Newbie 1763 | Foreigners of a Person - Happy Ending?

[Titus]

Actually I forgot about Row three.

UNVOTE:

That's still a fucked up assertion though.

Actually, you're right. There is one where there is no second PR. I forgot this revision.

[-Grey-]

I don't think "accidentally" voting yourself automatically makes you town.

I agree with you here. But it was Titus who said that, not Shannon. Shannon's willingness to die is anti-town. Not sure if that makes her scum.

Actually it's indicative of town.

Death is anti-scum more than it is anti-town because scum would lose half their team upon the death of a member.

Do math.

[-Grey-]

Actually I forgot about Row three.

UNVOTE:

That's still a fucked up assertion though.

Actually, you're right. There is one where there is no second PR. I forgot this revision.

Two.

Row one and column B.

[-Grey-]

No. I am not allowed to mislead as to optimal strategy. My duty is to play optimally, tell you what optimal play is, and tell you what site meta is. I want you to have fun and understand everything. I cannot win by deliberately musleading you or failing to correct you.

Sir meta is to claim on L-1

with intent

, but you have directly avoided explaining that.

Why?

[Titus]

No. I am not allowed to mislead as to optimal strategy. My duty is to play optimally, tell you what optimal play is, and tell you what site meta is. I want you to have fun and understand everything. I cannot win by deliberately musleading you or failing to correct you.

Sir meta is to claim on L-1

with intent

, but you have directly avoided explaining that.

Why?

I have and you'll find I repeat that over and over again.

Site meta is suboptimal. I am obligated to instruct on optimal play, not what lemmings find popular.

[Toto]

Titus can you link another IC game were you promote this?

[-Grey-]

I just read Mandy's ISO. She is scum.

I re-read Mandy's ISO. I don't think she is scum. UNVOTE: Mooney

Please enlighten us as to how that happened.

[Titus]

It's a recent position I take based on the rise of derp hammers, so no I cannot. It used to be that we could wait for intent to hammer, but some players just hammer anything at L minus 1.

[-Grey-]

It's a recent position I take based on the rise of derp hammers, so no I cannot. It used to be that we could wait for intent to hammer, but some players just hammer anything at L minus 1.

And they are not lynched for it, are they?

[Srceenplay]

It's a recent position I take based on the rise of derp hammers, so no I cannot. It used to be that we could wait for intent to hammer, but some players just hammer anything at L minus 1.

So you only just recently decided this is optimal? How recent?

[Toto]

First time I read it I got the impression she was only posting about game theory. Second time I didn't get such an impression. She posted some non game theory stuff too.

Pedit. I hope you understand our dilemma here

[-Grey-]

Here's where I'm standing.

fruitsman
Toto
shannon

Srceenplay

Titus
krylea

Elhabe21
Arrowscum

[-Grey-]

Since Arrow had my other scumread voting for him, I think I'd rather vote Elhabe.

VOTE: Elhabe

[Srceenplay]

Why Shannon so hi?

[-Grey-]

First time I read it I got the impression she was only posting about game theory. Second time I didn't get such an impression. She posted some non game theory stuff too.

Pedit. I hope you understand our dilemma here

406 please.

[-Grey-]

Why Shannon so hi?

401

[Srceenplay]

I don't understand this at all.

So why do scum hammer themselves sometimes.

[Toto]

First time I read it I got the impression she was only posting about game theory. Second time I didn't get such an impression. She posted some non game theory stuff too.

Pedit. I hope you understand our dilemma here

406 please.

Err that was supposed to answer 406

[Srceenplay]

Can you elaborate on why elhabe

[Toto]

I don't think "accidentally" voting yourself automatically makes you town.

I agree with you here. But it was Titus who said that, not Shannon. Shannon's willingness to die is anti-town. Not sure if that makes her scum.

Actually it's indicative of town.

Death is anti-scum more than it is anti-town because scum would lose half their team upon the death of a member.

Do math.

Its anti town if she is town. It makes our numbers smaller too

[-Grey-]

First time I read it I got the impression she was only posting about game theory. Second time I didn't get such an impression. She posted some non game theory stuff too.

Pedit. I hope you understand our dilemma here

406 please.

Err that was supposed to answer 406

Derp sorry, been reading for a while and skimmed 410 in my hurry to finish catching up.

[Titus]

It's a recent position I take based on the rise of derp hammers, so no I cannot. It used to be that we could wait for intent to hammer, but some players just hammer anything at L minus 1.

So you only just recently decided this is optimal? How recent?

1-2 months ago give or take.

[Srceenplay]

I understand that. But if you look at that entire exchange was it not acting antitown?

[-Grey-]

I don't think "accidentally" voting yourself automatically makes you town.

I agree with you here. But it was Titus who said that, not Shannon. Shannon's willingness to die is anti-town. Not sure if that makes her scum.

Actually it's indicative of town.

Death is anti-scum more than it is anti-town because scum would lose half their team upon the death of a member.

Do math.

Its anti town if she is town. It makes our numbers smaller too

Lynching anti-town does not advance my wincon.

[Srceenplay]

It's a recent position I take based on the rise of derp hammers, so no I cannot. It used to be that we could wait for intent to hammer, but some players just hammer anything at L minus 1.

So you only just recently decided this is optimal? How recent?

1-2 months ago give or take.

Ok. So you can link to it and tell me about it