Newbie 1765 | URW | Endgame

[toblerone187]

Although, while we're looking at lurkers, why are we letting toblerone slip under the radar?

@toblerone187, what are your thoughts on the game right now. Scum/town reads?

pedit: Hmm, that unvote is interesting. Not sure I agree that's a good reason to unvote.

Are you referring to MY unvote?
If so I think it is a very good reason to unvote. It was clearly a joke vote and I had forgotten it was still there until the votecount was posted. I did not want a joke vote to remain

[toblerone187]

can we brainstorm the possibility of Nachomamma, an IC, being mafia. Is this likely, anyone getting any Town reads off of him.

I was thinking he seems to be leading the game but I am not sure if that is his job as IC

[toblerone187]

What does "pedit" mean?

[LicketyQuickety]

I gave two examples from the same game, you should read them.

To be honest I have enough on my plate reading this game and trying to analyse it and learn as I go along. I don't have time to read other games - or have i misunderstood you?

It was a conversation between myself and Nacho, which means you should have at least taken a look at it, but I'll link it again:

Yes, well, I don't read people in a traditional way.

Can you back it up?
If you have reasoning that trends outside the box, then that's "non-traditional".
If you don't, then you're reading with gut which is plenty traditional if incredibly difficult to calibrate.

yes, I have reasons for my unconventional reads, but I don't like to explain them so I try and get people to do what I want though other means. I've been playing a lot less "direct" lately. Take that for what you will.

here and here for reference of my reasoning.

Those are posts, not games.

[toblerone187]

Also Connor, by logical i mean with evidence from night phases which we can use to deduce and conclude things with ease other than make assumptions purely made on the first few posts in Day 1. Normally (At least where i played) Day 1 is a warm up, we get cozy and slowly introduce our playstyles to eachother hence my not so contribution to the actual objective. As also as a norm, I never do reads day 1 because it's too early to judge, too early to analyse, deduce, conclude and speak so confidently about my own thoughts when it comes to other players however I do understand why that may not be the case here because of the length of the days which personally i think is ridiculous but also logical in its own ways

Ok sorry Lovesick is not such a newbie as I had thought

[Lovesick]

Also Connor, by logical i mean with evidence from night phases which we can use to deduce and conclude things with ease other than make assumptions purely made on the first few posts in Day 1. Normally (At least where i played) Day 1 is a warm up, we get cozy and slowly introduce our playstyles to eachother hence my not so contribution to the actual objective. As also as a norm, I never do reads day 1 because it's too early to judge, too early to analyse, deduce, conclude and speak so confidently about my own thoughts when it comes to other players however I do understand why that may not be the case here because of the length of the days which personally i think is ridiculous but also logical in its own ways

Ok sorry Lovesick is not such a newbie as I had thought

I may have gotten rusty/out of touch with it all since the last time I have played was about 3 years ago lol

[Plotinus]

Official Vote Count 1.04

S

u

c

c

e

s

s

!

F

i

n

i

s

h

e

d

m

a

k

i

n

g

t

h

e

r

a

f

t

,

a

n

d

t

h

e

s

e

s

t

a

a

n

d

w

e

w

e

r

e

a

b

l

e

t

o

g

o

o

u

t

o

n

t

o

t

h

e

l

a

k

e

t

o

s

e

t

t

h

e

n

e

t

s

.

W

e

s

h

o

u

l

d

c

h

e

c

k

t

h

e

m

t

o

m

o

r

r

o

w

.

W

e

'

r

e

p

r

e

t

t

y

h

u

n

g

r

y

a

n

d

o

u

r

s

t

a

r

v

a

t

i

o

n

m

e

t

r

e

i

s

a

t

1

%

n

o

w

.

I

f

i

t

g

e

t

s

u

p

t

o

1

0

0

%

,

y

o

u

d

i

e

,

b

u

t

i

t

t

a

k

e

s

s

o

m

e

w

e

e

k

s

t

o

d

i

e

o

f

s

t

a

r

v

a

t

i

o

n

s

o

w

e

'

r

e

g

o

n

n

a

b

e

o

k

a

y

.

---

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Superhans

(L-4): TheDominator37

Lovesick

(L-3): Nachomamma8, ConnorJC

Rautherdir

(L-4): LicketyQuickety

Not voting

(5): Lovesick, toblerone187, FancyPants, Superhans, Rautherdir

M

o

d

n

o

t

e

s

:

K

e

e

p

i

t

f

u

n

!

D

e

a

d

l

i

n

e

:

(expired on 2016-12-30 14:00:00)

.

[LicketyQuickety]

I really hope we catch some fish.

[Rautherdir]

What does "pedit" mean?

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Preview_Edit

[toblerone187]

What does "pedit" mean?

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Preview_Edit

Thanks

[LicketyQuickety]

I didn't say that I would unvote one Lovesick had posted. I said I would unvote once Lovesick had offered an original scum/town diagnosis.
...
UNVOTE: LoveSick

But, Lovesick hasn't offered any reads/thoughts. Why the unvote?

As a matter of fact, Lovesick's only contributions are defending herself. Not one post actively participating in the 'find scum' part of mafia.
VOTE: LoveSick

(L-2)

Clever, that made me smile.

[FancyPants]

@Toblerone, if you had to kill someone right now who would it be.
@Connor, my reads are implicit in my earlier post. But I will explain any individual read if you wish, can you specifically point out why Dom is your biggest scum read?

[Nachomamma8]

Could be, likely actually, but as what alignment is what I think is more interesting.

I'd say that Superhaus's approach was townier than not, but I don't think that it said anything about Connor's alignment. Do you?

[toblerone187]

@Toblerone, if you had to kill someone right now who would it be.

Given the level of content you have posted and now suddenly this question, I would kill you

[LicketyQuickety]

Could be, likely actually, but as what alignment is what I think is more interesting.

I'd say that Superhaus's approach was townier than not, but I don't think that it said anything about Connor's alignment. Do you?

No.

Reread that post. I questioned why Super made such a quick change to voting a lurker. You disagree?

[Nachomamma8]

What makes you think I was BS with the cop thing? I did it to generate content as well as making a true statement (if the is a cop and its not you) as well as a reaction test. Tell me what is "BS" about that?

Well, you made a post that looked sketchy (in particular, by pretending to have knowledge of a cop in the game) in order to generate information. That is bullshitting.

Your suggestion to have the cop investigate me was also something that I thought you were lying about because it's remarkably short-sighted; cop wants to investigate people who will be alive; if I am scum and you don't feel you can catch me on play, you can catch me by my partner's play and you can catch me by forming town blocks; wasting an investigative role on someone who scum probably needs to shoot eventually is silly.

[Nachomamma8]

Could be, likely actually, but as what alignment is what I think is more interesting.

I'd say that Superhaus's approach was townier than not, but I don't think that it said anything about Connor's alignment. Do you?

No.

Reread that post. I questioned why Super made such a quick change to voting a lurker. You disagree?

I do.

[Nachomamma8]

You are a (slight [which you misinterpreted]) Scum read for fishing for info in a way that is not clearly town mindset. You are smart which is why I am saying this.

Asking someone what they are doing when they are doing something confusing is not fishing; it's proper play.

[LicketyQuickety]

What makes you think I was BS with the cop thing? I did it to generate content as well as making a true statement (if the is a cop and its not you) as well as a reaction test. Tell me what is "BS" about that?

Well, you made a post that looked sketchy (in particular, by pretending to have knowledge of a cop in the game) in order to generate information. That is bullshitting.

Your suggestion to have the cop investigate me was also something that I thought you were lying about because it's remarkably short-sighted; cop wants to investigate people who will be alive; if I am scum and you don't feel you can catch me on play, you can catch me by my partner's play and you can catch me by forming town blocks; wasting an investigative role on someone who scum probably needs to shoot eventually is silly.

Glad you caught it, was thinking the same thing... about the tracker I mean. However, this game is just getting started and I have no doubts you know how to play the game to survive.

[Nachomamma8]

That's a fast change mate, mind explaining?

I expect the "combine our efforts" phraseology gave away pretty solidly what the purpose of the vote was, and Superhaus's assertion that he'd unvote when Lovesick gave content showed that he picked up on that purpose. It would be a scummy change of mindset of what he made was a vote with the intention of lynching, but that pretty clearly wasn't the case.

[LicketyQuickety]

You are a (slight [which you misinterpreted]) Scum read for fishing for info in a way that is not clearly town mindset. You are smart which is why I am saying this.

Asking someone what they are doing when they are doing something confusing is not fishing; it's proper play.

Maybe I am a genius or maybe I am looking into motivation that isn't there. Its unlikely I am a genius, however, I could be reading the motivation correctly.

[LicketyQuickety]

That's a fast change mate, mind explaining?

I expect the "combine our efforts" phraseology gave away pretty solidly what the purpose of the vote was, and Superhaus's assertion that he'd unvote when Lovesick gave content showed that he picked up on that purpose. It would be a scummy change of mindset of what he made was a vote with the intention of lynching, but that pretty clearly wasn't the case.

Well, I am Town reading Lovesick for it, so there is that.

[LicketyQuickety]

What makes you think I was BS with the cop thing? I did it to generate content as well as making a true statement (if the is a cop and its not you) as well as a reaction test. Tell me what is "BS" about that?

Well, you made a post that looked sketchy (in particular, by pretending to have knowledge of a cop in the game) in order to generate information. That is bullshitting.

Your suggestion to have the cop investigate me was also something that I thought you were lying about because it's remarkably short-sighted; cop wants to investigate people who will be alive; if I am scum and you don't feel you can catch me on play, you can catch me by my partner's play and you can catch me by forming town blocks; wasting an investigative role on someone who scum probably needs to shoot eventually is silly.

Well, It gave me a Town read that you don't disagree with.

[LicketyQuickety]

You are a (slight [which you misinterpreted]) Scum read for fishing for info in a way that is not clearly town mindset. You are smart which is why I am saying this.

Asking someone what they are doing when they are doing something confusing is not fishing; it's proper play.

Well, I am terrible at proper play.

[FancyPants]

@Toblerone, if you had to kill someone right now who would it be.

Given the level of content you have posted and now suddenly this question, I would kill you

I'll be more active when the weekend ends, why do you feel me asking you that question makes me scummy?