In post 11117, farside22 wrote:I get one point disbanding per player.
So one point for fuzzy.
If one disband with mastin_shadow and mastin is part of the alliance the odds get 2 points.
I'm short by 2 points.
Now if I successfully block an action I get 1 point.
So in short I'm short 1 point unless someone targets me then it work.
Earlier you said you get 1 point per person in the alliance, and you are a person in the alliance. I also believe you claimed to get 5 points from the joyride, which was a 5 person alliance including you...
In post 11119, Creature wrote:RR, didn't you realise farside claimed her ability can't block factional kills and she earned two points (meaning she was probably targeted)?
She later clarified and said she misunderstood her role abilities and that she in fact COULD block factional kills, and she announced that she roleblocked YOU. That's why MoI asked if anyone else could explain the lack of kill, because in the absence of any other explanation, Farside handed us a guilty on YOU. I mean ... apart from the fact that you have long since been scum trolling us with your posts, why did you think you are eating rope today?
That's what she claimed earlier. And now it should be clear why I'm proposing putting her claim to the test. I think any sane person will conclude that the claim "Town ascetic reflexive roleblocker who can also targeted roleblock who also can destroy alliances who also is lynchprooof (limited shots claim, in a game where abilities refresh periodically), who can also multi-vote, who is also bulletproof but can pursue two different alternate win conditions (remember she claimed that she could expend "Kevin Points" to "race" some other player, which she said she would
never
elaborate upon), at least one of which changes her alignment to third party and gives her a self-aligned win that doesn't interfere with the rest of the game (except that it adjusts the M/LYLO situation)" is just plain
. (Psst.... alignment change is BASTARD).
The problem is that all of those abilities have been demonstrated, except for the whole use 20 points and get a solo win part, and the "race" thing.
So now ask yourself ... do you want to bet the game that Farside is really that bullshit claim, or do you want to put it to the test before it bites us in the ass? If you actually want to bet the game, please go look at how SaGa Frontier ended (this is aimed at everyone).
In post 11121, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
I also don’t see the point of actively trying to get farside a third party win at this point if she is actively not looking for it. Frankly that’s making me look at RR again with skepticism.
--
No complaining when you basically just thrust yourself into the role ..
You don't see the point? She is caught in at least one outright lie at this point. The previously unclaimed BP ... do you really buy that she "misunderstood"? According to the established way she earns points, in her own words, she should get points equal to alliance size, including herself. That means she can be tested and we can know for sure tomorrow at essentially day start (since Varsoon allows for action queueing) whether or not she is mostly harmless (exits the game with a personal win regardless of the overall outcome) or caught in a web of lies.
If anyone wants to lay down any side bets, I now agree with Cerberus and suspect it is the latter.
I mean ... just read her ISO at this point. It sort of speaks for itself. I was going to dump a bunch of quotes in but either you care enough or you don't. Insert the whole <Lead a horse to water> wise saying here.
Nice use of the verb Thrust though.
~Drixx
P-Edit: Check alliance PT Random. I think you'll agree with the reasoning for the alliances I proposed.