave for your vote was illogical and apparently untrue, and your response is to...refuse to explain what you were talking about? How is that helpful?

It's neither illogical nor untrue, and I've already explained both. I see no reason to repeat myself. I'm not refusing to explain. I'm refusing to repeat.

[Mastermind of Sin]

MoS: how do you feel Jordan's play in this game compares to his usual playstyle? Have you played with him much before?

In the past, I've found Jordan to be less aggressive and more reasonable as town, in my opinion.

[Yosarian2]

It's neither illogical nor untrue, and I've already explained both. I see no reason to repeat myself. I'm not refusing to explain. I'm refusing to repeat.

No, you, in fact, never explained how Jordan was "throwing around smoke and flames", how he was "trying to kick up dust and cast suspicion on people" or how he was "supporting whichever wagons seem the easiest to push". In fact, that third sentance is pretty obveously false, since the only vote of his that could at all be considered a "wagon" vote is the one one on you, and "voting for MOS" is not equal to "supporting whatever wagon seems easiest to push".

[PJ.]

I don't know if i responded to prod so i am, I will reread and post at a later date.

[Erg0]

MoS: how do you feel Jordan's play in this game compares to his usual playstyle? Have you played with him much before?

In the past, I've found Jordan to be less aggressive and more reasonable as town, in my opinion.

The only thing he's really being aggressive about is your attempt at a policy lynch. Rather than do the hypothetical question thing again, I'll just say that I don't think it's valid to judge him based on that. I could kind of see how you think he latched onto an easy argument, but it's hardly the worst offence of the day in my opinion.

[Sikario8]

IGME(andmyvote)OY: Peers

vote: peers